February 27, 2015, 08:05:18 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Hector1970

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8
Photography Technique / Iceland Hints and Tips
« on: August 05, 2014, 04:43:57 AM »
Hi All
I was thinking in 2015 of going to Iceland. I was looking for others advice and experience on Iceland.
I had a number of questions where I hope you might help.
A) recommended photographic tour companies
B) recommended time of year to travel
C) recommended places must have to visit
D) recommended gear to bring (any point in bringing a heavy 70-200mm
E) recommended clothing (just how cold can it be)
F) I don't eat fish - will I starve? :-)
G) any good suggestions / tips

Canon General / Re: What is your Least Used Piece of Gear?
« on: July 31, 2014, 03:51:22 PM »
A Wimberly Plamp.
Lens baby Muse
An array of flash accessories too embarrassing to use.
Oh it hurts the money I've wasted!

I'm on my second version the Hero 3+ Black.
Video quality is excellent (wide angle - you won't be zooming in)
You can do great slow motion work.
It's hard to avoid not to buy accessories. A tripod mount is a necessity.
It does great time lapse . Photos are so so, like a camera phone. It can do 10fps.
Menu system is a pain. I still get it wrong.
You can now pair you phone to the 3+ which makes it easier but drains the battery.
Battery life is the downside. Goes suddenly. The battery indicators not great. Switching batteries means opening the case. The battery cover isn't hinged.
I think it's brilliant for what it's for ie: Action video
Handling and Ergnomics could be much better.
Getting rid of the dive housing and making a waterproof camera in itself would help a lot.
Still the videos you get make great memories.

So many places  :D
1 Iceland
2 serenghetti (I've been there pre digital -amazing )
3 Southern Argentina
4 Everest base camp
5 Yosemite

EOS Bodies / Re: A Few EOS 7D Mark II Specs [CR1]
« on: June 12, 2014, 06:24:20 AM »
Given the potential customer base of those moving from other APS-C models I reckon
It will have a mode dial,
It will have a flash,
It will be size of a 5D or slightly less,
You will have to buy your own battery grip,
I'd say ~10 frames a second.
24 Megapixel.
Reasonably modern focusing (from the 5D M III)
An improved ISO performance - closer to the 5D
Good video but nothing spectacular
Reasonably good screen
Wifi and Gps
Dual cards .
In essence a good camera that makes you feel like a pro but mainly sold to experienced amateurs.
It will be better than most of their friends cameras but still a step below a 1-DX and not full frame so it doesn't impact too much 5D sales
I'd say they have their market down to a T.
It will cost just less than a 5d Mark III .

We'll see I guess

Lenses / Re: 70-200 f/2.8L IS II underwhelming
« on: June 06, 2014, 07:36:02 AM »
You  must have received a very bad copy.
It's a tremendous lens. Super sharp and accurate.
At 18 comparing things to Hasselblads is interesting.
You seem to know something about photography and unless you are over complicating how you are taking photos I couldn't see how the problem is you.
A complete beginner would take great shots with a normal version of this lens.
Maybe you should buy a 5D Mark III to pair with it.
At 18 you'd probably be better off buying cheap equipment and making the most out of them.
You'd potentially learn more that way.
Jumping straight to a 70-200mm F2.8 II means maybe you won't every appreciate how good it is (if you had a good copy).
There is too much emphasis on buying gear (I include myself here ) and not enough on improving the actual photos we take. Lack of equipment makes you're innovative and better out technique.
I hope you get your version replaced with a proper version. Hopefully you'll then see what a great lens it is.

EOS Bodies / Re: Can Canon deliver a FF sensor that is class leading?
« on: June 05, 2014, 09:51:14 AM »
I know some people here get sick of this dynamic range discussion but I find it interesting.
I always amazed at some of Transnistriathe knowledge displayed here.
My question is more simple.
With brightish scenes I often use graduated filters or maybe do a bit of blending or HDR to avoid blown himghlights.
How far off are we in getting a sensor from Canon that might render it obsolete to use graduated filters to control over brightness in the sky?
I know the eye is complex and because it's sort of combining images and may have an equivalent dynamic range of 24 stops. Ideally I want a camera that is capturing the view closer to what my braining is receiving.
A sensor that is a capable of holding detail in a sunny day is what I would love.

I'd love a sensor too that you zoom in further that say the 5D Mark III without the picture pixelating.
I love those giga pixel pictures where you can zoom and zoom.

