September 21, 2014, 02:27:22 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - awinphoto

Pages: 1 ... 114 115 [116] 117 118 ... 133
1726
PowerShot Cameras / Re: Tonights Announcements [CR2]
« on: August 22, 2011, 05:02:43 PM »
Wow, kind of shocked the new P&S are still using digic iv.
More than shocked. Is Digic V still not ready yet then?

Somehow I dont think they would want their new processer debuted on a P & S.  I'm sure they would rather tout a new processor on a new camera, anyone hear of the 5d mark 3 or 1ds mark iv/v???? 

1727
Landscape / Re: Old sensor - broken pixels or noise?
« on: August 16, 2011, 12:06:52 PM »
One tsunami later and I am still waiting...

Well I guess I'm in the same boat waiting for the 5d to rear it's ugly head so I can nab one when it gets released... It seems I might as well be looking for big foot or the loch ness monster because they may be easier to spot now a days ahaha

1728
Landscape / Re: Old sensor - broken pixels or noise?
« on: August 16, 2011, 10:37:05 AM »
Yeah, Lightroom is cheaper than a new 5Dmk3 will be, but I want a new camera!  So let's use the "my old 300D has hot pixels that ruin my shots" as an excuse and say nothing to the missus about all this post processing stuff.

Agreed?

I wish my missus was as dumb as that...

aw hell, i shoot professionally and I rarely get away with the "this camera will pay for itself and then some within weeks" with my wife... I might as well drop kick my camera to convince her I need a new one haha. 

1729
Canon General / Re: Scans
« on: August 11, 2011, 01:11:40 PM »
I sounted out what I want done, there are 451 slides.  Scancafe can do that for $330 (4000 dpi, JPG+TIFF, dust/scratch removal)

For my time, I'd rather spend $300 than 100 hours!  And as long as they come back as TIFF, they can essentially be treated as RAW and manipulated in ACR.

I have never used scancafe and cannot speak for them but for that many slides it seems like that's kinda a low price or will have a ridiculous turnaround time... either way i'd err on the "if it sounds too good to be true..."  but it it works out well and doesn't look shabby, more power to you.   

1730
EOS Bodies / Re: Coming Tech & More [CR2]
« on: August 11, 2011, 10:32:07 AM »
Interesting... but I was already holding my breath on some of the other rumors... I dont know if i have any more ability to hold any more for this one.   :o

1731
Canon General / Re: Scans
« on: August 11, 2011, 10:06:41 AM »
I would second the idea of scanning your own transparencies... I use the epson 4490... It allows you to can up to medium format (if you shot medium format) and even has the ICE technology to remove scratches/dust on your slides.  I paid a "local" company where I live to drum scan some large format slides i shot but the overall quality wasn't as good and clean as the espon pumps out.  (just dont bump or cause a lot of vibrations during scanning to have the cleanest scan possible, but it could save you hundreds/thousands compared to outsourcing and you can make sure it's exactly how YOU want it.  If you want to scan it to blow up to 20x30 natively, you can without worrying another company will screw it up. 

1732
EOS Bodies / Re: Where to buy the to be announced body(s)?
« on: August 10, 2011, 03:34:09 PM »
I used to shop BH all the time until I started shopping Adorama.  Dont ask my why but adorama just comes to mind quicker than BH so when I do pricing, they tend to go in my browser first.  I've had great service with both companies however be aware of their holiday schedules, especially any time september or after.  Both take frequent holidays and especially around christmas has a cut-off in which if you need equipment quickly and miss that cut off, they wont ship until they get back from their holiday which can really get you in a bind.  I missed that cut off 2 years ago and needed gear quick... had to pay out the nose at a local store so I had what I needed for a paying photo shoot. 

