« on: December 17, 2012, 05:08:49 PM »
I would buy a 50L II but the FF mirrorless is also very tempting. I still wouldn't buy a first gen electronic product though.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Hi, I've got a friend in law enforcement who is asking me for a recommendation for lens/camera combo for surveillance. I naturally thought to extend the question to you all!
What would you recommend as a set-up for surveillance? My friend won't be able to spend a ton of time learning the ins and outs of it and he's not interested in photography as an art. He will need to use it time to time at night and won't be using a flash (obviously).
P.S. Budget doesn't necessarily matter. Unless you are concerned about the fact that our taxes will be footing the bill...
It's sharp enough for portraits in the center for me. I love the look.
Have you run your 50L through FoCal with your 5D III bodies? I just wonder what other owners are getting from their 50L?
What is this Velvia, of which you speak so reverently?
A transparent sheet of magic coated in pixie dust... DXOMark gave it a one billion.
(Of course they wouldn't; it has four stops of DR and is super grainy in the shadows at ISO 50 with terrible color accuracy.)
I wouldn't argue with the four stops and terrible colour accuracy, I would argue with the grain in the blacks, don't forget the base is solid black, mind you I always shoot it at iso 40 anyway.
With regards longevity, stick it in the freezer, it will not deteriorate and can be used years past its date, if you can find somebody to actually develop it.
If you love your 7D, You will hate the 6D. After owning the 7D, I wouldn't want anything less than its AF and the 5D3 is that camera for me IMO. You will have to ditch the Kit lens from the 60D with either camera.
+1 million if you are into tracking fast moving objects subjects mostly.
But if you AF and recompose like I do... the 6D AF might even be better.
It will boil down to what you value more... The 6D will give you less noisy images across the ISO spectrum, and probably better IQ overall. Nice interface with a Tablet.
The 7D is noisier, but better AF points across the frame, it has faster burst.
Consumers/enthusiasts might prefer the improvement of images with the 6D, but pros might give a higher rating to getting a high % of keepers and fast action... might prefer the 7D.
If you DO end up keeping the 7D, then Mt. Spokane's lens list is a very good one. For me the 6D seems very enticing for non-pros, especially with the -3EV center AF point and high ISO performance that not only matches the 5diii, but sneaks past it.
You also forgot DR. It's very important for someone who's doing landscape photography and thus 6D seems a near perfect match for me. But if I have money, I won't hesitate going to 5D3 straight. Though IQ-wise 6D is better (almost negligible), 5D3's AF makes the camera more versatile. Having said that, I don't think 6D's AF will hinder me from getting professional quality photos.
RLPhoto, sorry if it was taken out of context. My response was to risc32 though, not you, so I didn't mean to imply that however you are doing things is wrong. Just that I personally prefer to be overpacked rather than underpacked and agree with his post.