March 06, 2015, 01:01:04 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - hawaiisunsetphoto

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
Sell it and use that money toward 70-200 f2.8 IS II or 135L ;)

I have x2 5D III. Guess what lenses I have on both bodies most of time? 24-70 II + 70-200

Enjoy your new 24-70 II !!!   +1 on the recommendation, above.   Given your shooting needs, I'd rec'd selling the 24-105 and picking up the 135mm f/2L, which is a nice, fast lens that renders beautiful bokeh.

Lenses / Re: EF 70-200 f/2.8L II Horror Stories
« on: October 01, 2013, 05:45:09 AM »
I have owned three copies, because I couldn't decide between the 85 L and the 70-200.

I have had one copy that was completely useless, I had it in for repair, they changed TWO AF-moduls and TWO IS-units, they took out the front end, and three glass-elements and re-aligned the glass and when it came back the AF worked perfectly, but the IS was still not starting as quick as the previous copy, and it jumped, and often worked only one direction, and made a very weird, loud noise. It was VERY soft at 200 when I sent it in, and after all the re-alignment of the glass and front end it came back exactly the same. I sold it for cheap and had the buyer try it to see if if he liked it, and he bought, so I got a third copy, which like the two others had the issue of IS not being perfect, sometimes too slow to start, sometimes only one direction stabilized. But the AF and sharpness and overall image quality and build is as good as it gets. Wonderful lens. Just not as good as the 200 L, which is the reason I no longer have it

I had a ef 200mm f2.8 II L and it was a stunning optic, slightly sharper than my 135L. When I got my 70-200 f2.8 L IS II, I compared it to my 200L and found that the zoom had better contrast and colours. Sharpness tthere was littel between them, manybe a slight nod to the prime wide open. But with teleconverters, the zoom was a lot better. The Zoom has the latest IS unit, faster and quieter AF and it focusses closer too. The bokeh of the prime and general flare control was better than the zoom. The prime is a lot lighter and less obtrusive.
I felt that for my needs, the zoom was a better optic.

I think he means the 200mm f/2.0L IS, not the 200 f/2.8L....

Lighting / Re: Finally getting some Eneloops, but will my old charger work?
« on: September 14, 2013, 06:02:24 PM »

If you have rechargeable batteries, this charger is a no brainer.

If you have eneloops, how is this ~$60 charger better than the ~$6 charger from Sanyo?

depends on your usage i guess if you would see a difference in performance over time.

i have sets of powerex batteries that i killed over time due to the amount of usage they got. even rechargeables dont last forever. the maha charger i have has multiple charge modes that allow for quick charge, slow charge (better for long term health of the batteries), and a refresh charge that can actually improve the performance of older sluggish batteries. a standard charger may not offer these extra features.

the 60.00 higher end chargers can increase the life and performance of your batteries. they can prevent you from having to spend on additional batteries over time at a clip of 30-40.00 per set. my charger has saved me a ton of money.

but depends on your usage. i use my batteries heavily and have seen the difference of charging modes 1st hand.

^  Agree.

Lenses / Re: 200 f2.0 first dissapointed customer ever?
« on: September 02, 2013, 06:56:50 PM »
If you're using the 5D Mark III, there's a known compatibility issue with this lens and a service bulletin from Canon.  I sent my 200 f/2L into Canon for the update.....

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5D3 or 1Dx
« on: September 01, 2013, 07:07:49 AM »
I have both.  I reach for the 1Dx first.

Lenses / Re: Help with a potriat lens
« on: August 07, 2013, 09:53:27 PM »
If you also want to shoot macro, the 100L makes sense. For around the cost of the 70-200/4L IS, you could get the 85mm f/1.8 and the 135mm f/2L.  That's like a portrait 1-2 punch.  An f/4 lens on FF is ok if you've got plenty of physical separation between subject and background, or in a studio with strobes and a backdrop (where I use f/9 or so).  But for 'candid' portraits, a faster aperture is preferable.

