Messages

2101

Lenses / Re: Circular Polarizer

« on: June 23, 2012, 09:44:51 PM »

B&w kaisemann polorizers have been my choice for years. Solid and rugged. No IQ loss either.

2102

EOS Bodies / Re: Is it too early for the first "The Canon 1DX sucks" posting?

« on: June 23, 2012, 01:46:52 PM »

So it doesn't have any option to show the dof below 2,8?

That was one of the reasons I wanted the X and not the 5d3. I guess the 5d3 is giving more and more value for money then, lol.

You can change the focus screens on the 1DX with a S type screen for Visable DOF for fast primes. As neuro pointed out, canon hasn't added a custom function to correct the metering in camera. If you can compensate for the missed metering, you can use the S type screen fine.

It's a shame. Canon ditched this feature in the 5D3 and 1Dx. Perhaps they may release a firmware update to correct this, or hold this feature until the 5D4.

2103

EOS Bodies / Re: Is it too early for the first "The Canon 1DX sucks" posting?

« on: June 22, 2012, 12:49:38 PM »

No EG-S focusing screens

Are you sure the standard 1DX focus screen isn't equivelent to an EG-S screen?

Yes, its laser etched.

How is the S - super precision matte made? Isn't it also a laser etched matte?

My point it the standard EC-CV is a new focus screen with this camera. You're already complaining that the software doesn't support EC-S focus screens, maybe that is because the NEW EC-CV screen makes them unnecessary.

Doesn't matter if that's true or not, the Nikon fan bois will grab onto this for years, 'the Canon 1DX doesn't support the EC-S focus screen', 'but, the EC-CV made the EC-S obsolete', 'doesn't matter Canon messed up again, they should have added support for the EC-S screen, my Nikon camera supports every focus screen made since 1937'

EG-S screens are fine Ground glass I believe and yes, it makes a whopping difference for Fast Primes.

2104

EOS Bodies / Re: Is it too early for the first "The Canon 1DX sucks" posting?

« on: June 22, 2012, 11:43:37 AM »

I was just wondering who would be the first...why not me? Here is a warm up for the inner masochist in you...

It is really too late in coming out so I am going to Nikon again.
I have dust in my sensor. Should I return it or cry now?
It is too expensive and I won't stand for it. (Expected response A: It is cheaper than the last one converted Yen in 1995 when adjusted for inflation and the price of rice in Taiwan)
HELP! I don't like the wedding pictures I just took with it. Any ideas? Am I in the right career?
There is banding in ISO over 25,600 and my shoes are too tight when I shoot with it.
I don't understand and don't like the auto focus system whatever it is.
Why is it less available than the new friggin' Rebel? Does that make it more expensive on purpose?
There a color cast when I look at images from the sofa just over the TV in the evening. The D800 doesn't do that.
I 'm not a pixel peeper but...
Maybe if they made a APS-H sensor version it would be perfect and I could afford one.
I think Canon screwed us again, but what L lens is best for shooting my spawn when they are running in the dark?
Will the auto focus be better than the 7D or at least my 40D? Should I sell my Mark II?
I haven't seen one but I am sure Canon screwed us.
What is the best lens you don't own?
Which is best queue to complain about? Adorama, B&H or Amazon?
I have ten thousand dollars I don't know what to do with. Do you?

The 1Dx is the most advanced and complex camera canon has made to date but...

No EG-S focusing screens

Are you sure the standard 1DX focus screen isn't equivelent to an EG-S screen?

Yes, its laser etched.

2105

EOS Bodies / Re: Is it too early for the first "The Canon 1DX sucks" posting?

« on: June 22, 2012, 11:32:10 AM »

I was just wondering who would be the first...why not me? Here is a warm up for the inner masochist in you...

