« on: April 04, 2012, 08:26:53 AM »
Has the guy who removed the OLPF posted the absolute most dead obvious first step of a resolution chart shot with modded and unmodded bodies with downloadable direct from camera files and enough information to 100% reproduce the results? If not, he's hiding something, and I think his inducing people to damage their $3500 cameras is seriously outrageous if he is.
I agree with the idea that a resolution chart (comparison) would be useful here. As much as I like resolution charts, it is picture quality in the real world that matters most. A resolution chart would tell us if resolution is really improved, but it wouldn't necessarily answer how much aliasing shows up on certain objects (though it should show some aliasing, if it exists).
I don't think James Miller is really trying to pull one over on people, nor is he necessarily encouraging anyone to damage their own cameras. Anyone who does so based only on his two videos might deserve a $3500 paper weight.
What he has indicated will be forthcoming this week is a side-by-side comparison with an unmodded 5D3 and his modded 5D3.