October 02, 2014, 12:33:34 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - RLPhoto

Pages: 1 ... 131 132 [133] 134 135 ... 232
1981
EOS Bodies / Re: 6D Top Focus Point Light Bleeding Issue
« on: December 13, 2012, 04:18:55 PM »
It's the curse of the 5D2 sequel.  :o

1982
EOS Bodies / Re: Moving to 6D from 5DII
« on: December 13, 2012, 03:15:09 PM »
That won't be much of an upgrade over the 5D2, Save alittle more for a 5D3.

1983
Lenses / Re: Which lenses will match a 40+MP camera?
« on: December 13, 2012, 03:13:16 PM »
If it can out-resolve the 7D, It should Out-resolve the 46Mp camera.

The 135L is one of those lenses.
This is not a fair test.  All lenses have better resolution in the center area of the image.  APS-C (7D etc) usese this area only. In FF the full field is being used, and the resolution for off enter area will drop. Some might even drop drastically.

It Should outresolve the hypothetical 46mp sensor.

The 135L has outresolved pretty much any camera I've used, so it would be a great candidate for this non-existent sensor.

1984
Lenses / Re: Zoom vs Primes?
« on: December 13, 2012, 02:38:57 PM »
A Good Price might sway me, BigValueInc happened to be one who did.  8)

Seriously though, A 24-70 + 70-200 + 50L + 2x5D3's + 2x580 EX II's is a crap load of weight for weddings or events. The 70-200 is 4 pounds and the 135L is a third of that weight.

I prefer just three small, fast primes with two bodies and the occasional flash.

1985
I'd wait for the 7DII, and continue to use your current equipment. The 7D is a great cam for your uses but its already a long-toothed tiger.

Patience is a virtue, Impatience is an expensive commodity and If you wait a bit longer, You can get the 7DII or the 7D for less $$$. Look at the MK3 prices, They're ridiculous now!

1986
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5D III - Camera of the year 2012
« on: December 13, 2012, 12:09:33 PM »
The 5D3 is the camera of the year, but just not for $3500.  ::)

1987
Lenses / Re: Which lenses will match a 40+MP camera?
« on: December 13, 2012, 11:02:09 AM »
If it can out-resolve the 7D, It should Out-resolve the 46Mp camera.

The 135L is one of those lenses.

1988
EOS Bodies / Re: Are you really serious about 6D?
« on: December 13, 2012, 11:01:08 AM »
Not Remotely interested in a repackaged 5D2, which was a repackaged 20D with a FF sensor.

1989
Lenses / Re: Recommendations for three weeks in the Middle East
« on: December 13, 2012, 10:58:36 AM »
5D3

A Sealed 24-70 2.8.
A Sealed 70-200 2.8.
A Sealed 50mm Prime.
Two Sealed Flashes.

1990
Freaking Everything.

1991
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 50 f/1.4 IS in 2013 [CR2]
« on: December 13, 2012, 08:41:27 AM »
I'll buy one ASAP, but will it replace my 50L? Only time will tell.

1992
Lenses / Re: Zoom vs Primes?
« on: December 11, 2012, 04:30:43 PM »

1993
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: digital camera as light meter
« on: December 11, 2012, 03:11:32 PM »
Yes, you can use a digital camera to meter your scene for Film. Just be sure to use equivalent F-stops from MF to 35mm to get the DOF you need. It works quite well.

1994
Even on my Expensive L Primes, I use the Top of the line B&W MRC Nano XS-Pro UV filters. Its simply superb.

1995
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Am I the only one without 5D3 Problems?
« on: December 11, 2012, 02:50:45 PM »
The 5D3 is the first camera that fully does everything I'd ever want from a camera. That's why I ditched my 7D & 5Dc when I realized I no longer need two seperate bodies for different subject matter.

The only issues are the Assist beam issue, Blinking AF Fix and F/8 AF capability but these are so slight compared to anything before the 5D3.

Pages: 1 ... 131 132 [133] 134 135 ... 232