October 24, 2014, 02:52:28 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - RLPhoto

Pages: 1 ... 114 115 [116] 117 118 ... 234
1726
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Help to make my decision.
« on: January 29, 2013, 02:47:06 PM »
You have no FF lenses, which mean's you might as well just sell everything and start new with FF.

1. Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC.
2. Canon 100mm F/2
3. 5D2 or 5D3.

Skip 6D, Not good value for $$$.

1727
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 6D or 5D Mark III
« on: January 29, 2013, 02:23:34 PM »
On a side note, I wouldn't pay full price for a MK3. Mine were for 2499$ and the other for 2999$.  8)

1728
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 6D or 5D Mark III
« on: January 29, 2013, 01:46:47 PM »
If I understand this correctly, RLPhoto could have been referring to a buyer's remorse over a $1K once they come to grips with the 6D. At one point you are bound to feel the pangs of having an outdated AF system.

Well, all I can say it took me years to get to the limits of the 60d af system (and to be sure it's the camera's fault and not mine) - of course if using servo af a lot it's another story, but for general stills shooting the 6d af system might be outdated, but still perfectly usable. And we have to remember that the 5d3/1dx af has to be accompanied by the latest Canon lenses to really shine esp. concerning precision.


The 60D's AF is all cross-type, not too shabby. As for the 6D, Its little improvement over 5D2 /5Dc / 20D :|

Its disappointing when a Rebel series camera has better AF than the same generation FF mid-range camera.

1729
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 6D or 5D Mark III
« on: January 29, 2013, 12:26:11 PM »
The 6D is a microwaved 5D2, which was already a re-cooked 5D, which had its original serving as a 20D. (In terms of actual camera performance, not IQ :P )

If you want a better performing camera, 5D3 is the best route. It won't limit you later on like the 6D could with its AF performance.

One question:  are you making this judgment after having used both cameras, or just because you think this is true?

I can tell you from having used a MKII professionally extensively that in many ways the 6D is a big step upwards from the MKII.  I have not owned or used a MKIII, although I have extensively researched it.  The MKIII is without the superior camera overall, but even that is not straightforward.  There is some give and take with both bodies, and, for me, I concluded that the "give" with the 6D right now was worth the "take".

The truth of the matter is that the 6D actually has more modern technology than any other Canon camera at the moment, even if the form factor and AF are not premium.

Yes, I used the 6D for a day rental and found it's AF nothing particular special from my previous 5Dc or the MK2. I didn't have time to really test it's reported -3EV center point AF, but I could imagine its spectacular in low light as the 5Dc and MK2's we're pretty good.

As for the other features, They're nice fluff but I know it's a camera that could be outgrown if any serious AF situations arrive. IE: off-centered subject approaching camera while shooting Sub-F/2.8.

Perhaps, the 7D spoiled me with these expectations but the MK3 is a camera I will not outgrow for awhile.

1730
Lenses / Re: Lens recommendations for wildlife
« on: January 29, 2013, 12:12:40 PM »
Perhaps an older 300mm 2.8 IS? They're getting cheaper on Evil bay and they hold their value over time quite well.

1731
Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: Chinese aftermarket guns
« on: January 29, 2013, 12:08:11 PM »
I've always felt once you get to the point of stuffing 3+ Speedlites into one softbox...

Why not just use a Alienbee + Vagabond mini? Its about the same $$$, has more power and you only have to take one battery, not 3 packs for each speedlite or a box full of AA's. Sure its manual flash, sure it doesn't have HSS, and sure its alittle more heavy but It can take some serious modifiers.

1732
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 6D or 5D Mark III
« on: January 29, 2013, 12:02:39 PM »
The 6D is a microwaved 5D2, which was already a re-cooked 5D, which had its original serving as a 20D. (In terms of actual camera performance, not IQ :P )

If you want a better performing camera, 5D3 is the best route. It won't limit you later on like the 6D could with its AF performance.

1733
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma Announces New 30mm f/1.4 for APS-C
« on: January 29, 2013, 11:52:35 AM »
Oh Snap. Sigma is on a roll.  8) If they'd make a fast 50mm that wasn't Iffy, I'd might just pick one up.

1734
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Canon may be expensive but...
« on: January 29, 2013, 11:48:39 AM »
#not impressed. :\

OK


Are you  buying pro gears and traveling a lot  I can recommend Profoto from Sweden, used them since first Pro1

Profoto is top-notch equipment but Its not what I'll be needing. Love the Modifiers for them.

4x PCB Einsteins are my current plan.

1735
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Canon may be expensive but...
« on: January 29, 2013, 09:48:31 AM »
#not impressed. :\

1736
Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: Canon 600EX-RT review
« on: January 29, 2013, 01:24:37 AM »
Hay mark, can you use second curtain sync off camera on the 600s?

1737
Lenses / Re: Which 50mm (with AF) is best from f/1.4 - f/2.0?
« on: January 29, 2013, 12:47:15 AM »
50L.

1738
Lenses / Re: Sigma 35 1.4 or Canon 50 1.4 or Canon 24-70 2.8 II
« on: January 28, 2013, 06:12:23 PM »
50mm 1.4 is cheap as chips and is decent for the $$$. I'd recommend it for is neutral perspective.




1739
HDR - High Dynamic Range / Re: Here comes the Sun!
« on: January 27, 2013, 11:35:59 PM »
I remember the solar eclipse last year. Ahh, it's was going to be sweet but it was cloudy. :(

1740
Abstract / Re: Beautiful bokeh! Let me see yours!
« on: January 27, 2013, 11:31:54 PM »
More.

Pages: 1 ... 114 115 [116] 117 118 ... 234