1733
Lenses / Re: Which 50mm Macro lens is a better buy?
« on: August 08, 2011, 08:05:32 PM »
TDP is a great resource.  If you are using the 100mm L I think you will be slightly disappointed with the 50mm overall.  The build is similar to the 50 1.4... small manual focus ring... lots of play in the ring... AF is kinda slow and noisy... Optically, compared to standard regular primes and zooms, it is very very good.  Compared to many of the L optics, it isn't as good.  Ziess is very nice but you pay the premium.  With the 5d, the 60mm ef-s is out, but perhaps if you have other primes are happy with you can try extension tubes... Also if you feel adventurous you can try sigmas offering or others but be aware of sample variations. 

1734
Lenses / Re: Which 50mm Macro lens is a better buy?
« on: August 08, 2011, 05:46:38 PM »
I had the 50mm 2.5 macro... it's a great lens depending what your expectations are (and noisy if you are used to USM)... I dont think it's as sharp (overall) as my 50 1.4, but the 1.4 is not a macro per se.  The 60mm ef-s macro gets good reviews from what I see.  The zeiss i'm sure is a superior lens optics wise but so is the price point and manual focus for that matter of fact. 

1735
Canon General / Re: 580EXII SpeedFlash
« on: August 08, 2011, 11:23:03 AM »
I've heard about the technical on how these puppies collect battery power by building up power within it's wiring so it has plenty of power to release within the flash.  It used to be common practice (whether you use high power strobes to on/off camera flashes) to "dump" the power by firing the flash right before you turn it off/disconnect power and I still do that to this day.  On the old flashes you could audibly hear the power within the flash by giving off a slight hum but you dont get that anymore with the modern flashes.  I would still recommend dumping power by pressing the test/flash button to fire the strobe then turn it off immediately.  If this doesn't help your battery situation, take the batteries out after usage or send it to canon to look at.  Has your flash always done this or just recently?  Perhaps after a long time of power build-up the flash got some damage within the circuit controller that is suppose to tell the flash to stop drawing power?  This is assuming the flash is completely "off" when you shut it down rather than in hibernation/sleep mode due to inactivity? 

1736
EOS Bodies / Re: DSLR Video. Sony is about to kick Canon's you know what
« on: August 03, 2011, 02:09:19 PM »
Competition is GOOD!  I believe its the main reason for progress in most endeavors.

I can imagine that Sony was smarting after the 5D MK II came out, and saw a need to do one step better.  Sony has lots of video knowhow, and I am happy to see them put it to use.

We should welcome it, because it will make the competition fish or cut bait!

Couldn't have said it better  :D

1737
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mk III storage
« on: August 03, 2011, 01:02:44 PM »
I also like the build of CF cards... one time I was at an event and changed cards mid event... put the old card in the cheap plastic case they come with and put it in my shirt pocket... Well after everything was said and done, i went home, put my clothes in the washing machine without thinking, turned it on, and went to bed.  The next morning when putting the clothes in the dryer the card fell out of my shirt pocket... crap... once i opened the cheap case, drained the water inside, and let the card dry out, I was able to plug it in and retrieve EVERYTHING on that card. 

I also heard in a seminar once that photographers and news journalists found destroyed cameras weeks after the 9-11 disaster during the clean up (presumed to be people who either parished during the event and or dropped from the buildings) and they were able to plug in the CF cards and retrieve images from that event.  Obviously i cannot verify this but if true, wow. 

1738
Well, my budget is complicated. I don't want to spend over $500 on the tripod and ball head for now, though it it would make a significant difference I might stretch up to $650. Height is important to me, and I also need something that can handle itself on uneven ground (trails, for example). If my budget is unrealistic, please let me know.

In short, I need...

  • Flexible, sturdy legs for uneven ground such as trails, hikes, etc.
  • Under $650, preferably under $500. May save up to stretch further if necessary.
  • Stable and capable of handling a 300mm zoom lens in the future.
  • Easy to travel with (though I may just get a second, cheaper, foldable tripod for traveling purposes)
  • Over 60" tall.

My thoughts: you don't need to spend a lot of money on a tripod if you're just trying to stable a 3-4lb set-up for landscapes or long exposures. You don't need a fancy head. you just need something that will lock down and not fall over. Buy used if you can. Almost everyone has a couple a tripods they don't use. Get theirs. Then, if it's not working out - upgrade. .

