December 25, 2014, 05:45:45 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - RLPhoto

Pages: 1 ... 146 147 [148] 149 150 ... 237
2206
EOS Bodies / Re: February & March are Announcement Months for Canon [CR2]
« on: November 16, 2012, 11:27:36 AM »
A pro aimed EOS M would be nice.

A 7D2 is way overdue.

And the BIG MP camera will be here soon.

Let's see some innovation canon.

Any bets if it's gonna be same Sensor tech repackaged... or something new?

One thing is for sure. If its new, Its going to be very expensive.

2207
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Canon are you listening...?? NIKON D600
« on: November 16, 2012, 11:16:40 AM »
The resurrection has arrived to CR forums.  :P

It is often interesting to read former predictions after the release of the actual product - the 6d will be no different, I'm esp. looking forward to the "real life" dpreview af comparison between the d600 and 6d, Canon might have found a nice for the 6d after all beyond the obvious gps-tourism.

The 6D will be a repackaged 5D2. If its anymore than this, My expectations are exceeded.

My only gripe is the lack of a multi-selector.

2208
Canon General / Re: Help | Going to buy the Canon 550D/T2i
« on: November 16, 2012, 11:08:16 AM »
Is it possible to sway your decision for a 5Dc + 50mm 1.8/1.4 instead?

2209
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Canon are you listening...?? NIKON D600
« on: November 16, 2012, 11:02:58 AM »
DEAD THREAD.

No, it isn't, you and me just posted :-) ... and it seemed the appropriate thread for this piece of information. Will surely get attention because you cannot unsubscribe to threads in this forum :->

The resurrection has arrived to CR forums.  :P

2210
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Canon are you listening...?? NIKON D600
« on: November 16, 2012, 10:57:30 AM »
DEAD THREAD.

2211
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon 135 f/2L Speaker (Cool, Fun)
« on: November 16, 2012, 10:48:21 AM »
I love my 135L but I'm not so sure if it was designed with acoustic's in mind.  ;D

2212
EOS Bodies / Re: Has Canon entered the Graveyard Spiral?
« on: November 16, 2012, 10:38:40 AM »
The 61-Point AF system from canon is the very best AF ever devised in modern 35mm AF Cameras as of the latest firmware update  ;).

2213
EOS Bodies / Re: February & March are Announcement Months for Canon [CR2]
« on: November 16, 2012, 10:33:02 AM »
After their serious loss of market shares to Nikon in 2012, I expect Canon to return with a vengeance next year for their camera releases. If they still do not fix their sensor problems by 2013, they can kiss their no. 1 market share status goodbye forever.

Canon could hold off nikon if they release a stunning lens line-up too irresistible making Nikon's sensors irrelevant. Afterall, Canon has always bragged about their superior lens line-up.

14-24L
35L II
50L II
85L III
135mm F/1.8L IS USM
100-400L II

If these lenses are released next year, I'll be very comfortable with canon.

2214
EOS Bodies / Re: February & March are Announcement Months for Canon [CR2]
« on: November 16, 2012, 08:39:08 AM »
A pro aimed EOS M would be nice.

A 7D2 is way overdue.

And the BIG MP camera will be here soon.

Let's see some innovation canon.

2215
Lenses / Re: Advice 5d3, wide angle
« on: November 15, 2012, 05:00:19 PM »
If you must have the ultimate wide angle lens period.

Zeiss 15mm F/2.8. Its the very best made. Bar none.

2216
Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon 85mm f/1.8
« on: November 15, 2012, 02:38:30 PM »
I love this lens.  It's small, fast, focuses much faster than the 1.2 and it is a great value.  What's not to love?

I prefer the 100mm F/2.

2217
Lenses / Re: 100 f/2.8L or 135mm f/2L
« on: November 15, 2012, 02:25:45 PM »
85L II = 135L

They're are very, very close in producing great photos. So close I consider them Equal.

2218
Lenses / Re: 100 f/2.8L or 135mm f/2L
« on: November 15, 2012, 01:00:49 PM »
The 100L is almost $100 cheaper and you get macro and IS. IMO it's a better value portrait lens.

The 135L is teh portrait lens. Its a stop faster and has more compression. Plus, you can get used copies for around 750$.

Do you feel that the 135L is the best portrait lens for APS-C?  A typical headshot at 216mm FF-equivalent needs about 12 feet from the subject.

Both lenses are very long on APS-C but I used the 135L with great success on my XSI & 7D.

2219
Lenses / Re: 100 f/2.8L or 135mm f/2L
« on: November 15, 2012, 12:07:49 PM »
The 100L is almost $100 cheaper and you get macro and IS. IMO it's a better value portrait lens.

The 135L is teh portrait lens. Its a stop faster and has more compression. Plus, you can get used copies for around 750$.

2220
Lenses / Re: 100 f/2.8L or 135mm f/2L
« on: November 15, 2012, 10:16:53 AM »
Hi Everybody,

I'm looking into getting a 100 f/2.8L or 135mm f/2L, to do some portrait/ macro work. I won't be using the Macro a ton, but would like the feature. As of today, my budget only allows for one or the other, so I could use your help in deciding between the two.

Right now, I'm using a 24-70 f/2.8L Mark I, and a 50mm 1.4 on a 50D Body.

Recommendations?

The 135L is the best portrait lens for the money. You can get pretty close for light macro work with extension tubes if you really want.

If you do more macro than portraits, The 100L is for you.

Pages: 1 ... 146 147 [148] 149 150 ... 237