January 29, 2015, 09:29:14 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - tomscott

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 44
196
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: Pet Portraits with 5D Mark III
« on: June 18, 2014, 05:17:01 AM »
The GF has a mini farm, heres a few of her dogs, goat and donkey

All 5DMKIII with 24-105 and all natural light

IMG_0651 by TomScottPhoto, on Flickr

Pensive Pup by TomScottPhoto, on Flickr

IMG_0656 by TomScottPhoto, on Flickr

IMG_0700 by TomScottPhoto, on Flickr

Donkey in the snow, Skirwith, Cumbria by TomScottPhoto, on Flickr

Donkey in the snow, Skirwith, Cumbria by TomScottPhoto, on Flickr

Donkey in the snow, Skirwith, Cumbria by TomScottPhoto, on Flickr

Goat in the snow, Skirwith, Cumbria by TomScottPhoto, on Flickr


197
Animal Kingdom / Re: Animals at Night
« on: June 18, 2014, 04:07:07 AM »
Chester Zoo Twilight Zone, Vampire Bat

40D 70-200mm F2.8 L MKI 200mm (320mm) 1/30 3200ISO

Bat by TomScottPhoto, on Flickr

198
Lenses / Re: EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 : possible issue?
« on: June 17, 2014, 10:19:20 AM »
I have owned the 17-55mm for 4 years. The IS is pretty loud but the AF is perfect snaps on very quickly. Ive used it on a 350, 450, 40, 50 and 7D and had no issues.

The only issues I've had have been dust and the zoom ring is a little rough, probably from too much use over the years.

Where were you focusing? was it somewhere with good contrast not some dark indoor situation with no light?

199
Landscape / Re: Waterscapes
« on: June 17, 2014, 04:20:07 AM »
Dug out one that was one of my first images 2006 Barton Fell, Ullswater Cumbria, UK
Barton Fell, Lake Ullswater, Cumbria by TomScottPhoto, on Flickr


Similar location a few weeks back on a miserable day

Barton Fell, Ullswater, Cumbria by TomScottPhoto, on Flickr

Aira Force, Ullswater, Cumbria

Aira Force Waterfall, Ullswater, Cumbria by TomScottPhoto, on Flickr

Aira Force Waterfall, Ullswater, Cumbria by TomScottPhoto, on Flickr

Aira Force Waterfall, Ullswater, Cumbria by TomScottPhoto, on Flickr

Aira Force Waterfall, Ullswater, Cumbria by TomScottPhoto, on Flickr


200
Looks like an interesting camera!

201
Animal Kingdom / Re: Brown bear cub on the lookout
« on: June 14, 2014, 12:59:26 PM »
Wonderful images

202
Reviews / Re: Is Canon 5d mk 1 still a good camera?
« on: June 13, 2014, 06:18:12 AM »
There is no reason to purchase the 5D3 unless you are shooting Sports/Wildlife or if you wanted to shoot video. The 6D is an excellent stills camera and you will find it a nice step up from the 5D in every way (with the one exception that you might miss the joystick).

Certainly not true.

The 6D is great if your a landscape shooter or place your focus point in the middle of the frame, but if your using fast glass like F1.2-2.8 you might struggle to get focus with focus recompose methods to have any focus point other than in the middle of the frame. I wouldn't say the 5DMKIII is the go to camera for sports or wildlife, it can be used but the buffer and FPS aren't really suited thats where the 1DX comes in.

The 5DMKIII is the perfect wedding/journo/commercial photographers tool.

204
I agree with anyone who says buy the 24-70mm II because it is one of if not the sharpest zoom lens available.

But only from a professional stand point, I wouldn't agree for a travel companion unless you need the extra quality for publication.

I bought the 24-105mm with my 5DMKIII which I think is brilliant and I have a stellar copy, but then bought the 24-70mm MKI because I wanted the F2.8 for weddings. I bought the MKI because I got a very late copy which was immaculate and is also a stellar copy and at the moment I don't think the double price tag for the new version is warranted although it is a brilliant lens £1600 compared to £750 easy decision. I also like the reverse zoom design, I live in Cumbria one of the wettest places in the UK and the reverse design helps keep water off the lens element 90% of the time with the lens hood being so large.

