July 31, 2014, 04:51:40 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - RLPhoto

Pages: 1 ... 89 90 [91] 92 93 ... 220
1351
EOS Bodies / Re: Will the 70d have a new sensor?
« on: February 28, 2013, 10:19:30 PM »
I doubt it, but I'd love to be wrong on this one.

1352
Lenses / Re: Best lens for baby portraits?
« on: February 28, 2013, 10:17:19 PM »
A 50mm for full body portraits and an 85/135mm for tight shots.

1353
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D MK III Images
« on: February 28, 2013, 09:46:39 PM »
I updated my 2 Year old Self portrait to this newer version 2.0.

I like it. 200 f/2?

Yes, The Ultimate Portrait lens that I could never afford. Its a CPS Loaner and figured might as well make a cool studio shot with its massive front element.

The actual photo was taken on old Faithful 135L @ F/13.

1354
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D MK III Images
« on: February 28, 2013, 09:36:10 PM »
I updated my 2 Year old Self portrait to this newer version 2.0.

1355
EOS Bodies / Re: New DSLR at the End of March [CR2]
« on: February 28, 2013, 10:57:44 AM »
Always in response to nikon eh canon? I remember when it was the other way around.

1356
EOS Bodies / Re: Upgrade from D300s
« on: February 27, 2013, 04:26:28 PM »
D700?

1357
EOS Bodies / Re: Will Canon ever move into the Medium Format space?
« on: February 27, 2013, 04:25:03 PM »
Yes, with competing High MP FF bodies, in the near future.

1358
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 12-24 f/2.8L [CR1]
« on: February 27, 2013, 04:22:29 PM »
If its wider and shaper than the nikon, expect these two things.

1. A ridiculous price tag.

2. A stupendous waiting list.

1359
EOS-M / Re: Future EOS-M Lenses
« on: February 26, 2013, 04:15:03 PM »
If you count the Crop factor, sure why not? afterall, 300mm FOV isn't that tele.

Ah...so crop factor applied to focal length, not just FoV?  You must be in some weird, Star Trek-ian mirrored universe where the normal laws of optical physics don't apply.  Say "Hi" to evil Mr. Spock while you're there...

Just imagine a world where 35mm didn't exist and only M4/3 did. Then we'd all be saying how 150mm is very tele and unless I'm mistaken, 150mm on m4/3 is pretty tele.

Context is important, but since everyone shoots 35mm, I just put it in those terms. Eh Neuro?

1360
EOS-M / Re: Future EOS-M Lenses
« on: February 26, 2013, 03:00:55 PM »
Unfortunatly, no long glass is available yet for micro 4/3 :(


300mm F/2?

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&sku=333503&Q=&is=REG&A=details


That's a 300mm lens?  Do you work for Panasonic's marketing department?   ::)


If you count the Crop factor, sure why not? afterall, 300mm FOV isn't that tele.  ;D

1361
EOS-M / Re: Future EOS-M Lenses
« on: February 26, 2013, 02:50:49 PM »

1362
EOS-M / Re: EOS M Autofocus Performance Won't Improve via Firmware [CR2]
« on: February 26, 2013, 02:44:43 PM »
It a un-wise move to adopt a First gen product when its the only option available.

...unless you need the feature(s) that are only available in that first gen product.  Granted, I haven't run across that scenario for photography...but it happens often in my day job.

So, EOS-M Gen2 won't be better and make the Gen1 cheaper? And avoiding problems by not adopting a gen1 system until gen2 is released?

Sure, a second generation version will improve upon the original, and make the original cheaper.  But if you require a feature or features of the first version, you put up with the problems (not like the 2nd gen won't have it's own set of them) and you pay the premium.

Exactly, my original post.

"No surprise here. 1st Gen product."

1363
Lenses / Re: Will Canon step up to Zeiss with a 55mm 1.4L?
« on: February 26, 2013, 02:42:11 PM »
No need, 50L is king.  8)

1364
EOS-M / Re: The Next EOS M? [CR1]
« on: February 26, 2013, 02:38:57 PM »
A Metabones Like tele-compressor from canon would even out the playing field on APS vs FF EVILS. Lets just see If they're smart enough to do so.

Then you are not working with a true optical image

So, where's the issue?

1365
EOS-M / Re: EOS M Autofocus Performance Won't Improve via Firmware [CR2]
« on: February 26, 2013, 02:35:42 PM »
It a un-wise move to adopt a First gen product when its the only option available.

...unless you need the feature(s) that are only available in that first gen product.  Granted, I haven't run across that scenario for photography...but it happens often in my day job.

So, EOS-M Gen2 won't be better and make the Gen1 cheaper? And avoiding problems by not adopting a gen1 system until gen2 is released?

Pages: 1 ... 89 90 [91] 92 93 ... 220