December 21, 2014, 07:22:37 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 13
Photography Technique / Re: Shoot from the rearend of the subjects.
« on: February 13, 2014, 08:25:51 PM »
booty call  ;D   Taken during camping trip to Pinecrest CA. 

Lenses / Re: The 100-400 or the 70-200 f2.8 II+2x Mark III for wildlife
« on: December 26, 2013, 02:24:09 PM »
Not sure about widlife shooting but in my experience with the 1D4 shooting fast action outdoor sports, the 70-200 2.8L II + 2X TC outperformed the 100-400 in IQ and speed.  Additionally, zooming in/out with the 70-200 + 2X TC was much easier than a push/pull zoom that added unwanted movement to the camera even with a Gimbal head.

I'm about ready to sell my 100-400 since it seldom gets used.

Hope this helps.

A post Merry Christmas to all the CR mod's and forum participants. Wishing you all the very best of the new year!

Site Information / Re: What in the heck is happening to the CR web site
« on: December 20, 2013, 08:00:47 PM »
Same here with my office desktop using Windows XP and IE for the browser.

However, my home desktop doesn't have that problem running Windows 7 and Chrome for the browser.

If its not too late I would definitely consider the Fuji XE2, not the XE1.  The XE2 has many improvements in AF speed, wifi, etc that the previous model was not at its best at. 

As a Canon 5D3, 1D4 and 6D shooter, I too needed a more compact system to cart around daily.  I rented an XE1 with the 35mm f1.4 lens and was sold.  They are extremely light weight and perform GREAT in low light with high ISO!  I  am so excited about this format as a daily camera I find my big gear is only coming out when I truly need it. The Fuji allows me to be more spontaneous and carry it with me every day.

It has many features you'll find on the DSLR's if you need them.  One feature I really like is being able to shoot SQUARE format, like a medium format camera.  Now, how great is that?

Anyway, wish you best with this decision.

Lenses / Re: Canon EF 35 f/1.4L II to Finally Arrive? [CR1]
« on: December 10, 2013, 09:53:39 AM »
Yes, this would be great to see if Canon can compete with Sigma's 35mm f1.4, especially with a competitive price. I have the Sigma and it is extremely sharp in all respects but I'm not a big fan of the bokeh from this lens when compared to other Canon lenses.

Lets see what Canon can do.

EOS Bodies / Cam Ranger and focus peaking
« on: November 22, 2013, 10:31:08 AM »
Hi Guys,

I thought I'd share this information with all the MF lens shooters out there; the CamRanger accessory provides focus peaking which I find to be a great asset for manual focusing.  Especially nice when you're focus stacking. The focus peaking highlights are in red and not white like other camera manufacturers use.  I personally find the red to be easier to see and obviously focus on the LCD.

CamRanger also has a feature for focus stacking and setting up the number of shots you want but I have yet to determine if it does a better job than what I can do manually, other than it does it automatically after set up.

My Fuji X cameras have focus peaking and this feature is so nice to use with MF lenses.  After you start using this feature its so hard to consider not having it on every camera  you use.

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Focus Peaking for Canon 5D3
« on: October 18, 2013, 03:56:43 PM »
Hi Guys,

Sorry if this has been discussed before but after using a focus peaking feature on my Fuji camera's I really would enjoy this feature with my 5D3 and Zeiss lenses.  It really makes manuallly focusing so much easier IMO. 

I would imagine that Magic Lantern has offered this but wondered if anyone is using ML on a regular basis with a 5D3 for stills and what do you/they think of it.

Thanks again,
Danville, CA USA

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: x-pro1
« on: October 07, 2013, 08:36:56 PM »

I'm a Canon user and have been for many, many years.

 I also own and shoot daily with a Fuji XE1 and XM1 along with Fuji AF lenses and legacy lenses from Minolta, Zeiss, Canon, Nikon and Voigtlander.   The Fuji line is a great camera for portraits, travel and PAD's.  The IQ is just amazing. 

My initial intent was to lighten my load, carry less lenses while minimizing my $ output and have more fun. Well, 3 out of 4 ain't bad.  This gear is much more affordable than, say, .... a $4,000 lens from Zeiss.  It has it's limitations but it also has some really great features.

