1
Lenses / Re: What the 300mm f/2.8 II did for me
« on: May 17, 2013, 09:56:34 PM »
Thanks for the great review. Canon 300mm f/2.8 ll is my next plan.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
They are only good for photographing books at a distance. Otherwise get a Nikon.
I want to shoot wildlife and I have around $10000
well if you ask such questions and have so much money to spend.... at least get a good book about photography too....
a book that explains focal length and such basic stuff...
The 400 II is best...if you need a 400mm lens. If you need a 300mm lens, the 300 II is best. If you need a 50mm lens, they both suck.
neuro's in top form lately!
Q8-MC - Your question makes no sense. There is 100mm difference, and that grows when you start to use TCs. What do you want to shoot, why and what is your budget?
The 400 II is best...if you need a 400mm lens. If you need a 300mm lens, the 300 II is best. If you need a 50mm lens, they both suck.
Both are some of the best lenses one can get. Do you mean difference in IQ between them?