At first I thought "boring". Really, a 24-70L f4? But then I thought of it as broadening their range. There's not much in the middle. You got low and high. Okay, boring but practical at least.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I could never part with my trusted G11, so as long as it lives no replacement in that class for me.
So it won't work with existing CF cards, might as well throw all of my existing CF cards in the garbage if they change it.I'm selling my collection of thirteen CF cards of 2GB or larger. Sold three and and pre-sold five. The rest I need to look for as they are scattered in the house.
Original plan was to replace them with four 64GB or 128GB cards. I hate keeping track of so many loose items that I do not end up using. Why four CF cards? That makes it one body to one card.
Reading up on Sandisk, Lexar & Canon's involvement with CFast (and further readings on XQD) got me thinking that 2014 could be the year that we will see EOS bodies with SATA-based CFast card slots.
Too many eggs in a single basket? That has been the argument since over a decade ago. Never had a memory card go bad on me but misplacing them is always a problem.
It seems to me that putting big lenses on a compact body kinda negates the advantage of compactness. That leaves the great sensor as an advantage, but still, the practical advantages over say a 5D3 or D800 are not that great.I was thinking the same thing if I think of the camera as a compact. Big lens makes it impractical. But if you think of it as a DSLR competitor, then it becomes much more interesting. It's like a stripped down DSLR. For my fashion work, it would be an excellent camera to use in many levels.
Your mileage will certainly vary!