Messages

46

Lenses / Re: List of rumored lenses

« on: December 17, 2010, 11:36:08 AM »

I have a 50mm 1.8II and want to upgrade it... but the 1.4 seems to be so unreliable and crappy constructed that it wont even last....

Should I get it, keep the one I have and wait for a newer version, or get the sigma 1.4?

47

EOS Bodies / Re: DIGIC V [CR1]

« on: November 24, 2010, 04:08:01 PM »

why not a digic V and a digic Vx2 like a dual digic V but in one chip...??

48

Lenses / Re: 100-400 Replacement

« on: November 20, 2010, 10:19:17 AM »

I would have liked a 100-300 f/4 IS... seemed like the way to go, it still takes teleconverters... I had a Sigma version and liked it a lot, lacked IS, if not I would have kept it.

The 70-300 just seems pointless in the lineup, i think it needed to go to the 400mm range or have wider aperture... but most people will just buy a 70-200 2.8 for less money or a 70-300 of the IS USM ones non L.

49

EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark II Firmware 2.0.8

« on: October 19, 2010, 10:37:18 AM »

If I dont use any of those things, should I upgrade??

50

Lenses / Re: Lenses Lenses Lenses

« on: August 18, 2010, 02:19:36 PM »

I just bought a Sigma 100-300mm f/4... because the 70-200 was too short, and 100-400 with its push pull and the non constant aperture sold me. And the possibility of using a TC without loosing AF.

I would definetly change it for a canon version.

My 100-300 is not really that large in size and weight.