September 02, 2014, 05:30:18 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - tomsop

Pages: 1 [2] 3
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Announces the EOS T5i
« on: March 21, 2013, 10:00:50 AM »
I skipped the  t4i because of bad video autofocus ability.   It focuses slightly faster than a drunk man looking for the house key on his key ring according to,the reviews.

Canon is silent about this issue and pretends it does not exist. 

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS Rebel T5i Leaks
« on: March 19, 2013, 04:36:13 PM »
The reason the T4i is not that good is beacuase of the video AF fail.  Can anyone tell from the leaked specs whether the video AF will be fixed?  If just this one very important feature is fixed, that is enough to justify a new model.  Otherwise, I sat on the fence with the t4I, will stay on the fence with the t5I, too. 

Still using a Rebel xsi.

EOS Bodies / Re: The Next Rebel? [CR1]
« on: March 13, 2013, 12:03:29 PM »
For me, the next level needs to respond to the criticism of the prior model and that was mainly the problem with the video autofocus. If they fix that and keep the other parts the same spec then it is still a winner and will definitely make me pull the trigger on a purchase.  I found this website and joined this forum around the time I started looking for a new camera to replace my rebel t4i. I decided not to get the rebel T4i because of the autofocus problem. I may get this camera or the next mirror less Version if they improve the video autofocus. Once they do that They will find plenty of new buyers of their cameras because many people want to do both video and photos With the same device just like we do with our iPhone but at a better quality level.  I Like my old camera because the photos are better than the iPhone and I want my videos to be better than the iPhone as well. When I can get both of those features  in the same camera I will buy.

EOS-M / Re: EOS M Autofocus Performance Won't Improve via Firmware [CR2]
« on: February 18, 2013, 09:27:27 PM »
I really doubt Canon won't take the advantage of a firmware update to try to market it as an AF improvement and then leave it as an unquantifiable statement about improved AF.

It is funny how many people knew this would be a stinker before it saw the inside of a showroom.  1st gen is not an excuse  - I would have fired the people who let a subpar product see light of day.  We are too kind to these people and show way too much loyalty.

I have been on the sidelines with my Rebel Xsi because I am a casual photographer and don't need this equipment to earn my living.  I will continue to wait one more cycle to see if Canon can fix AF issues with the Rebel, M series or the 6D and not keep making silly mistakes (one point AF on 6D)  - if the next product does not deliver then I guess Sony or Nikon will be getting my money.   

EOS Bodies / Will the 6D have video AF
« on: November 27, 2012, 01:34:59 PM »
I was wondering if the new EOS 6D that is coming out next month will have video AF much like the Rebel T4i?

The poor handing of video AF is what is stopping me from getting the T4i so I wonder if the 6D will have it - if so I will want to see how that feature works as compared to the Rebel's implentation of it.   Thanks, Tom.

Pricewatch Deals / Re: Canon EOS-M in Stock at Norman Camera
« on: October 30, 2012, 12:59:53 AM »
Does anyone have advice for me.  I have a rebel t4i budget but I found this site while determining whether to wait for the t4i and then was swayed by the critics of the autofocus not to pull the trigger.  I am trying to upgrade from a rebel xsi so this will be my first camera for video too.  I want a camera that does both well.  I don't know if I can wait for the t5 as I suspect I'd have to wait a year.  If I don't use the af feature is it hard to do manual focusing?  I am tempted to get the eos-m just to bide my time until something better shows up.  What should I do?

because people do not want to piss off Canon and still give an honest assessment.

This camera has been out for a month and if you search the youtube postings of various video you will see plenty of footage has been shot with many sorry attempts at tracking moving objects and babies with the autofocus.  The Autofocus feature focuses only slightly better than a drunk with blood alcholol of 1.0 and it leads one to wonder if the only news is bad news then the silence has to be interpreted as not wanting to give bad news for fear of Canon blacklisting.  What else could it be? 

Pricewatch Deals / Re: Canon EOS 7D Factory Refurbs at B&H $1199
« on: July 26, 2012, 12:09:47 AM »
I might be tempted if it came with a man purse so I could have somewhere to store it while going out to dinner with my french girlfriend after a hard day of taking photos of food. 

EOS Bodies / Re: Another Spec List for the Entry Level Full Frame EOS
« on: July 25, 2012, 02:58:41 PM »
I am confused - some are speculating the cost will be $2500.  Mark III is now selling for $150 less than MSRP.  If you are already shelling out $2500 bucks, wouldn't the marginal dollar difference work towards just getting the Mark III now and not having to wait half a year for a stripped down full frame?

I have an old Rebal Xsi and happened on this site when I wanted to learn more about my upgrade options.  I have waited for several months and I prefer to stay under $1K.  I am not happy with the t4i but still waiting to see how the mirrorless camera shoots video. 

On the other hand, I am thinking of getting a man purse and just going with the EOS-M.   

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon EOS M System Announced
« on: July 23, 2012, 01:50:57 AM »
If this is the same as a Rebel T4i minus the viewfinder and other parts, I do not understand the benefits of mirror less.  I would be interested in seeing side by side comparison shots to see what provides better quality.  I was in the market for a rebel but hesitant given the lack of improvement of video quality with the t4i.   I am now more interested in this EOS M camera than the rebel.  I also like the compact and don't care about the loss of a viewfinder - we are all trained by now not to use one thanks to the iPhone. 

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS M Specs
« on: July 22, 2012, 12:19:32 PM »
I skipped n the t4i because of the poor implementation of autofocus in video.  Any chances this mirror less system may work better for video?

When should we expect sample images and video?

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: B&H Begins Shipping the Canon EOS-1D X
« on: July 19, 2012, 09:42:33 AM »
If your pre-order is filling and you no longer want the camera but would consider donating it to another, please let me know.  I will gladly take it off your hands.   ;)

Pricewatch Deals / Re: 5D Mark II Body Price Drop at B&H
« on: July 09, 2012, 08:20:56 PM »
The $100 price drop is not worth it. Assuming the new entry level full frame to replace the 5D Mark II is priced the same, why not buy new technology over this camera that is starting to age.  I am making certain assumptions but I think it may pay to have a little more patience over the impending release of this rumored full frame. 

EOS Bodies / What will a mirror less camera offer
« on: June 24, 2012, 01:32:57 AM »
I know nothing about mirror less other than the name implies.

I was wondering what they will offer in terms of picture quality or video quality.

Will they be better than the Rebel T4i or fall in between a point and shoot and a Rebel.  Or do we need the specs first?  I was just wondering what people expect that they may deliver and will a mirror less offer some advantages over the current technology? 

Thank you for the post. A question I had was whether or not you could compensate for the slow focusing by just doing manual focusing which would probably defeat the purpose of the autofocus motor but would you recommend just using manual focus to get better results.

If you do a search on YouTube there is another video of somebody driving around with a car and it appears that the camera is mounted to the front dashboard of a car in an Asian country with this lens and the focusing is pretty slow as well.

Would it be your opinion that we will probably need a new iteration of this camera before we see a better focusing of this lens?

Pages: 1 [2] 3