October 01, 2014, 02:36:11 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - RLPhoto

Pages: 1 ... 98 99 [100] 101 102 ... 232
1486
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: The Next Zeiss Lenses? [CR2]
« on: March 04, 2013, 04:42:07 PM »
If Zeiss would just put AF, I'd never own any canon lenses.

I wonder why they don't make AF lenses for Canon or Nikon bodies?

Because $0ny doesn't want to.  >:(

1487
Lenses / Re: Photozone spanks the 24-70 F4 USM L IS
« on: March 04, 2013, 03:21:53 PM »
This lens was DOA @ 1499$. IQ wouldn't of mattered at that price.
+1
Cannot really see the point with this lens, one could get tammy 24-70 + 100 mm non-L macro lens for that amount and these two are f/2.8 lenses after all...

Cheers!

Or even

28mm 1.8
50mm 1.4/1.8
100mm F/2

or

24-105L (Used) + 100L (used)

or

5Dc + 24-105 + 50mm 1.8

or

1500$ worth of frito lays.

1488
A little late to the 1998 USM party nikon?

1489
It should be Ok-Good. Decently sharp @ F/5.6, Really sharp @ F/8

1490
EOS Bodies / Re: What about a more versatile sensor dimensions?
« on: March 04, 2013, 02:21:39 PM »
If it was square, It would save my need's for battery grips.

1491
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: The Next Zeiss Lenses? [CR2]
« on: March 04, 2013, 02:19:17 PM »
If Zeiss would just put AF, I'd never own any canon lenses.

1492
Lenses / Re: UV filters (any difference?)
« on: March 04, 2013, 02:16:14 PM »
Proven to make your images softer but protect your lens from a tree. your call.

Noticeably softer?  I would like to see the source of that fact (unless you are referring to cheap filters).

+1

I was thinking the same thing, at the same time.

1493
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Deals: Canon EOS 5D Mark III & Canon EOS 6D
« on: March 04, 2013, 02:15:13 PM »
Or you can get a canon refurbish 5d iii for $2379.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/News/News-Post.aspx?News=4318

Whoa, And I thought I had a good deal for 2499$.

1494
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Deals: Canon EOS 5D Mark III & Canon EOS 6D
« on: March 04, 2013, 01:35:42 PM »
If you wait till Holidays, 5D3's could be as low as 2499$.  8)

1495
Lenses / Re: Photozone spanks the 24-70 F4 USM L IS
« on: March 04, 2013, 01:32:57 PM »
This lens was DOA @ 1499$. IQ wouldn't of mattered at that price.

1496
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Nikon finally Admits D600 Dust Problem
« on: March 04, 2013, 01:17:38 PM »
Being a Canon user, I was completely unaware of such faults. No need to panic, continue to shoot canon.


:|

1497
Lighting / Re: Which flash for a 5d mkIII
« on: March 04, 2013, 01:14:17 PM »
If you've got the $$$, Get the 600-RT

If less, Get the 580EXII.

If even less, Get the 430EXII

If even less, Third-party options are available.

If no Budget, Grab a flashlight. :P

1498
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 ZE Planar
« on: March 04, 2013, 12:57:54 PM »
I had an EG-S screen in my 5Dc. I loved it so much, I never changed it back. It will allow you to see the DOF very well but your lenses slower than F/2.8 will be darker thru the VF. It didn't bother me enough to switch it back.

To change the screen, Its pretty simple. Just be in a cleaner area to prevent dust in the VF when changing the screens.

1499
Lenses / Re: UV filters (any difference?)
« on: March 04, 2013, 11:42:56 AM »
I always use filters
According to MrFotoFool, you and I (and anyone else who uses filters) are just "snapshooters" and are not "serious photographers" :D

Or maybe we're just clumsy...

Just the other day I was out taking some snapshots with my 1D X and EF 600mm f/4L IS II and I didn't have a UV filter on the front of the lens.   :P   

In fact, here's the snapshot to prove it!

If they made them for Big Tele's, I'd probably buy one to be honest.  :-X

1500
Yuck! I never liked Kodachrome. Fuji-chrome was far better or even etkachrome.

Pages: 1 ... 98 99 [100] 101 102 ... 232