It is really too late in coming out so I am going to Nikon again.
I have dust in my sensor. Should I return it or cry now?
It is too expensive and I won't stand for it. (Expected response A: It is cheaper than the last one converted Yen in 1995 when adjusted for inflation and the price of rice in Taiwan)
HELP! I don't like the wedding pictures I just took with it. Any ideas? Am I in the right career?
There is banding in ISO over 25,600 and my shoes are too tight when I shoot with it.
I don't understand and don't like the auto focus system whatever it is.
Why is it less available than the new friggin' Rebel? Does that make it more expensive on purpose?
There a color cast when I look at images from the sofa just over the TV in the evening. The D800 doesn't do that.
I 'm not a pixel peeper but...
Maybe if they made a APS-H sensor version it would be perfect and I could afford one.
I think Canon screwed us again, but what L lens is best for shooting my spawn when they are running in the dark?
Will the auto focus be better than the 7D or at least my 40D? Should I sell my Mark II?
I haven't seen one but I am sure Canon screwed us.
What is the best lens you don't own?
Which is best queue to complain about? Adorama, B&H or Amazon?
I have ten thousand dollars I don't know what to do with. Do you?

The 1Dx is the most advanced and complex camera canon has made to date but...

No EG-S focusing screens

2106

Lenses / Re: Faster cheapish prime for a wedding?

« on: June 22, 2012, 10:34:05 AM »

I found a few recent photos taken outside with just using a Large 60" scrim. Its a quick setup and get good results for posed photos.

Its great for weddings too if there is harsh 12 o'clock light.

2107

EOS Bodies - For Stills / 5D3 or 200mm f/2?

« on: June 22, 2012, 09:38:09 AM »

I've been considering both of these options for a couple months now. I've already got the cash for either but been waiting a bit on both.

5D3 would be nice upgrade from my classic. Its ready to die soon and don't really want to fix it when it does.

But

I've always liked the stunning shots from the 200mm f/2. Heavy, impractical but amazing. Specialist item.

I'd Like to hear opinions over both.

2108

Lenses / Re: Faster cheapish prime for a wedding?

« on: June 22, 2012, 09:26:23 AM »

The OP has a 70-300 - hence the comment to encourage him to take it.

I am disappointed that you are not prepared to listen or learn from other peoples experience

I still think a 70-200 2.8 is a better option. Extra stop if you need it and if you don't, dont worry about it. He doesn't have to buy one, just rent it.

As for the 70-300L, it more weight and extra bulk to carry on you. Throw it in the assistants bag or leave it in the car.

24-70 on a 5D
70-200 on the 7D
50mm and 85mm primes for creative shots.

Done.

2109

Lenses / Re: Canon EF 14-24 f/2.8L [CR2]

« on: June 21, 2012, 11:55:11 PM »

This is another opportunity for canon to shine and hope they don't mess up on such a great idea as a 14-24L.

2110

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon 35mm f/1.4 L or Canon 50 mm f.1.2 L - for Weddings

« on: June 21, 2012, 11:52:43 PM »

I have just about every current AF Canon L prime between 24mm and 300mm. The 35mm f/1.4L and 85mm f/1.2L II are the best for weddings and stay on my cameras as much as possible. I have several friends who have sent their 50mm f/1.2L's back because the autofocus was so inconsistent and it was recommended to me to not purchase that lens so I'm going to pass that recommendation to you. At the moment I just use the 35mm prime and can crop it to around 50mm easily. If I need the extra focal length I just pull out my 85mm f/1.2L II and skip over the 50mm focal length (recommended if you are on full-frame).

I'm anxiously waiting for Canon to come out with a good 50mm lens. This is the weakest focal length in their line up if you ask me.

Also, if the 35mm f/1.4L gets updated with less CA and weather proofing (why does this lens not have this in the first place?) then I'd say the 35mm f/1.4L II is going to be as close to a perfect prime lens as you can get. Image quality is already amazing.