If you don't have one yet, rent one.

Lenses / Re: prime focal length choices
« on: August 27, 2013, 03:39:20 PM »
Like most have said:  135L f2.0, 85 1.2L II, and maybe a Siggy 35 1.4 ....and a Zeiss 50mm f2.0.  Oh, and a great bargain for the price; 200 f2.8L II, this being a fast and lightweight lens (non-white) that is about the same size as the 135L. 

Best Regards,

Software & Accessories / Re: Portability: laptops vs desktops
« on: July 29, 2013, 08:10:00 PM »
I've got a MacBook Pro 13" but it is not optimized for large files and I'm not completely comfortable with mac platforms, my own learning curve is at fault.   

What does "not optimized for large files" mean?
Do you mean the screen size?

You should be able run Windows on it.

Sorry, I meant screen size is too small for my comfort, not enough RAM (which is cheap) and has limits on MBP and the processing is much slower on MBP which is why I'm considering jumping platforms back to a laptop PC.

Software & Accessories / Portability: laptops vs desktops
« on: July 29, 2013, 07:05:30 PM »
Need some advice on editing images on the fly.

My current workflow includes downloading images to my Dell desktop and edit those with PS CS6 among other programs.  I either print at home on my Epson 3800 or send out for larger prints, canvas prints, etc or quicko-cheapo small prints from Costco.

My question is this: I'd like to make this workflow portable and stay within the windows platform if possible.  I've got a MacBook Pro 13" but it is not optimized for large files and I'm not completely comfortable with mac platforms, my own learning curve is at fault.   

Oh,  ::) the question: What type of laptop would you recommend to run CS6 that is windows based?  Or other laptop that is designed for this type of work?

I'm quite sure this has been discussed before numerous times and if you can lead this horse to water, I'll drink.

Thank you in advance.

Lenses / Re: What's the Difference: 1.4X EF Extender 2 Vs. 3
« on: July 24, 2013, 12:01:54 PM »
Difference?  about $200  ;D ;D ;D

Software & Accessories / Re: Who Adopted Adobe CC?
« on: July 22, 2013, 07:00:06 PM »
If you put in the hands of less people for more $ then it balances out their equation.  For me personally, the current CS6 is fine for me and my workflow. I use other programs that do similar adjustments that I can work with to suit my needs. 

Like others, I think we're waiting for Adobe to 'come to their senses'.  With this poll, its obvious they may be losing alot more than they're gaining.

You should share the results of this poll with Adobe.

Lenses / Re: 17-40 Replacement
« on: July 12, 2013, 05:51:12 PM »
I feel your pain as I've had and sold the 17-40, twice.  Had the 16-35 f2.8L mark 1 and sold that and now have the equally as horrible mark II version.  It works 'ok' at F4 - F11 but still soft in the corners. I only use it when I need the 16mm range, with caution.

The landscape lenses I use now are the 24TSE-II and a Zeiss 35mm 2.0 or the Sigma 35mm 1.4. All three are incredibly sharp throughout 'most' of the range. I hope in time to sell one of the 35mm's as I don't need to carry more than I can use. 

As you know, both the TSE and Zeiss are manual focus.  Getting critical sharpness is lesson to learn.  I'm lucky enough to also use a Zeiss 100mm, which for landscape, is a great tool also.

You also mentioned the Canon 24mm II  which I've heard is also a great lens but the TSE appears to out perform it in the IQ arena.

Lastly, the Zeiss 21mm would be my next purchase after I sell some of my other mothball fleet lenses.

Best of Luck

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5D3 wireless photo transfer options...
« on: July 08, 2013, 04:05:30 PM »
I've got a 5D3 also and shoot with wi-fi cards on occasion so a client or 'other' can view the images on an IOS device within  seconds after they are shot.  It works well but has limitations.  I shoot small JPG's to the wifi SD card that load up to an Ipad for the client and shoot RAW to the CF card for post processing later.

Another great option is the CamRanger that was mentioned above. I picked up one a few weeks ago and it works great for remote shooting from an IOS device. The best feature is the Live View shooting where you can make all adjustments on the screen before taking the shot.  You can shoot HDR and focus-stacking with the free app.

Best of luck!

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 13