April 16, 2014, 05:05:06 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sith Zombie

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 9
61
Lenses / Re: 17-40mm advice please!
« on: March 02, 2013, 09:27:30 AM »
Wow yeah, great pics. I think I'll go for the 17-40 for now but that Tamron is looking awesome too  :D

62
Lenses / Re: 17-40mm advice please!
« on: March 01, 2013, 09:30:35 AM »
@Ambientlight, I'v got a 50mm too. With regard to the 24-105, yes I really like the idea of this lens as it would cover most of what I do [24mm to 35mm, and occasionally dipping into short telephoto] but that's on FF, on a crop I don't think the range is that good for me. Random orbits mentioned about getting it with the ff body, which I think is a good idea.
@everyone else, thanks for your input its appreciated :] I'v been thinking 'what lens will be best now and future proofed for FF' but now Im thinking maybe just get the best lens now for crop and worry about FF when I actually get it. Thanks

63
Lenses / Re: 17-40mm advice please!
« on: March 01, 2013, 07:00:34 AM »
Thanks, yeah the tamron is good, AF a little slow but not a problem for me really. I was also considering the 24-105 because it'll cover 90% of what I like to shoot but it's not a great lens for crop and I'm unsure when I'll move to FF, possibly a 5dmkiii at the end of the year but could be later.

64
Lenses / 17-40mm advice please!
« on: March 01, 2013, 06:20:32 AM »
Hi All
My Efs 17-85 broke awhile ago so I have been looking into getting a new lens.
I'm almost settled on going with the 17-40mm because:

I have a £600 budget [no 16-35mm]
Am a crop user that will upgrade to FF soon.
I mainly shoot with in 24-35mm range but would sometimes like wider, say 20mm
I'm mainly do landscapes in the day [but don't usually use a tripod]

Before I buy, I would like to ask is there another lens option somebody knows about/ can recommend? I'v been using a tamron 17-50mm for a few weeks that I like but I don't think it will work on FF. I'm also thinking they could possibly update the 17-40mm soon [it's like what? 10 years old?] to include IS and better optics but still f4 as so not to compete with the 16-35mm, anyone else think this is a possibility?

Thank you in advance!

65
EOS-M / Re: The Next EOS M? [CR1]
« on: February 24, 2013, 01:57:04 PM »
Quote
An entry level EOS M system camera could be coming in early 2014 and sit in the sub $500 category.

The present EOS M is sub-entry level. What could Canon remove to make the camera more basic ???

Lol  :) cardboard box with a sensor?

66
Lenses / Re: first trip to England any recommendations ?
« on: February 24, 2013, 06:57:54 AM »
If you want castles, then you want to go to wales. The best ones are: Beaumaris, Conway, Caernarfon, Denbigh. These are all fairly big castles. There are a few good ones in England like Beeston but I'v visited the welsh ones more. The attached images are of Conway, the castle is big and well preserved and you can walk around the original town wall too.

67
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Nikon 7100 has been anounced
« on: February 24, 2013, 06:33:32 AM »
The D700 split into two different cameras: the D800 and D600.

Yeah i guess, but I'm betting most d700 shooters would have preferred a d700s: 7fps, 24mp, solid build.
What they got was either: pretty much the same camera [d600] with lesser build quality but good amount of mp.
Or a complete beast [d800] whilst great for certain users, it's a step backward in fps and too large file size for others.

For sports, event, wedding or wildlife photographers already using a d700, I wouldn't consider either of these a great upgrade. Maybe the d600 for a 'slightly' faster shooting speed and more mp but then you lose the tank like build that the d700 was known for.

I think all three of those cameras are likely able to withstand rougher treatment than most people will deliver. Then again, I've seen some treat the D700 like it was made of porcelain with it wrapped up in a plastic bag whilst they were outside shooting. Go figure. Search on youtube for the comparison between Nikon and Canon where someone tries to burn them with a blowtorch.

I'll take a look. I'v seen the digital rev one one of the 7d were he freezes it in water then breaks it out with an air rifle and the thing keeps shooting!

68
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D3 candle light High ISO (102400)
« on: February 24, 2013, 06:25:56 AM »
Yeah, I get what you mean. I remember iso 400 film had a lot of grain, now we can shoot up to 1600 on most cameras, with decent results  :D

69
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Nikon 7100 has been anounced
« on: February 23, 2013, 05:50:05 AM »


The D700 split into two different cameras: the D800 and D600.

Yeah i guess, but I'm betting most d700 shooters would have preferred a d700s: 7fps, 24mp, solid build.
What they got was either: pretty much the same camera [d600] with lesser build quality but good amount of mp.
Or a complete beast [d800] whilst great for certain users, it's a step backward in fps and too large file size for others.

For sports, event, wedding or wildlife photographers already using a d700, I wouldn't consider either of these a great upgrade. Maybe the d600 for a 'slightly' faster shooting speed and more mp but then you lose the tank like build that the d700 was known for.

And yes, i agree the d7100 isn't a replacement for the d300s but its hard not to see that whilst nikons recent release's are great cameras, they don't seem to offer much to the existing semipro d700 d300s crowd. They seem more aimed at increasing the user base.

70
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Nikon 7100 has been anounced
« on: February 22, 2013, 05:11:23 AM »
I actually think Nikon made a mistake with this one, don't get me wrong the specs are really great and the price.... WOW! The camera is awesome but crop shooters at camp nikon are waiting for the d300s replacement. The d300s is similar to the 7D in specs [lower mp but more af points, 7fps, metal body]

Now imagine the 7Dmkii specs were the same as the nikon d7100? how pissed would you all be? losing fps, build quality. It's kinda like all the d700 owners when the d800 came out, way too many mps and a big fps drop.
From our point of view, these cameras are great but to some nikon users expecting incremental upgrades, they are a step backwards in some ways [build and fps]
They seemed to more geared towards getting new customers than the existing users, which is probably their strategy. [and it could be working on me, may end up with a d800]

I think the 7Dmkii has a chance to shine: full metal build, 5dmkiii af, 10 fps, 20-24 mp.
Only problem will be the price. Ouch!

71
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Spec List [CR2]
« on: February 20, 2013, 05:08:02 AM »
Canon! you jerks! when will this company get with it and release a camera people will buy??? For years I'v wanted a camera that prints photos on small slices of cheese, so I can view my photos and hand them out as tasty snacks. Nikon has cameras that print on a huge cheese range [CR] edam in the highlights and coloured cheddar in the shadows.
Canon, you are losing me as a customer....

72
Technical Support / Re: How do you store and archive your images?
« on: February 16, 2013, 05:43:12 AM »
Fairly straightforward, everything goes into aperture on my computer HD and then I do regular backups of my whole HD [via time machine] on to a 1TB external. I keep thinking of backing up to a 3rd device but to have 2 HD failures would be very rare. Also if they do fail, its usually a mechanical part that goes, so the actual data is still safe.

73
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: Big Sur and San Fran 5D3 Long Exposure
« on: February 16, 2013, 05:35:46 AM »

It should be evident, that my edit is the superior picture.  If nothing else, you can tell by comparing your sky, with mine, that your white balance is way off.  Now, again…sure it’s a matter of preference…but your color of the bridge, well it just looks like puke…and your sky is just not the correct color temperature. 


I feel you were a little harsh in your critique, but I do prefer the second edit. Great job with the exposure and composition op, the way the city lights aren't blown out is perfect. good stuff.

74
As the predawn shadows are lifted, I bet the rooster gets really noisy.

GROAN!!!!!
I liked that one! lol

75
Family Guy You Know What Really Grinds My Gears Small | Large


Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 9