October 20, 2014, 08:27:53 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - brad-man

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 50
1
Technical Support / Re: Question about cleaning something off of sensor.
« on: October 19, 2014, 10:56:22 PM »
It sure sounds baked on, a deep wet-clean should do it.
Just had my sensor cleaned at Canon CPS. Here's behind-the-scenes footage of how they did it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrdkFXsr5Us

-pw

I'm not convinced that video is of an authentic Canon Service Center. I believe their cleaning bowls are red.

2
Lenses / Re: Building my lens system - where to go from my basic kit?
« on: October 14, 2014, 06:45:41 PM »
Although I have no idea what you shoot, and therefore have no understanding of what your needs are in this regard, I won't let that little detail stop me from recommending a couple of lenses I feel should be in everyone's kit: EF16-35 f/4L and the EF70-300 f4-5.6L 8)

3
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 6D Mark II to Move Upmarket? [CR1]
« on: October 14, 2014, 06:25:29 PM »
I may be late to this discussion, but I think what most users including myself have issues with the 6D is that as a consumer you feel Canon is NOT giving you "great value" for your money when they take the AF system back to one center cross-type, while Nikon doesn't seem to cripple their bodies in the same way.  It was biggest the complaint about the 5D Mark II, and Canon addressed it well with the Mark III, only to revert back to it with the 6D.  My memory is not that short term.
Also late to the topic but this echoes my thoughts too.
Canon not happy with 6D sales? More like their deliberate gimping of the 6D has come back to bite them (FWIW the 6Ds seem to still be quite highly recommended, including excuses of "no body needs more than 3fps :P).

So all I can really say is the same thing as before. If they made them all cross-type at say 5fps, it probably would've sold a lot more without costing 5D3 sales.

I think this is the problem. Canon made the same mistake with the 6D as they did with the EOS M, a seriously underwhelming focus system. The cameras work well for portrait, landscape and architecture. For any other use, the photographer does the work. I say this as someone who owns both and likes both, but would have greatly enjoyed a focus system commensurate with the quality of the photos the cameras are able to produce.

4
.... but the reality is that there is very little of the picture where this extended range would have made a difference and in the end, you probably could not notice the difference.

Here's an example of this from today, the sky was clipped, but after some brushing around in LR it doesn't matter since it was all grey anyway (well, bluish grey).  I call the shot "Thinking of DR discussions" :->

He may have been saying "goodbye Jon". It appears that jrista has left the building...


Nope, not gone. Just extracting myself entirely from the debate...all debates. I honestly don't know what I'm debating for, it's done nothing for me, the response from this community has clearly indicated they don't want me involved. So, I'm not. I've got better things to do. (BTW, the only way to stop getting notified in the new replies list of your activity in threads is to delete yourself entirely from those threads (in case anyone was curious)...therefor, this post will be deleted at the end of the day.)

I hope you reconsider removing yourself from all debates/discussions. You are one of the more knowledgeable and helpful participants on this forum and have much to offer. Just give the sensor argument a rest...at least until the 5DlV is released :)

5
.... but the reality is that there is very little of the picture where this extended range would have made a difference and in the end, you probably could not notice the difference.

Here's an example of this from today, the sky was clipped, but after some brushing around in LR it doesn't matter since it was all grey anyway (well, bluish grey).  I call the shot "Thinking of DR discussions" :->

He may have been saying "goodbye Jon". It appears that jrista has left the building...

6
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Deal: Canon EOS 5D Mark III w/24-105 f/4L IS $2899
« on: October 07, 2014, 07:58:34 PM »
That is a great price but looking at resellerratings.com I would think twice about that seller.

Do you believe everything you read online? Big Value has a 99.2% feedback rating after over 74,000 sales on ebay. You don't get marks like that by screwing your customers ::)

You have to understand that with ebay ratings you might as well start at 99% as being zero, and then rate the seller on that last percentage point. So, this reseller is actually about a 2/10 rating... for ebay (of course I overstate but not by much). I wouldn't touch anyone with less than 99.7% feedback rating. But go for it if you want. Perhaps you'll be one of the almost 6,000 pissed off buyers from a seller with such a rating, however perhaps you'll be lucky.

