December 19, 2014, 06:57:01 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - justsomedude

Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 ... 26
256
I'm excited just to see if Canon fixed the arcing issue in the 580EXII.  I've fried both of my 580EXIIs TWICE now, and they are on their 2nd trip back to service due to the dreaded "design flaw" issue called out by LPA Designs.

I hope the 590 is a proper design that allows for ozone venting.  Here in Denver, the dry air creates a real ozone problem, and I'm always worried I'm gonna blow my 580's out whenever I used them in HSS mode.  :(

Please, Canon, fix this damn flash!!!!!!!

257
Lenses / Re: Recommendation 70-200/2.8+2x vs 100-400 f/4-5.6L ?
« on: February 12, 2012, 01:04:25 PM »
I am going to spend money I don't really have on a tele lens later this year for my crop body, so I really want to get the right one. If anyone has experience with these lenses, please give me some advice... here are my thoughts:

What do you shoot the most?  And, how do you plan on implementing a tele-zoom into your workflow?

Intended usage is critical when selecting a lens/focal-length.

258
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS-1D X Delayed?
« on: February 08, 2012, 02:24:37 AM »
Quote from: photogaz
Maybe wait until it comes out before you start moaning.

But I like moaning.  :)

259
EOS Bodies / Re: The Ultimate Question - Buy a 5D MKII today or wait?
« on: February 08, 2012, 02:07:52 AM »
while i agree with you completely, i am interested to know why you chose to shoot that shoot at iso 4000 and f3.5 rather than iso 3200 and f2.8? considering the 70-200 has very little benefit to sharpness in stopping down relative to wide open.

It was a deathly quiet lecture, and I was directed not to shoot excessively to avoid distracting the audience with "clicks".  That said, I knew going in that my image count would be low.  And, as expected, my first sort yielded only 87 high quality "keepers", which will probably be cut down to 40 or less final images that are passed on to the client.  For a client that typically sees 200+ images for my event work, this may come as a surprise (but they understand the shooting limitations).

So... since I knew my shots would be a "one and done" type approach, I dropped the aperture down to improve focus and maximize keepers.  f/2.8 owns when I can shoot as much as I want, but when I can only shoot a couple times a minute - I need to know my focus is on 100% of the time - and f/3.5 gives me that extra security of knowing my DOF won't miss in those types of strict shooting environments.

Just my $0.02.

260
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS-1D X Delayed?
« on: February 08, 2012, 02:03:47 AM »
What makes you so sure about this?

Right????

Given today's announcement of an over-priced ($2,299) and under-performing (non-IS) 24-70mm lens, with a whacked out (82mm) filter size... I have no confidence whatsoever in Canon right now.  I really wonder if Chuck Westfall and the design team are sitting around smoking dank doobies off the profits from all the 5DMKII sales, talkin' about how rootin' tootin' their 21MP flagship is, and how all they need to do is make few "tweaks" and price jumps to beloved gear like the 24-70 to stay competitive.  Prolly a few lines of blow tossed in for good measure too.

This "high end DSLR" coming in "late February" better be gawd damned facking mind blowing considering the D800 and today's joke of a fahckin joke lens release.  Otherwise... I'm gonna start shooting porn with polaroids, selling it as "high class art" and slapping $4,500 price tags on prints for enlarged pictures of hairy vadge.

/rant

How's that for a fahckin rant??????????


261
EOS Bodies / Re: The Ultimate Question - Buy a 5D MKII today or wait?
« on: February 08, 2012, 01:52:39 AM »
I have been renting cameras for sometime now or using my t2i. I went to buy a
5D Mk II today and could not pull the trigger out of fear that a new one could be released anyday now? As we all know this is an ongoing problem for many canon users looking to upgrade at this time so I want hear people thoughts.   Buy a 5d MK II today or Wait?

I got a 5D during the Xmas sales and I'll never regret it.  For $2k it's the best frickin' bang for your buck for any DSLR on the market right now. 

Shot last night... 4000 frickin ISO... f/3.5... dark auditorium... 100feet away... 70-200mm lens at f/3.5 (IS on)...



