December 19, 2014, 04:10:26 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - justsomedude

Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 26
271
This is the most exciting CR news I've seen in ages.  I'm actually more excited about this  rumor than a 5D mkiii.  Why - you may ask?  I had terrible auto-focus issues with the Tokina 11-16 on my 7D, going so far as to get Tokina to admit it was a real issue.  Which they finally did, almost...  check my blog post on this issue:

http://www.akphotodenver.com/2011/06/14/tokina-acknowledges-pairing-issue-with-11-16mm-f2-8-lens-and-canon-7d/

If a true update is in the mix, I'll be looking to pick one up as soon as it drops.  Tokina's 11-16 ultra-wide is legendary, I just want all the AF points to work.  Granted, I typically use it in manual focus mode, but a lens should be compatibale with all of a body's focus options.

Just my %0.02.


272
EOS Bodies / Re: New 5D MK2 Owner
« on: January 07, 2012, 03:48:33 PM »
Shoot... Shoot... Then shoot some more...

+1... +1... +100...

 :D

273
EOS Bodies / Re: What do you want from the 5D mk III
« on: January 05, 2012, 12:18:14 AM »
I'd like it to be weather sealed.

 :o

274
EOS Bodies / Re: 7D sensor poll
« on: January 02, 2012, 09:13:50 PM »

+1

The 7D will always remain a crossover body from the pro-sumer to the pro line.  Also, as neuroanatomist so eloquently stated, the crop factor of a 7D body gives your lenses extra reach.   This makes the 7D body dual purpose, and a great supplement to a full frame body like the 5D; it expands your creative possibilities.

That said, I'd like the 7D to stay APS-C crop.

So what is the upgrade path from the 7D then? Previously the 1.3 crop 1D4 which meant you didn't lose all the 'crop reach' which all the 7D fans seem to love. Is it the ff 1DX which means you lose all the 'crop reach'. Wont you be upset with nowhere to go from the noisy prosumer body?

I think it would remain the same... the upgrade path from the 7D would be the 5D or 1D.  I almost see the xxD line being eliminated.  The T3i and 60D are very close in price, with no huge difference in feature set.  The two lines are almost identical.  Also, Canon took a lot of crap for the changes they made from the 50D to the 60D bodies, such as going from magnesium-alloy to a plastic body and adding that tilt-swivel LCD.  Many saw the 60D as a downgrade from the 40D and 50D models, at least with respect to being "semi-pro" versus "enthusiast" type camera bodies.

That said, if the xxD line is eliminated, the T3i, T4i, etc. may become Canon's new baseline standard for the "enthusiast" market.  The plastic bodies, tilt-swivel LCDs, and marketing focus towards video will remain.  Then, the 7D, 6D (if it ever comes to fruition), etc. series will bridge the "semi-pro" gap to the 5D and 1D "pro" series.  The words in quotes are my own definitions for the sake of breaking down Canon's markets. 

And, for what it's worth, this is all based on assumption from my own personal "vibe" of the Canon's development progress, and tidbits I get from place like CanonRumors and other sources on the internet.

275
EOS Bodies / Re: 7D sensor poll
« on: January 02, 2012, 01:25:45 PM »
I think it's a non-starter, the 7D line will remain APS-C.  They could release a new APS-H camera someday, but it won't be a 7-series.  APS-H means incompatible with EF-S lenses, which is why we won't see a 7D with APS-H.

Personally, I'm hoping for an APS-C body with 1-series build and AF.  If I'm limited by focal length (which, IMO, is the main reason to use any crop sensor, 1.3x or 1.6x), the 1.6x will put more pixels on target.  So, an APS-C sensor with IQ improvements would be better than APS-H.

+1

The 7D will always remain a crossover body from the pro-sumer to the pro line.  Also, as neuroanatomist so eloquently stated, the crop factor of a 7D body gives your lenses extra reach.   This makes the 7D body dual purpose, and a great supplement to a full frame body like the 5D; it expands your creative possibilities.

That said, I'd like the 7D to stay APS-C crop.

276
EOS Bodies / Re: weird "grid lines" in 5DII pictures
« on: December 25, 2011, 03:49:42 PM »
To the OP, I had a similar pattern noise issue this past summer with my 7D, which was severe vertical striping.  See my post on it at DPReview, here (image included at link)...

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1019&message=39424620

The body had been back to Canon Irvine numerous times for this issue (in addition to repeated AF issues), with only "electrical adjustments" being listed as work done on my service reports, and Canon service reporting that the body was within normal performance specifications.  After this (intermittent) noise issue cropped up again in late September, I sent my 7D into the Irvine facility again with sample prints and a very sternly worded letter that the issue was not fixed, that I assumed a faulty sensor was at play, and that I demanded a complete repair or a full replacement body.