With that out of the way, I find the 24-70 stays at home unless I'm working. F2.8 isn't used very often when I'm traveling around and F4 is still great, equivalent to F2.8 on APC in terms of DOF so I don't think the OP would miss it. Also the 24-70 is lacking in range for travel photography, and it has no IS. IS is a big deal if your used to having IS on any standard lens and most standard APC lenses have it so most people will be used to it, add that to an upgrade path to a full frame camera with much more mirror slap and a heavier camera results may be disappointing. Where you are used to shooting at 1/30th-1/80th with IS you will probably find with the extra weight and mirror slap that you will end up with slightly blurred images. A learning curve with the way you shoot may be steep and annoying at first.

So in this respect I wouldn't recommend the 24-70MKII neither the 70-200mm F2.8 II. For travel purpose I would suggest the 6D with 24-105 L, 70-300mm L and a fast prime like the 35mm F2 IS or 50mm 1.4 for low light conditions.

This kit is more compact and lighter than the suggested and with weight and space a premium this is a much better all rounder than the big pro guns.

In time I would buy the 24-70MKII and 70-200mm MKII for pro shooting, you simply can't beat the combo.

Infact just buy it all  ;) GAS will set in quick

205
Lenses / Re: New 70-200mm MKII DUST!
« on: June 12, 2014, 06:12:32 AM »
Just a quick update the lens was sent back and found to have a manufactures fault so a new one is being sent out!

Relieved :)

206
Lenses / Re: This thing's gotta go!
« on: June 11, 2014, 05:19:15 AM »
I have an old 40D which is a cracking camera, probably my favourite Canon camera of all time bar the 5DIII (5DMKIII is like a full frame 40D with better AF and had been waiting for it for a long time). Its sat in the closet with my trusty 17-55mm F2.8 IS which is also fantastic. I can't bare to get rid and I use it as a back up camera for weddings etc the 40D at 100-400ISO with a 70-200mm F2.8 MKII is very useful and still creates great images.

Keeping my APC gear simply because I am waiting for a new APC to shoot wildlife, I originally replaced the 40d with a 7D and was never satisfied with that 18mp sensor miles more noise at base ISO where I shot most but didn't mind the higher noise as the 40D was so poor at 800 and above. Having 3200 look like 800 was pretty impressive but wasnt enough for me to keep it.

But saying that if the 7DMKII isn't what I want I will buy another 5DMKIII.

Also got my eye on the tammy 150-600mm to get out and shoot some wildlife.

Also have my trusty 24-105mm love it and use it casually but recently bought the 24-70mm F2.8 MKI and thats been strapped to the 5DMKIII since. So ye I have 3 standard focal length lenses….

207
Lenses / Re: 70-200 f/2.8 IS II - Difference between 2012 and 2014?
« on: June 10, 2014, 11:53:05 AM »
Sent it back now  :-\

208
Lenses / Re: 70-200 f/2.8 IS II - Difference between 2012 and 2014?
« on: June 10, 2014, 05:48:04 AM »
Ye when I received mine last week it came in the silver box, Unfortunately its been sent back because its faulty hopefully will receive a new one soon.


209
Lenses / Re: 70-200 f/2.8L IS II underwhelming
« on: June 06, 2014, 09:12:20 AM »
The pics look ok, at F2.8 and F4 it looks like it may be very very slightly out, but I can't tell if it is front or back focus because the subject you have chosen is flat. If you choose a subject that is slightly more 3 dimensional it will be more obvious. The box looks like it is not parallel with the lens the left side is closer to the camera and appears sharper which make me think its front focusing very slightly. It may need a little AFMA. But nothing to worry about really.

At F8 the results are absolutely perfect, but thats because the whole flat plane should be at that aperture.

Buy focal its fairly cheap and will help sort everything out for you.

Another test you could do is use the AF to focus then take a shot, then turn live view on and manual focus and check the difference, but easier with something with more depth.

210
Lenses / Re: 70-200 f/2.8L IS II underwhelming
« on: June 06, 2014, 07:56:52 AM »
Your certainly not wrong!

Wish I could have had access to the gear at 18 tho! At 26 now think my first L the 70-200mm I bought when I was 20 for my 40D as I started doing a few commercial projects at Uni.

I applaud you and your images show great talent and a great career ahead of you.

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 44