I've been wanting to pull out all of my primes and do a comparison at night time, maybe that can be my next blog entry. Till then here are some samples:

85mm f/1.2L II at f/2.0 http://markwebbphoto.com/weddingportfolio/h3401c75e#h3401c75e

35mm f/1.4L at f/2.5 http://markwebbphoto.com/weddingportfolio/h2027ab87#h2027ab87

50L is a awesome lens. Am I the only one here who got a good copy? I prefer it over the 35mm for its classic focal length. I suppose ive always been a fan of Henri cartier bressons subtle painting like perspective of the 50mm. No tricks, just a normal view.

2111

Lenses / Re: Would you get a tattoo of a Canon lens?

« on: June 21, 2012, 05:45:27 PM »

Watching TV tonight, one guy shows a tattoo on his left side of the glass lenses in the 50/1.4.

Yes, a tattoo pattern that is the glass elements of the 50/1.4.

Why? Because it is his favourite lens.

Now that is dedication!

How dedicated are you to Canon and Canon equipment?

LoL, What about when the new version is released?

2112

Lenses / Re: Faster cheapish prime for a wedding?

« on: June 21, 2012, 05:40:31 PM »

Hi all,

Hope you can help me out a bit here - I've recklessly agreed to shoot a friend's wedding and wonder if I need something extra in the bag.

My main kit is 7D, 24-70L, 70-300L, 50 1.8, 85 1.8, Sigma 10-20. And my little 400D for backup. Also got a couple of YN560 flashes

So with my fastest being f1.8 and anticipating dark reception etc, I'm wondering if it's worth looking at something faster?

I really can't justify any more posh glass yet (the 70-300 was my silly spend for this year) so if anything it's got to be at the cheaper end - under £500.

I've been considering the 50 f1.4 or, given the crop of the 7D, the Sigma 30 f1.4 - any views on these? I've seen very mixed comments about both.

Or if you think the kit is OK as is, that would be a great reassurance - I'm sure some of you remember First-Wedding Fear!

I also thought of a used 5D classic instead - it's at the outer end of sensible budget but I could always lie to the wife...

Any wisdom would be very gratefully received.

Pete

Thats alot of redundant gear to be using on crop system you have. Ditch the 70-300L, it will be too slow but keep it in an assitants bag or in the car. I doubt it will get much use.

A 135mm f/2 or a 70-200 2.8 will required, but the 85mm might be enough to get by with.

Get a 5D if you can. Great camera and does make your system more versatile.

You need a reflector W/ diffuser scrim for posed shots. It will make your photos amazing.

Get a reportage list!!! Scout ALL LOCATIONS AHEAD OF TIME!!! <-------This is far more important than any equipment.

Be cool and prepared for the worst. It will happen.

2113

Lenses / Re: What should I buy next?

« on: June 21, 2012, 05:24:18 PM »

your fine with lenses but i'd get rid of the 24 2.8. too slow.

A Second Camera Body

Two Flashes

Reflector w/ Diffuser scrim

1 Assistant

And An level head and patience.

You'll do just fine.

2114

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark

« on: June 21, 2012, 05:15:15 PM »

Probably means most 7D and 1Dx owners

And birders are using the 5dIII? Nikon users would get a D7000 or perhaps even a D4. Its not like Nikon only makes the D800 and has abandoned every market but it. By comparison, your 7D would be pretty poor for landscapes compared to a D800E; but, you don't see people ripping you for that, because nobody bought a 7D to go shoot tripod-mounted landscapes. You knew what utensil you were getting; D800 owners do too

If you read the thread you would have seen that I said the d800 was no good for wildlife/sports as it was suggested that the D800 was the best camera

The 5DIII was not in the discussion - but I would guess most birders use the 7D or 1D series

Landscapes were not mentioned in the discussion either - but now you mention it I might take a 1DX for a landscape.

You have no idea what kit I have - so I will ignore the personal remarks at the end

D30 forever. 

2115

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Mother of God - D800 scores 95 DxOMark

« on: June 21, 2012, 05:09:25 PM »

Congrats Canon, Your Failed us this generation.

Too bad Nikon has failed there fanboys for the past 10 Years.

Nikon - 1

Canon - 10

Oh well. I just keep using my 5D.