This would be a great solution.  The 135mm is an epic portrait lens for the price.  Or, a version I 70-200mm f/2.8L IS might also work for you, if you can find a deal on a nice used one.

Lenses / Re: EF 200mm f2 , how much do you use it and for what?
« on: August 07, 2013, 09:49:42 PM »
The EF 200mm f/2.0L IS USM is my favorite lens, which I use for wedding and portrait work.  It creates a distinctive look unmatched by any other lens.

Software & Accessories / Re: Portability: laptops vs desktops
« on: July 31, 2013, 01:53:46 AM »
In addition to Dell and Lenova workstations, you might also want to check out HP.  I bought an HP 17" Elitebook back in '09 with a "dreamcolor" screen that's pretty functional to this day....

Technical Support / Re: Not Windows
« on: July 30, 2013, 04:31:56 AM »
My Windows 6-core box crushes Macs costing 2-3X more....  building a dual Xeon workstation that's even faster - found a killer deal on ebay.  Both with Windows 8, which is great.  Using LR and PS6/CC....

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5D3 vs. 1DX for lower-light shoot
« on: July 25, 2013, 12:47:20 AM »
I have both.  If I had to choose one, I'd go with the 1Dx.  The battery will last, too.

Lenses / Re: Sell non L primes to get 24-70LII
« on: June 16, 2013, 03:50:41 AM »
The 24-70 II is amazing, and it rivals primes....  I'd recommend buying it and keeping your 85mm 1.8.  You'll have a low light lens, an excellent portrait lens, covering a bit of range along with the zoom.

Lenses / Re: What is the next Canon lens you want or covet and why...
« on: June 11, 2013, 02:53:57 AM »
I'd like to pick up the 400mm f/2.8L IS II at some point.  Used it once on loan... epic lens.  Also, a 17mm TSE....

Lenses / Re: need help consolidating my lens collection
« on: April 23, 2013, 07:36:27 PM »
Odds are that you're taking the 5D Mark III with you for travel.  I'd jetison the 10-22 and pick up the 24-70mm f/2.8L II, which is incredibly sharp.  I'd also recommend either the 14mm f/2.8L II or the 17mm f/4L TS-E for wide angle coverage -- for landscapes and/or architecture shots.  Or, instead the 17-40mm f/4L, which is light.....  You could also jetison the 35mm f/1.4L if you need to do so as that range is covered by the new zoom.

Lenses / Re: 50mm 1.2L vs 35mm 1.4L for events photography...
« on: April 23, 2013, 07:22:58 PM »
You might also want to check out the new Sigma 35mm f/1.4 "Art" lens....  rivals the 35mm f/1.4L....

Lenses / Re: A 4000$ budget for Lenses on 5D3... need suggestions
« on: April 16, 2013, 04:35:19 AM »
Given your budget, I'd recommend:

1) 24-70mm f/2.8L II -- tack sharp, rivals primes, also good in low light with high iso 5D Mark III
2) 135mm f/2.0L -- great bokeh, fast, light
3) 85mm f/1.8 -- cheap, light, fast, unobtrusive, decent lens
3) good tripod and ballhead

Hello CR folks,

I recently bought a 5D3 and 50mm 1.8.This is my first investment and I am based out of India. 
I mostly shoot Low Light , Landscape , Street Photography and Slow Shutter captures.

Before taking up 5D3 I had an experience of working with my colleague's Canon60D , 18-135(kits lens) ,70-200mm f4 and NikonD7000 50mm f1.4,70-200mm f4. 
I had some severe limitations while shooting Landscapes and didn't get enough experience on wide-angle shots  :-[
I will be travelling to Ladakh,a landscape,rich cultured,wildlife Himalayan Range in the month of July and I am looking for suggestions to get some 'real' gear.
All I can  say that this will be my starting point to get into some real action  ;)

I can spend up to 4000$ on the Lenses.
Please share the gear details based on your own experience.


Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5