October 25, 2014, 10:16:34 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bdunbar79

Pages: 1 ... 102 103 [104] 105 106 ... 174
1546
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 1DX vs. EOS 5D MARK III for Weddings,
« on: August 22, 2012, 11:22:46 PM »
For your uses, it doesn't really matter.  If you're a good photographer, the images will look identical.  Probably no need to pay for the extra AF features of the 1DX.  However, it also depends on how you shoot your weddings.  If you do it from a more photojournalistic style, I knew guys who did them with 1D Mark IV's with great success.  So in that case the 1DX would probably make it easier on you.

Either camera will do just fine though.

1547
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Specs? [CR1]
« on: August 22, 2012, 11:09:40 PM »
We have a 5D II and a 7D, and although the 7D doesn't have the resolution or low light capability of the 5D II, its in camera speed is unmatched.  The 5D II feels so sluggish after using the 7D.  I am excited about a 7D II that would have 24mp sensor and still great speed.  Even if it is far above the current 7D price point.  It would never replace the 5 series to us, but the pair make for fantastic shoots.  If the 7D II is for real, we will be looking to but both the new 7 and the 5D III this spring.

Realistically I'd think a 7D Mark II (not likely) or a 70D (more likely) would go behind the 5D Mark III, much like the 7D went behind the 5D Mark II in 2009, in level and price.  A higher MP camera will go between the 1DX and 5D Mark III.  I don't see APS-H on the horizon.

1548
If you can still buy them new now, and you really want one, now is the time to buy.  I wouldn't want to be buying used in 2 years.  Get one new now for a really low price.

1549
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 3D X [CR1]
« on: August 22, 2012, 10:53:34 PM »
I agree, the 5D Mark III could have had better DR.  That's the shortcoming I see and can understand.  Historically though, the 1Ds line has had that, and we sort of lost that with the 1DX and again I'll say, the 1DX doesn't replace the 1Ds3 at all.

1550
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 3D X [CR1]
« on: August 22, 2012, 10:49:33 PM »
However this camera turns out, 5D3 owners will be burned.

Not if it has the same old DR (i.e. not close to low ISO Nikon or MF), much slower fps, no chance for magic lantern, costs a lot more. You'd get better reach and detail but give up a lot since Canon won't give it cropped modes with speed or stay at a more reasonable 36MP to keep some speed and doesn't seem to have the sensor tech to deliver top quality low ISO pixels. I'd rather keep the 5D3 and wait for a 5D4 or D900 myself.
Of course, who knows, maybe they finally spring their miracle new sensor with this or it does have fast crops modes or better fps (46MP dual digic should go 4.7fps not 3.7fps and it could hit 6fps if they cut MP down a little).


EDIT: OK i misread the rumor, it mentions industry leading LOW ISO so forget what I wrote above. If it has industry leading low ISO DR and 46MP it will be a landscape and studio beast!  ;D

Yes, 5D3 owners will be burned. :-X

Burned?  Why?  Just b/c a better camera comes out doesn't make the one I have worse does it?  I'm a 5D3 owner and I don't want a 46 MP camera.  I don't want a 36 MP camera.  I want a 22 MP camera with a great AF system.  There's a reason I kept my 5D Mark III and sold my 1Ds Mark III. 

1551
EOS Bodies / Re: Anyone else preorder the EOS M yet?
« on: August 22, 2012, 07:59:47 PM »
I was going to but I'm disciplining myself to keep a specialized kit for what I do

(In my head:  I promise I won't buy the EOS-M, I promise I won't buy the 24-70L II, I promise I won't buy the 24-70L II...........unless I save up for it, I promise I won't buy the EOS-M).

1552
EOS Bodies / Re: Shooting leveled landscape pictures
« on: August 22, 2012, 07:39:42 PM »
I too have only used the LCD one and not the viewfinder one. 