You just can't beat that for $2k right now.  Get the MKII -- you won't regret it.

262
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: D800 - Sample Photos
« on: February 07, 2012, 11:58:19 AM »
the landscape images i saw look not better then the ones from a 5D MK2.

so im still skeptical.....

I don't think you're understanding my argument...

It's not about being "better", it's about pixel density and DPI.  Stretching a 22MP image to a 6-foot wide print is worlds away from stretching a 37MP image to a 6-foot wide print.  The less stretching required, the better clarity on the resultant print.

263
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: D800 - Sample Photos
« on: February 07, 2012, 11:38:13 AM »
But those fingers are a bit noisy... :)

That hand is outside the DOF...  look at the hand on the opposite side of the frame.  Tacky sharp.

264
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: D800 - Sample Photos
« on: February 07, 2012, 11:26:40 AM »
and how many couples order billboard prints?

if i read here in this forum i wonder how there can be room on this little planet for all the big prints people do.  :P

I regularly print 62" wide fine art landscapes - and sometimes bigger - for gallery and corporate sales.  I use PrefectResize/Genuine Fractals to get the image sizes I need... but I'd prefer to have more pixels provided natively out of camera and less stretching to do in post.

Because of this I, for one, see a huge need for 36MP+ in a FF sensored body, so long as the quality isn't compromised and I'm sure many other fine art landscape photographers agree.  Now Nikon is proving it can be done.

My curiosity is certainly piqued.

265
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: D800 - Sample Photos
« on: February 07, 2012, 11:20:33 AM »
I'm considering switching to Nikon mainly because i'm sick of the Canon autofocus.

Don't get me started on Canon AF.   :-\

266
. I am still a "prosumer" and have not to this date sold any prints for any money.

so what do you need 36 MP for? im puzzled!


+1

wtf?

267
EOS Bodies / Canon CPS Preorders :: Gold vs. Platinum
« on: February 06, 2012, 12:42:17 AM »
I saw in the 1DX Update that Platinum CPS members get priority ordering on the 1DX body.  But, my question is, do Gold members also get an opportunity once the platinum notifications have gone out?  Or are they just like any other member of the general public at that point?


268
United States / Re: Lens suggestion for a 1600 budget
« on: February 05, 2012, 12:01:53 AM »
Buy a used 70-200 f/2.8L IS (1st version)...

http://www.sportsshooter.com/classitem.html?id=35786

Take the left over $200 and get a battery grip.  :)

269
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon 7D for studio work
« on: February 01, 2012, 01:49:49 PM »
But I do have both a 7D and a 40D, and IMHO (and yes I get flamed for this, but I'm not alone in my opinion) the 40D has superior IQ (specifically sharpness.)

I've run acorss this sort of statement several times.  I think there's a technical issue at the root of this - the 7D has a higher-resolution sensor and a stronger AA filter to go with it, and thus the resulting images require a bit more sharpening in post. 

I think this is why we may actually see a 7D - or some other crossover body - as the "high end dSLR" in February before a 5D.  The 7D has gotten panned across the board for IQ and AF issues.  There are still people who stick by the "you're-just-too-stupid-to-understand-the-powerful-7D" mantra, but dozens of reviews and tests show that "fuzziness" and lack of clarity in resultant images is a repeatable and very real issue on the 7D.

Furthermore, the fact that Canon continues to service my 7D for images quality issues, totally free of charge and well outside of my warranty window, says a heck of a lot about what they must know internally regarding the problems with this body.

Let's keep in mind, the 7D was really a first for this type of body from Canon.  Some bumps along the way were to be expected, and as first adopters many of us had to accept the issues that often come with a brand new model.  I expect a 7D mkII to be vastly improved... I'm sure Canon expects the same.

270
Lenses / Re: *HELP* Alternatives to Canon EF-S 10-22mm
« on: January 28, 2012, 10:15:41 AM »
Don't forget, the Tokina 11-16 mkii is coming this spring...

http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php/topic,2995.msg63705.html#new

I'd wait for that if I were you. 

Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 ... 26