My repairs with Canon usually take less than 10 business days door to door.  Interestingly, this trip was exactly 3 weeks door to door - the longest turn around I've ever had with Irvine.   Maybe it was a seasonal issue, but I'm assuming more work was being done on my camera.  This was confirmed when my camera arrived and I read the service report.  It was EXTREMELY vague, but in a nutshell it said something along the lines of, "testing was done and it was determined that a faulty internal component was producing noise in images.  The internal component was replaced."

This was the first time in my 7D's seven visits to Canon that an actual part was replaced.  I'm assuming the sensor was swapped out, but I'll never really know.  If your noise issues persist, I'd suggest sending the body into Irvine with image samples, and a firm letter demanding concrete results.

Best of luck.

277
EOS Bodies / Re: Happy Holidays!
« on: December 25, 2011, 03:35:12 PM »
Merry Christmas from AK Photo in Denver! 

 :D

278
EOS Bodies / Re: Quick question about 5D mark II
« on: December 23, 2011, 02:40:54 PM »
I just got my new 5D mark II. When I take photos , it gives a totally different click sound than my T1i, do you think something wrong with the piece? should I be concerned?, however the pics I took are excellent

5D sounds different from my 7D.  Totally different camera, totally different parts.  APS-C vs. Full Frame, etc.

Ignore the sound... go shoot!   ;D

279
Software & Accessories / Re: Printing/sizing/online HELP!
« on: December 23, 2011, 02:21:52 PM »
Hello there!
I posted last week, the topic of printing. I decided to go over to Mpix.com and order a few prints.
When I uploaded the images I wanted printed, they offered some sizes and not others, so I chose a size I thought would be best.
I received them in the mail today, with an issue. The IQ was not even close to what it is on my computer, and more importantly the images were not scaled to fit. A large portion of almost every photo is chopped off the bottom, including a square photo which was blown up and cut in half. Did I miss something while ordering?

Any help would be appreciated. I'm new to printing, and would really like to avoid a $20 mishap again.

Leopard,

Check my reply to your other thread here... http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php/topic,2557.msg54712.html#msg54712

I touch on some items regarding image size, resolution, and sharpening that you might find useful.

280
Software & Accessories / Re: Exporting in Lightroom 3
« on: December 23, 2011, 02:15:22 PM »
Editing is fine, but for some reason my final pieces of work are not as sharp as they should be.

Leopard,

It looks like you've opened the can-of-worms that is digital printing.  First, don't be worried, with a few steps and due diligance, you'll be getting the quality results you want.

A few things to know when exporting from Lightroom for physical prints...

  • MOST IMPORTANT:  When working in the digital realm for editing/printing, it is imperative that you have a calibrated monitor and that you are working under optimal lighting conditions to view image details on an LCD screen!  Something like the Pantone HUEY Pro will give you decent calibration at a fair price.
  • Following up on the point above - be aware that most "cheap" LCD monitors packaged with computers these days are TN displays (Twisted Nematic - a type of LCD technology), that have limited color depth, contrast detail, and viewing angles.  Most graphics designers use IPS displays (In-Plane Switching) which give them access to more details of the image.  Of course, IPS displays cost a whole heck of a lot more than TN displays.  If you plan on committing to the digital realm, an upgrade to your monitor will help you see all the detail of your images, and give you more control over your editing process.
  • When exporting from Lightroom, it is imperative that you embed a "printer profile" for the printer that will be making your prints.  Contact Mpix, or search their Help pages, and see if they have a printer profile available.  If they do, install it in the directory that Lightroom looks for profiles, and apply it on export.  It is one of the options in the image drop-down pane (where you select JPG or TIFF, etc.).  If no profile is available from Mpix, you may need to embed your exports in an sRGB color space - but ask them first for what they recommend for B&W printing.
  • Keep your resolution high at export.  240dpi (dots per inch) is a pretty good baseline standard for printing 4x6, 5x7, and 8x10s.  Just make sure your math works out for your print size.  For example, if you are printing an 8x10 at 240dpi, but the dimension of your image on the longest side is only 2000pixels (say you've cropped it), your maximum print size is only 8.33 inches - so your printing company will actually have to enlarge your image to cover the size of print you ordered.  That can give you artifacts in the final print - which you want to avoid.  To calculate your available print dimensions, simply divide your image dimensions by your print resolution, or 2000pixels/240dpi in the example I provided. 
  • On the flip side to the note above, it's totally OK to have an oversized image for a smaller print.  Say, after divding your image dimensions by your print resolution of 240, you have a calculated document size of 16x24 ... that's just fine for making smaller prints, because detail is never lost in reduction, only when blowing-up to larger prints.  That 16x24, however, should be considered as your maximum possible print size for that resolution. 
  • Minimize sharpening inside Lightroom.  While sharpening can look good on screen, it can provide hideous results when printing to paper.  Keep this in mind, and try not to get too crazy with your sharpening sliders in the Details pane.
  • Do not do ANY sharpening in Lightroom's Export options panel.  If you've already added sharpening inside the Details pane in your processing work, added sharpening at export will only make that graininess worse.  **Disable all sharpening at the final export step!