1553
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 1DX VS 5D MKIII Cameras
« on: August 22, 2012, 07:37:52 PM »
I've done enough tests now that I can say the 1DX's advantage is clearly the AF accuracy.  I did another baby photo shoot last Tuesday, and I took both and slapped on the 85 f/1.2L II.  I purposefully didn't use flash on a couple shots and took 10 shots of the baby's face, in low light, spot metering off the face.  It was dark enough auto ISO gave 6400 on the 5D3 and 5000 on the 1DX.  The 5D Mark III had 5/10 slightly out of focus.  So then I used the 1DX, did the same thing, and all 10 were in focus.  I was very happy with the test results.  Not with the 1DX per se, but the results showed a pretty clear factor regarding AF.  The 1DX seems to AF easier in lower light than the 5D Mark III, in this test.  The 5/10 shots from the 5D3 were not keepers, and all of the 1DX shots were clear winners.  IQ was no different.

Let me convert a few to jpeg and I'll demonstrate.  Be back tonight.

1554
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: What would you do?
« on: August 22, 2012, 04:40:45 PM »
Sorry I misunderstood.  My apologies.

1555
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 1DX VS 5D MKIII Cameras
« on: August 22, 2012, 04:39:54 PM »
Yes, you empty headed animal, food throp whopper!!

1556
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 1DX VS 5D MKIII Cameras
« on: August 22, 2012, 04:06:57 PM »
To me the big advantage of the 1DX is the weather sealing and the ability to program functions - just pushing one button and in a split second i can go from freezing a subject to panning ( i shoot mostly wildlife and motorsports) - must say the autofocus and action capabilities of the 5Dmk3 impressed me when i tested both shooting swallows in flight - a very small object with a lot of directional changes during flight with really tests the autofocus  (shot handheld with a a 300mm....)

Well what do you mean?  An African or European swallow?

1557
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: What would you do?
« on: August 22, 2012, 03:07:45 PM »
Update:  Adorama is going to send me an E+ conditon 1D Mark IV.  I'm really appreciative of this.  Adorama is a great company and they certainly proved it here regarding this issue.  I have done all of my business in the past with them, and now will continue to do so in the future.  Great job Jacob, Jack, and Helen, I really appreciate you guys.  This makes me very happy and you can expect me to buy much more equipment from you in the future.  Again thank you.  I highly recommend Adorma to anyone.

1558
Canon General / Re: Adorama issues anyone? Ever try to return a product?
« on: August 22, 2012, 03:07:30 PM »
Update:  Adorama is going to send me an E+ conditon 1D Mark IV.  I'm really appreciative of this.  Adorama is a great company and they certainly proved it here regarding this issue.  I have done all of my business in the past with them, and now will continue to do so in the future.  Great job Jacob, Jack, and Helen, I really appreciate you guys.  This makes me very happy and you can expect me to buy much more equipment from you in the future.  Again thank you.  I highly recommend Adorma to anyone. 

1559
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: What would you do?
« on: August 22, 2012, 01:45:17 PM »
No worries to the board regarding Adorama.  If this type of thing happens, they said it will be corrected regardless if the original camera can be found or not.  They also mentioned it would be overnighted.  I can't see a problem here, thanks.

That makes sence to me.

Someone made a mistake, so? When I stop making mistakes I'm going to start expecting everyone else to be perfect. Untill then I will be having a beer with the other chilled folks.

I doubt anyone was expecting anyone to be prefect.  It's just a little nerve-racking when it's a $4500 camera that you need.  I sort of get what you're saying.  I'm sure if someone lost your 1DX you'd be having a beer with them all chilled out right?

As I said, it's taken care of, so there's not really any more need for posts are there? 

1560
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III Firmware?
« on: August 22, 2012, 12:31:47 PM »
I really hope they are working on the AF lighting fix.  I used my 5Diii for the first time last weekend at a wedding and the non-lit point drove me nuts in the dark reception hall.  It was especially bad trying to use AI focus with people dancing. 

If they have a problem with the exposure meter getting tricked by the lighted points, I would be perfectly happy with them only lighting up in manual mode!!!

Yeah, I'd like them lit too.  If they do affect metering, if you are in manual mode, don't set ISO to auto :)

Pages: 1 ... 102 103 [104] 105 106 ... 174