March 03, 2015, 03:24:05 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - LuCoOc

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 11
Lens Giveaway Contest / Re: *Contest* Landscape - Post Here.
« on: November 15, 2011, 01:37:44 PM »

Lens Giveaway Contest / Re: *Contest* Flora - Post Here.
« on: November 15, 2011, 01:35:14 PM »

Lens Giveaway Contest / Re: *Contest* Flora - Post Here.
« on: November 15, 2011, 01:33:51 PM »

Lens Giveaway Contest / Re: *Contest* Street - Post Here.
« on: November 15, 2011, 01:30:56 PM »

Lens Giveaway Contest / Re: *Contest* Abstract - Post Here.
« on: November 15, 2011, 01:29:36 PM »

Lens Giveaway Contest / Re: *Contest* Landscape - Post Here.
« on: November 15, 2011, 01:25:29 PM »

Lens Giveaway Contest / Re: *Contest* Landscape - Post Here.
« on: November 15, 2011, 01:23:26 PM »

Lens Giveaway Contest / Re: *Contest* Landscape - Post Here.
« on: November 15, 2011, 01:22:04 PM »

United States / Re: Photography is Terrorism?
« on: October 11, 2011, 09:59:26 AM »
I neither want to get too much into politics here nor do i want to judge these incidents. However, here's a link to a post earlier this year about a group of people taking pictures on a plane - in the US.,907.msg11985.html#msg11985

It seem's that both occurences were misunderstandings and are less related to a political wing beeing in power than to more people beeing suspicious when seeing a person acting in a way wich they think is wrong (e.g. terrorists or pedophiles)

Lenses / Re: 300mm f2.8 II vs 200-400mm f4.0 TC1.4 your opinion
« on: September 30, 2011, 02:26:07 PM »
I hope you don't want an IQ opinion :)
Before I want to tell you whats on my mind, you need to remember that the 200-400 is not yet anounced. It's only anounced to be in developement and nobody knows when it will be available. So if you need the lens now, get it now.

My opinion is:
The 200-400 is way more flexible and it`s easier and faster to frame a moving subject with it. The 300mm advantage is the f 2.8 aparture which will make it easier to stop action. The 200-400 will allow you to frame wider than the 300mm but lacks 40mm at the long end. However the missing mm at the long end will not matter as much as the 100mm on the wide side.

United States / Re: Upgrading lenses
« on: September 20, 2011, 11:17:58 AM »
I shot an evening soccer game last spring and used my 100L macro lens because my 70-200 4.0 L just didn't "collect" enough light.

I attached one of the shots. The settings are Iso 800 f2.8 1/160sec.
I highly recommend a longer lens and if you only a one body (may I ask which body you have?) I'd go for a zoom on a crop body the 70-200 f2.8 should be enough. If you have two bodys and enough money laying around :D you could also go for the 135 2.0 and the 200 2.8. However that would bring you close to the Sigma 120-300 (it's 2000€ at Amazon here in Germany). Your (budget's) choice.

EOS Bodies / Re: More New Full Frame Rumors [CR1]
« on: September 19, 2011, 04:26:13 PM »
well, clearly this is evolutionary. let me wager and outrageously accurate and educated prediction.

a fanciful 5dmkIII with the following:
55MP full frame image with 28 stops of dynamic range and a noiseless ISO range from 25 to 102,400. b/w noise compression kicks in at 409,600 ISO (max). indescribable AF with 90 point recognition at all offered exposure options, of equal power and effectiveness during video. 10,000,000 exposure durability on shutter with 60 - 1/32000 second timing variables. specialty flash sync at 1/2000 of a second. 24fps burst mode at RAW. manual video control over full dynamic range and iso. incremental frame rates from 1 to 240 frames a second at 18bit 4k resolution, uncompressed 4:4:4 prores codec with built in HDR mode. rolling shutter. in-camera aperture, zoom and focus control (wireless with controller). dual CF card reader/writer supporting up to two 512GB 120mb/s cards. 3G-SDI output. thunderbolt output. complete removal of aliasing and moire issues. quarter-inch input for audio, with manual audio control and phenomenal compressor/limiter/white-noise reducer options engineered by Waves.

bunch of other neat stuff.

oh, and it comes as an option with a brand new 16-135mm f/1.2 L series lens with an entirely new motion-predictive system of IS.

they have also rumored the street name for this camera to be appropriately titled "the game changer" ...Nike is also on board for co-op marketing.

wrong thread?

post it here -->,1645.0.html

EOS Bodies / Re: More New Full Frame Rumors [CR1]
« on: September 19, 2011, 01:56:30 PM »
While I agree with all of you who say it a 2009 tech killer, it still means it's the best beeing. Keep in mind that the D800 is only rumored as well as any canon cam comming.

Any "Entry level Full Frame" would be a great step forward - economicly (for canon) and maybe even revolutionary. Wasn't the classic 5D the first FF cam below the 1D(s)/Nikon D(X) series and revolutioned the camera lines of both companies. Producing an even cheaper camera could be the next step towards a FF for the mass camera.
I'm neither looking for a new Camera at the moment nor within the next 1 or 2 years but very excited about this rumor. A cheap Full Frame cam is what I would like to upgrade to...



Lenses / Re: Any news on a EF 50mm - F/1.2 ll ?
« on: September 19, 2011, 01:10:25 PM »
I feel as if this lens rumor has been discussed before, then quickly discarded... Is the idea of the EF 50mm F/1.2 being updated by Canon still a possibility?

There haven't been any rumors about it here but a few months ago there was a CR2 on 1.4 II and 1.8 III rumors,989.0.html


ups... just checked the "List of rumored lenses"-thread,15.0.html there is a CR1 rumor for a 50 1.2 II

but as always keep in mind that it's only a rumor if you need the lens/camera/what ever buy it now don't hesitate

Landscape / Re: Palouse Falls, monochrome
« on: September 18, 2011, 10:49:26 AM »
nice shot!
what gear did you use and what were the settings?

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 11