It might be easier to list what I wouldn't buy:
But did.
Sigma 150-500
Canon 28mm 2.8
Sigma 10-20mm
Canon 70-300mm III
Lens baby
Zeiss? Pentacon six 50mm with tilt adapter
Canon 50mm 1.8
Samyang 8mm Fisheye(although it is good on an APS-C
Canon 85mm 1.2 L
Canon G12
I won't even mention the gadgets and triggers and flash modifiers I've wasted money on.
No wonder Garry Fong is so rich

I would rebuy
Canon 70-200mm f2.8 II
Canon 24mm TSe II
Canon 50mm 1.4
Samyang 14mm
Canon 24-105 F4l
Canon 100mm marcro
Canon 1.4 and 2x extensions
5D Mark III
580ex II flash

I'd replace 17-40 with a 16-35mm

I'd also rebuy the Fuji X100s.
It's a lovely camera to use (even though I don't think it's image quality is good as a Canon APS-C sensor
I'd rebuy a Gopro too for time lapsing
Lee filters I'd certainly rebuy.

No wonder people simplify later in life.
Too much gear not enough time taking photos

Lenses / Re: Sigma 300-800 - Anyone use this lens?
« on: April 20, 2014, 08:01:45 PM »
It has great reviews on Amazon
But not as good reviews as the Sigma 200-500 F2.8

Lenses / Re: Thinking about this but wanting your thoughts....
« on: March 18, 2014, 03:14:32 PM »
Best of luck in your search for the right lens. The only thing I would say is I think the 70-200 II F2.8 is the best of all Canons zoom lens. It creates beautiful photograph. It locks on focus very fast. It's very adaptable to sport , portraits and even landscapes. Other than the cost you'd never regret buying it. I use the canon 1.4 and the Kenko 2x converters. Still good but maybe some of the magic disappears. Probably for what you are planning the existing 100-400 is good enough.

Landscape / Re: Slot Canyons- Canyon X and Upper Antelope, Grand Canyon
« on: December 02, 2013, 04:59:52 AM »
Thanks for sharing you experience . You were kind to do so and you made good use of the feedback here. Some lovely shots. A9586 being my favourite. Looks like tough conditions to photograph in. Others have complained about the crowding too. I suppose everyone has to make a buck. Glad you felt it was worth it. The crowds will be bigger next year because of your great photos.

Lenses / Re: 70-200mm F 2.8 IS 2 VS 70-200mm F4 IS
« on: November 21, 2013, 06:07:09 PM »
I own the 2.8 II but have used the F4.
Both are great. Of all my lens I think the 2.8 is the best .
It's absolutely brilliant for sports and for portraits.
The F4 is way lighter and cheaper and very very good. You will love it but maybe crave the 2.8
The 2.8 will either give you big muscles or a repetitive strain injury.
But it's wonderful and even after 2 years it hasn't lost its appeal .
I have the 85mm II and I wouldn't rate it anywhere near as good.
It's too tricky at times whereas the 70-200mm always comes up trumps.

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon EOS 5D Mk III handling annoyances
« on: November 20, 2013, 06:28:32 PM »
For me I think the Focus confirmation is poor on the 5D. The focus point should light when focus is made. Sometimes it does this in the dark but appears erratic. The focus confirmation on the view finder this green dot is not distinct enough.

Lenses / Re: Which TS lens is better
« on: October 23, 2013, 06:00:53 AM »
I had this dilemma 17 vs 24mm. I chose 24mm and haven't regretted it. I think it's a more flexible focal length.
I could see that if it were interiors that you want to use it for the 17mm might be more appropriate.
I mainly use it for landscape and 24mm is perfect for that. Stitching also works really well if you want a wider view. Filters were an important factor for me. The 17mm at the time wasn't so straightforward.
So thumbs up on the 24mm TSE II. I don't leave home without it  ( I am just praying that I don't ever break the knobs.)

I was interested in someones statement earlier about using it wide open
(I guess maybe astro photographers would a lot, though).
I am using a 14mm Samyang for Wide field Astrophotography.
I was wondering if the 24mm was commonly used for this.
I never thought of using it as maybe I thought it might be fiddly in the dark.

Hahnel are a very good and reputable company. Their batteries are good. Ive found them amongst the best. Opteka are good too. Their wireless trigger equipment is excellent.
I'm very confident in buying their gear. It's never let me down. Their HQ is in Ireland but they are a German family firm I believe. It's a good combination. German engineering with Irish ingenuity.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8