December 21, 2014, 05:56:20 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - RLPhoto

Pages: 1 ... 136 137 [138] 139 140 ... 237
Lenses / Re: Which lenses will match a 40+MP camera?
« on: December 13, 2012, 11:02:09 AM »
If it can out-resolve the 7D, It should Out-resolve the 46Mp camera.

The 135L is one of those lenses.

EOS Bodies / Re: Are you really serious about 6D?
« on: December 13, 2012, 11:01:08 AM »
Not Remotely interested in a repackaged 5D2, which was a repackaged 20D with a FF sensor.

Lenses / Re: Recommendations for three weeks in the Middle East
« on: December 13, 2012, 10:58:36 AM »

A Sealed 24-70 2.8.
A Sealed 70-200 2.8.
A Sealed 50mm Prime.
Two Sealed Flashes.

Freaking Everything.

Lenses / Re: Canon EF 50 f/1.4 IS in 2013 [CR2]
« on: December 13, 2012, 08:41:27 AM »
I'll buy one ASAP, but will it replace my 50L? Only time will tell.

Lenses / Re: Zoom vs Primes?
« on: December 11, 2012, 04:30:43 PM »

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: digital camera as light meter
« on: December 11, 2012, 03:11:32 PM »
Yes, you can use a digital camera to meter your scene for Film. Just be sure to use equivalent F-stops from MF to 35mm to get the DOF you need. It works quite well.

Even on my Expensive L Primes, I use the Top of the line B&W MRC Nano XS-Pro UV filters. Its simply superb.

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Am I the only one without 5D3 Problems?
« on: December 11, 2012, 02:50:45 PM »
The 5D3 is the first camera that fully does everything I'd ever want from a camera. That's why I ditched my 7D & 5Dc when I realized I no longer need two seperate bodies for different subject matter.

The only issues are the Assist beam issue, Blinking AF Fix and F/8 AF capability but these are so slight compared to anything before the 5D3.

Lenses / Re: Canon 70-200 F/2.8 IS II vs. Tamron 70-200 F/2.8 VC
« on: December 11, 2012, 01:59:19 PM »
TDP just put their ISO 12233 images up. Looks like the Tamron (at least their copy) is inferior to the Canon Mark II where it counts at 200mm & f/2.8:
Bummer, I was hoping to get 200mm at 2.8 with IS/VC at a bargain. If I needed 200mm at f/2.8 for mission-critical stuff and had the moneyI'd probably have to go for the Canon despite its insanely high price.  I think I'll just get the superb Canon 70-200/4L IS used on eBay for $700 or so...

The Canon is the clear choice.

Lenses / Re: 50 1.4 on 5d3 anyone?
« on: December 11, 2012, 01:56:40 PM »
The 50mm 1.4 is a cheap crappy lens. Invest in the 35mm 1.4 L instead.

Its not that terrible.  ::) I've used the 50mm 1.4 Professionally for sometime before getting the 50L.

Its a good lens for the $$$.

60D ergos. Errr....

Still a newer camera than the 5D2 though.

Lenses / Re: Zoom vs Primes?
« on: December 11, 2012, 11:14:17 AM »
I see you also skipped the 85L II, Is that because the 135L is so good?

I owned the 85 but a little too slow for my tastes and I do think the 135 is devine... Stealthy perfect for the street work that I do.

It indeed is a slow mammoth.  ;D

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Second Body
« on: December 11, 2012, 11:01:10 AM »
5D3, because it won't limit you later on and you may find your 7D on ebay of you like the 5D3 alot.

Lenses / Re: Which lenses should I keep/sell
« on: December 11, 2012, 10:57:59 AM »
Sell the 18-270.

Pages: 1 ... 136 137 [138] 139 140 ... 237