February 27, 2015, 07:00:48 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Jon Gilchrist

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Landscape / Re: Railway odds and ends...
« on: January 08, 2015, 04:46:44 PM »
It was a cold day.

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Any old K-mount lenses worth getting?
« on: July 21, 2014, 11:44:17 AM »
Olympus made a 35mm f2.8 (or maybe it's f3.5) shift lens. No tilt, just shift. I use it on my Canon dslrs reasonably often with an adapter. It's currently on the counter ready to go in my bag for an architectural shoot this afternoon.

Pricewatch Deals / Re: Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6L USM For Sale
« on: July 01, 2014, 04:32:02 PM »
When you look at the "item specifics" tab it says that it's a 600mm f4. Hmmm.

100G? That's cute. How much to manage my 14T collection that's growing at a rate of 2-4T per year?

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Samyang 650-1300mm
« on: April 14, 2014, 03:49:34 PM »
I've got the 650-1300 and the 2x converter that goes with it.  All in all, it's mostly a novelty. I picked it up used for somewhere under US$175 and for that price it can be fun to play with and the size certainly attracts attention. But if you want quality photos, this isn't going to give them to you. It needs an extremely stable tripod. Like, made of 12 tons of granite. It is highly susceptible to temperature based focus shifts. Everything makes the image jiggle. If you use it to shoot the moon, you will have to focus constantly because it will focus past the moon and apparently the DOF at moon distance is less than the diameter of the moon.  But it is pretty amazing to be able to take recognizable pictures of things that you can barely see with the naked eye.

Here's the Golden Dome at Notre Dame University from 4 miles away (along with a bunch of sensor dirt) at 2600mm on a 60D:

Same shot, but with a 70mm:

And here's the moon at 2600mm:

I think if it were possible to stop it down a couple stops it might have acceptable sharpness.  But you can't, and it doesn't.

How many of the 250 million have you owned? I'm at 5, which is something like .0000002% (decimal may be off).

Landscape / Re: Shooting comet Ison and picking a body
« on: November 20, 2013, 11:22:50 AM »
Went out this morning with both bodies, but couldn't see the comet.   :(

Might try again tomorrow.

Landscape / Shooting comet Ison and picking a body
« on: November 18, 2013, 08:18:47 PM »
I plan on heading out one of these early mornings to shoot comet Ison. And I'm looking for some opinions or experience. I've got a 6D and a 60D. The 6 has way better high ISO, but the 60 has a finer pixel pitch. Which do you suppose would be better for shooting the comet?

EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: A Pellicle Mirror by Canon
« on: October 31, 2013, 10:23:35 AM »
One big advantage of a fixed mirror system is that you can get a much higher frame rate while being able to see the subject during exposure. So maybe 20+ fps with no mirror blackouts, less vibration, and improved durability. If I were a sports shooter, this would be huge.

Canon General / Re: Help design a time lapse rig
« on: August 28, 2013, 01:45:42 AM »
You could do most of this with LEGO Mindstorms.

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon is going to add mid format
« on: August 13, 2013, 03:14:05 PM »
Perhaps they will purchase the Pentax MF products. That would give them an established product to start with, along with non-European manufacturing. And considering that the Pentax is discontinued, they could probably pick it up for a song.

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: First pic of Sigma 24-70 F/2 posted
« on: August 01, 2013, 11:43:52 AM »

There's no *might* about that.

This thing will be a pickle jar.  I currently have a bet going with a friend.  He seems to think this beast will be under two pounds.   That money is as good as mine.

- A

Considering the 35/1.4 weighs nearly a pound and a half, I think you're pretty safe.

Canon General / Re: Canon Camera Sales Down in Q2, Imaging Revenue Up
« on: July 27, 2013, 11:21:59 AM »
Maybe if they had something I wanted to buy. There hasn't been anything new and available in the higher end crop body market in 3 years. I have two 60Ds that need replacing, but there's nothing to replace them with.

So does this mean I should sell my Sigma 35/1.4 and get the 18-35 1.8?

Lenses / Re: What's your oldest Canon EF lens?
« on: July 22, 2013, 07:38:06 PM »
I have a 50/1.8 Mk 1 with a date code UB0200, so that's February of 1987. Pristine condition.

It's for sale if anyone is interested.

+1 Mine is also UB0200. It looks even more pristine, if that's possible, than yours.

Looking at the picture perhaps "pristine" isn't the right word for my lens.  Considering the thing is 26 years old and was not stored as a museum piece, it's in pretty amazing condition. There are a couple minor scuff marks and there is evidence on the contacts that it has actually been mounted on a camera.  It's still in better shape than my 2-year old 24-105.  I doubt there are many Mk2 plastic fantastic versions still surviving after 20+ years.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4