Tripods are probably the one thing people skimp out on the most... can you blame them?  Spending $1000-2000, another couple grand combined on lenses, etc... Whats next, a tripod?  But then again a good tripod would be like buying a good car... If you buy the right one, it can last you almost forever.  If you skimp out on one that "just locks down", you may have failures at bad times like I did with in the river shot.  Like a good car, or lens for that sake, it can last you a long time, longer than any modern camera.   

1739
Well shoot $500 on a tripod will give you a very fine tripod.  Unlike cameras/lenses there are a plethora of different brands all competing in this market, each with it's own quirks and goods/bads/uglys.  I cannot recommend any stronger than to not go by blind faith of the internet on this purchase because in many ways, you may become as intimate with your tripod as part of your gear as the camera itself...  But what I would do is run some searches, I can even do an initial search on adorama... search under your criteria... 60" check, carbon fiber or light weight aluminum... heavy load (the more the load, the more stable it should be)... and then print out your list and take it with you to the store... compare prices, compare tripods... they should have several out on display... find those particular models on your list (and even some that may not be on that list as long as it's meeting your criteria via specs).  Hint... even if the tripod is not on display but in stock, if the camera store thinks theres a potential of a sale, they'll help you take out the tripod and test them...  anything to get a sale.  Lastly, there are 2 heights to consider... a height with a closed center column and a height with an extended column... ONLY USE THE CENTER COLUMN FOR EMERGENCY OH CRAP SITUATIONS.... you severely lose stability and do not rely on that to always be there for you. 

http://www.adorama.com/catalog.tpl?op=itemlist&cat1=Tripods&cat2=Tripod%20Legs%20%26%20Leg/Head%20Combos&cat3=Leg%20%26%20Head%20Combo%20for%20Still%20%26%20Video&Feature2=10%20To%2019.9%20Lbs&Feature3=60%22%20to%2072%22&Startat=61

http://www.adorama.com/BGMT294A3327.html

http://www.adorama.com/BGMT294A3324.html

This is a good generic lists of aluminums and carbons meeting your broad needs of 11 plus load weight and 60" tall min.  They are head/leg combos but you can get more specific and better gear mixing and matching... I stand by my recommendations on heads earlier and already gave you those links but for legs $300 an under...

http://www.adorama.com/catalog.tpl?op=itemlist&cat1=Tripods&cat2=Tripod%20Legs%20%26%20Leg/Head%20Combos&cat3=Tripod%20Legs%20for%20Still%20%26%20Video&Feature3=10%20to%2019.9%20Lbs&Feature4=60%22%20to%2072%22&Startat=1

Broad search...

some highlights:

http://www.adorama.com/BG055CXPRO3.html

http://www.adorama.com/FPTPF1228.html  flashpoint is adoramas house brand... you probably wont be able to test them at a local store but they are at a great value...

http://www.adorama.com/GTMT8260.html

http://www.adorama.com/SLP500DXLBK.html  I've used this one... true to description and light weight despite look.

http://www.adorama.com/SLP723CF.html

http://www.adorama.com/SLP823CF.html

Anyways heres some quick suggestions to look at (at the stores...)  play with them and see what feels the best for you and your budget.  Good luck once again.   


1740
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mk III storage
« on: August 02, 2011, 06:37:09 PM »
After Canon made a point of emphasizing (with the releases of the 50D and the 5D mark II) the forward compatibility with these cameras and UDMA Compact Flash cards, I think that's where Canon is really expecting the technology to evolve into.  I cant see them switching to other cards, no matter their popularity, if they impede speed or performance of the system and buffer, especially as the MP's increase.  CFast, there seems to be so little information yet alone actual products on hand to warrant to camera dedicated to them.  For the speed factor, I hope the new 5d has 2 CF slots so the camera wont suffer due to a slower card. 

Pages: 1 ... 114 115 [116] 117 118 ... 133