Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Please sign this online petition. I do not know if it will do any good, but it is certainly more effective than just sitting around on this forum complaining: http://www.change.org/petitions/adobe-systems-incorporated-eliminate-the-mandatory-creative-cloud-subscription-model#share
Signed and shared.
It is going to depend on each individual image and the way a user perceives it. I do not believe there is any magical number that works for all.
You're killin' my dreams buddy
So, are there images you shouldn't bother using this tool on? How do you know when going through this step isn't going to result in an appreciable difference?
Should I basically just use it like sharpening? View at 100%, start at 0, go up until I see problems, then back it down? Then recheck at normal viewing size?
Remember, your CR2 files grow to very large size, 3X their normal size, so its not something to use on the 800 images you shot last night.
Okay, one more thing. We can complain all we want on this forum, but please, also go to one or more of the public Facebook pages for Adobe, such as https://www.facebook.com/Photoshop?fref=ts and post a comment there.
Companies don't like public humiliation and in this era of the Internet and social media, it can be the most effective tool. Please, go post your opinion and urge others to do so as well.
To the OP...isn't the new Sigma 35mm f/1.4 the one that can be configured via a computer without having to send the lens to Sigma? I thought it had the ability to adjust front / back focusing issues until you get it correct.
Kind regards,
Jason
At some future point, you can pay $$$ for a tool that will let you adjust focus accuracy of the lens so that it may match what you already paid for. Sigma has promised it, but hasn't delivered it.
About two weeks for $59 with software. Not too shabby.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/909813-REG/Sigma_USB_Dock.html
Congratulations KKC. I know you're going to love that lens.
Ok, I'll start the ball rolling.
I own the Canon 135f/2, I admit up front I have never owned a Zeiss Lens, but I've heard/read great things about them, but, the Canon 135f/2 is just a superb Lens, would the Zeiss be any better do you think ?? I understand the Zeiss lenses are Manual Focus, and for me although not a Killer, I have the 17 24 TSE Canons, it does make life a little more difficult, I sold my Leica M9 for this reason, lovely camera but the Manual Focus became an issue for me (Age Factor). Si I'm really interested to hear opinions on the Zeiss versus the Canon.
All this just makes me wonder how long it will be before some innovative company comes along and 'Black Magics' Canon, with an EF mount body having something like 1DX performance at a 70D price.
Especially if that "Black Magic" body incorporated the Sony/D800 type FF sensor and came with the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 as kit lens, but in full frame version. One can dream..
