The 24L II is more awesome than the 35L IMO. Its really Wide and Really Fast!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
their target is to record in 4K not timelapse it.
they offer cinema 4K as well at only 12 fps.
its a microsd card limit.
With the same money of the 24-70 F4L, I could buy a Used 24-105L and 100mm Macro L.
That says enough about my thoughts on that lens.
Then you'd have to also buy a 50mm 1.4, 24mm 1.4 35mm 1.4. and 85mm 1.8, if the quality is good enough.
Show me some of your ISO 3200 Shots from both cameras. I've owned both before and the 5Dc has better ISO performance.
No. You show hard evidence that the reproducible tests available at sites like DPReview and IR are wrong. I'm not the one waving my hand at and dismissing hard data. You are. Back it up or shut up.
And it better be perfect...and reproducible...right down to the last parameter. Not different subjects, lighting, and exposure, shot on the fly at different times and places, then compared, probably at the wrong magnification (i.e. 100% for both meaning the 7D file is inspected more closely), which is typical of people making claims that go against reality.
And don't reply with 36 point type like some child.
The Zeiss is the sharpest 50mm made but its only F/2 and the bokeh isn't as nice as the 50L.
The Zeiss looks great in The Digital Picture comparison. However, the "sharpest 50mm made" appears to be the current Leica 50mm f/1.4. That lens seems to outperform the best from Canon, Nikon, Sigma and Zeiss — though it costs a bundle and won't work on any DSLR. See the charts in the "Overall Comparison" section of the LensRentals "50mm Shootout" here:
And Leica may have surpassed even their own sharpest 50 with their new 50/2 ($7,200), not tested in the LensRentals shootout.