I hope this helps!

281
Software & Accessories / Tripod w/ Spiked Feet and Air Travel?
« on: December 23, 2011, 01:48:33 PM »
Has anyone ever run into issues traveling with spiked feet on a tripod as a carry-on item?  I just got some spiked feet for my Manfrotto while visiting family on holiday, and I'm worried TSA will confiscate them.  I'm considering shipping them back home so I don't get forced into throwing them away at the airport.

Any advice/experience on this matter?  Thanks!

282
EOS Bodies / Re: What do you do with old bodies?
« on: December 22, 2011, 06:29:42 PM »
Dump them near the graveyard propably.

+1

Unfortunately, bodies are disposable.  They are simply a tool in an artist's arsenal.  As they get updated by newer bodies with better features, they move towards obselesence and their value decreases. 

The real investment in photography is high quality glass, as great lenses can last you decades.   Your bodies, on the other hand, will come and go with greater frequency.

283
Lighting / Re: PocketWizard FlexTT5 and 580exII RF Issues?
« on: December 20, 2011, 10:35:39 AM »
Haha, funny stuff ;D Yeah, well, they only reason I tell things like they are, is because I know how insanely mad I get when things don't frikkin' work like they suppose to! And really, me saying that is just to give others a different opinion than what you get from a commercial for a product. Not all things are as good as they claim to be, just saying.

And what do you mean "supporting Alien Bees" ? I haven't used them, but are they ETTL? I didn't think so? The Odin supports ALL studio-flashes, and ETTL is restricted to Canon, JUST like PW's, so I don't get that point. The Odin is the only trigger that works straight out of the box down to 1/8000s with my Elinchromes and other studio-flashes. Did you find those sync-cables in your PW box? nope! That was extra. And you need soft shield, blocking the display, and af-assist, oh wait, pw don't support that  ::) and I see people hanging their PW's from a Canon OC-e3 cable to get distance from the flash, wtf... I mean, I'm an Apple fan, but this seems much like the Iphone-diciples, they want an Iphone4 no matter what it doesn't do. Android does everything better, but I want an Iphone, why? because it's an iphone... I choose stability over a brand name, just me I guess.....

Viggo, I'm just saying that it works with my Alien Bee setup.  See the adapter here...

http://www.pocketwizard.com/products/transmitter_receiver/ac9%20alienbees%20adapter/

I didn't mean to offend you, or your choice of Phottix.  I'm sure it's a fine product for you.

284
Lighting / Re: PocketWizard FlexTT5 and 580exII RF Issues?
« on: December 19, 2011, 06:56:05 PM »
Why don't people listen?

Because nobody likes you.




Just kidding.   :D

Honestly, I have to say that after this experience I'd still prefer to stay with PocketWizard.  Their support for numerous brands of flash, including AlienBees, provides a tremendous amount of versatility and flexibility to photographers - and most importantly - me.  I've yet to find another ETTL radio trigger that is equaled in that regard.  Furthermore, in all their history, the 580exII is the only flash they've encountered repeated problems with.  To me, this information (in conjunction with their white paper) points more to the 580 as the culprit than the PW Flex.   

I'll probably be hanging around with them for a while, and more than likely just switching the make or model of flash units I choose to employ for off-camera use.

285
Lighting / Re: PocketWizard FlexTT5 and 580exII RF Issues?
« on: December 19, 2011, 12:45:37 PM »
Thanks for the input, everyone.  After doing some thorough reading/research, I opted for (3) FlexTT5s to complement my (2) 580exIIs.  Based on information available, and some DIY testing done by photogs about the internet, the FlexTT5 had much better range as the primary transmitter than did the MiniTT.

I got the units last week, and had some great results doing indoor testing.  See sample of my dad below...



The units were no more than 20' from my camera body during my in-home tests, and everything fired fine.  I decided to implement them on a wedding gig yesterday (church allows flash), and for the first 15 minutes, all worked well.  Even shooting 100' plus away from the back of the balcony with the FlexTT5s on stands behind concrete columns at the floor level (full soft shield + shoe were implemented), I got consistent triggering/ETTL.

Then - catastrophe hit.  I was struck with the total failure documented here on both of my 580's.  They started doing the full power dumps, with no regulated output whatsoever.  I was able to finish the ceremony with natural light without issue, and my assistant had two 580's that worked flawlessly for the portrait shoot and reception.  We worked them just as strenuously as my two 580's for the rest of the night, yet no failures occurred.  I found that to be a little odd.

I immediately called PocketWizard this morning to find out more about this failure of my 580's.  Based on the research done in the link previously provided, PocketWizard claims the 580's design is the fault of this failure.  The CS rep I spoke with did say that Canon typically covers the IGBT repair under warranty, and that the repair should basically eliminate the problem from ever occurring again.  It's still frustrating being without some of my primary portable lighting gear for a few weeks as I move into boudoir/Valentine's shoot season.

grrrr.


Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 26