August 22, 2014, 12:06:02 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - LSV

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
1
Photography Technique / Re: APOLLO missions - image inconsistencies
« on: August 18, 2014, 03:16:09 PM »
This is a gag post, right?  I went to CR and the Onion site breaks out.

2
Canon General / Re: Another Canon Medium Format Mention
« on: August 11, 2014, 05:42:04 PM »
Just don't believe it. If they are looking at MF now they're about twenty five years too late.

My thoughts exactly.

Developing a medium format camera today is way more complicated than it was in the film days and the market is much smaller and shrinking all the time. If Canon and Nikon were uninterested in medium format when it was actually a viable market, why would they invest in it now?

On another thread, I posted a reference to an estimate from Leica that the worldwide market for medium format is only 6,000 units annually. Hasselblad has a grand total of 180 employees according to their own website, not exactly a huge operation.

There are other markets that are far more promising.

To paraphrase an ancient proverb: “The best time to develop a MF camera was 25 years ago. The second best time is now.”

3
Animal Kingdom / Re: Show us your Hooters (Owls)
« on: July 21, 2014, 03:05:16 AM »
Burrowing Owl

4
Lenses / Re: Best short telephoto?
« on: July 05, 2014, 01:29:57 PM »
I'll go out on the proverbial limb here and recommend the Panasonic Lumix FZ200 bridge camera, which I own. It has an equivalent 25-600/2.8 constant aperture zoom and provides plenty of IQ for situations like this. And ... no one would ever think you were a "professional" with this camera!

Please do not repeat dishonest Panasonic marketing crap: at equivalent 25-600mm, it is f/16, NOT f/2.8

5
Lenses / Re: World Cup started - no sign of 100-400L Mk2
« on: June 14, 2014, 02:46:17 PM »
I used my just released 7D2 with the pre-production 100-400 II at the World Cup championship game in Russia as the US team bested Brazil 3-0.  Then, I traveled back in time to post this.

6
EOS Bodies / Re: When Does the Year of the Lens Start?
« on: May 03, 2014, 02:55:47 AM »
No doubt the source must have said "Fiscal Year of the Lens," but CR guy got too excited and only heard Year of the Lens.

7
Reviews / Re: Why the DxO bashing?
« on: February 09, 2014, 03:28:02 PM »
I think, at this point, I and probably others, would like to hear from the Original Poster.  We've heard passionate answers with supporting claims and counter arguments.  Is the OP satisfied with the answers and with which explanations does he agree?  I learned a lot and big thanks to CR members for the education.

8
Canon General / Re: Deals at Adorama: 600EX-RT, Canon EOS 6D kit and more
« on: January 28, 2014, 01:41:47 AM »
Thank you, CanonRumors.  I've been looking for the 430EX II flash and the price was great.

9
Lenses / Re: EF 400mm f/5.6L IS on the Way?
« on: December 27, 2013, 01:58:18 PM »
I enjoy both zooms and primes. But to say an improved 100-400 will make the 400 prime effectively replaced, well there are many prime tele shooters (BIRDERS!) who will have a field day with that comment. I think they both have their place.

Now, which will I get?

That my friend is the real conundrum.
Rent them both :)

I tried but Roger said he didn't have any Unicorns farting rainbows.
See if he has any beachfront property in Memphis ;D

Which Memphis?  The new one in Tennessee or the original Memphis in Egypt.  I have some spare bitcoin rattling in my pocket.

10
EOS Bodies / Re: 7D shutter count
« on: December 12, 2013, 12:40:21 PM »
I tried a few resources yesterday and I couldn't find a program or website that would give me the sitter count on a 7d.  I have used astro jargon before, but alas, not compatible with the 7d.

Anyone want to point me in the right direction?
I have Macs at home, and this one worked fine for my 7D:

Canon Shutter Actuation App for Mac

Plenty of others out there if you Google for "Canon EOS Shutter Count".

Thanks.  I'll give it a look when I get home.  I only have Windows, but hopefully I'll find something


It takes a bit of work but, for Windows, try this: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1058019

11
Canon General / Re: Lose or Loose?
« on: October 29, 2013, 10:20:39 PM »
I suppose my thing is pronouns; They're such simple things that I can't understand why people get them wrong - that drives me crazy!

Jim

Using uppercase after a semi-colon may also drive some people crazy.

12
Canon General / Re: Priest meltdown over photographer at wedding. Ouch!! :O
« on: September 30, 2013, 02:01:19 PM »

I read one quote someone made on YouTube that I agreed with.  The groom should have leaned into the priests ear and said something like "I'm paying the photographers much like I'm paying you, please continue. And..if you do walk out, I'll sue your ass off, now, please get back to marrying us..."

cayenne

I totally disagree with this.  So, the groom would add his meltdown to the officiant's over-reaction?  You have not seen anything yet until the bride breaks down when the officiant walks away.

13
Lenses / Re: UCSD Science FAIL
« on: September 26, 2013, 06:14:30 PM »
You, I read the USC article.  The Toms Hardware writer made subtle modifications and left out relevant facts to make it fit his views.
 
The image had nothing to do with any cell phone.
 
USC Science did not fail, and if the OP had read the USC article first, he should have spotted the alteration of the USC paper.  Its not fair to blame USC for a article written by someone else that is misquoted and omits crucial information.  The blame falls on Toms Hardware and their employment of a incompetent writer who set out to prove a point.
I'd like to point out that UCSD is the public University of California-San Diego while USC is the private University of Southern California located in Los Angeles.

14
Technical Support / Re: How Exposure Compensation work with auto ISO?
« on: September 15, 2013, 06:37:11 PM »
Wouldn't the "feature" that the OP is asking for defeat the purpose of Manual mode?  Why not set the ISO himself, bumping it up or down to obtain the level of exposure according to taste.
He is probably shooting in changing light conditions (bird flying). Probably more or less against the light so he wants M with Auto ISO and EC to be applied on top of that. Cant be done on a 5D3. You can do exposure bracketing but no EC :(

Thanks for a very good explanation and example.

15
Technical Support / Re: How Exposure Compensation work with auto ISO?
« on: September 15, 2013, 01:22:45 PM »
Wouldn't the "feature" that the OP is asking for defeat the purpose of Manual mode?  Why not set the ISO himself, bumping it up or down to obtain the level of exposure according to taste.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5