It is certainly your right to limit yourself from purchasing from a seller with less than 99.7% feedback. However, if you bothered to read some of that feedback, you would quickly see that a good percentage of the negatives are from folks who are intellectually challenged, scammers or simply had unrealistic expectations. By the way, you may want to revisit your math ;)

7
EOS-M / Re: Eos M and yn 603 triggers question
« on: October 07, 2014, 05:11:44 PM »
I've been meaning to "side-grade" from my 600d to an eos m for quite some time now and I just wanted to ask if my 603s(which have served me well in the rare occasions I do portrait work) will be compatible with an eos m.

Is there anybody here who can help me out with this?

A Canon hot shoe is a Canon hot shoe. They'll work fine, though I preferred the the flexibility of the 622s before I switched to the RT system.

8
Canon General / Re: seeimpossible.usa.canon.com?
« on: October 07, 2014, 05:03:23 PM »
Sony DOES have an excellent track record of bringing top-of-the-line technologies to market in a timely fashion, at a good price, without bugs or glitches, so at least you've got that going for you.  ::) They've become mainstream in every technology they ever were ahead at . . . they're the number one name in TVs, Portable Music Players, Laptops, and, oh yeah, cameras.
Sony also has a history of putting out a lot of proprietary crap in their products that they won't license in the vain hope that people will be trapped into buying Sony branded consumables forever and ever, which led to the doom of Betamax, the Super Audio CD and pretty much anything that needed a Memory Stick, among others.

OK pal. Now you've crossed the line. Say what you want about BetaMax, Memory Sticks and I'll even give you MiniDiscs, but don't you dare badmouth MY SACDs (at least not until those recordings are available on blu-ray pure audio) >:(

9
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Deal: Canon EOS 5D Mark III w/24-105 f/4L IS $2899
« on: October 06, 2014, 04:49:28 PM »
That is a great price but looking at resellerratings.com I would think twice about that seller.

Do you believe everything you read online? Big Value has a 99.2% feedback rating after over 74,000 sales on ebay. You don't get marks like that by screwing your customers ::)

10
EOS Bodies / Re: Upgrade Path Advice...
« on: October 06, 2014, 04:30:05 PM »
Definitely the 6D. If you will be satisfied with an incremental improvement in AF and IQ, the 70D for $800 http://www.adorama.com/ICA70DZ.html?emailprice=t&sub=bund-27906826&utm_term=Other&utm_medium=Affiliate&utm_campaign=Other&utm_source=rflaid62259 would probably be a more suitable choice than the 7Dll, since the IQ will be about the same and you don't appear to need the extras that the 7Dll offers. You already have excellent glass for full frame so if you're not "reach limited", I would go for the greatest improvement in the quality of your photos in various lighting conditions.

11
Canon General / Re: seeimpossible.usa.canon.com?
« on: October 05, 2014, 06:46:38 PM »
Probably a new designer camera bag.

Don't be disrespectful. It's a pair of Heather shoe(s) to go with the Linda bag...      too soon?...      is this thing on?

12
EOS-M / Re: EOS M Accessory question
« on: October 03, 2014, 12:03:11 AM »
This is a more expensive option, but I already had the RRS BEOSM plate.  They discontinued the L component before I could order it, but I recently found the BG1X-L L component for the BG1X plate would mate to the BEOSM plate and not interfere with the M ports or strap mount.  See photos below.

One unexpected benefit - the L bracket makes it easier to hold the camera in my left hand while operating controls and touch screen with my right.  I am right handed and use the touch screen a fair amount so I found the lack of grip on the left problematic.  A grip on the right really doesn't work as well for me with touch screen cameras.  Now if only I could find an ARCA comfort grip/strap that would slide on the L bracket I think this might be an ideal solution.

A very elegant solution! Hope it fits the M3 when it becomes available...

13
EOS Bodies / Re: Next Rebel Going EVF? [CR1]
« on: October 02, 2014, 05:29:09 PM »
Mirrorless & no moving parts would make it difficult to wear out.  Image quality goes up when mirror bounce is removed. +++  I use live view for critical work- big difference.  If it will take all my big glass, I'd be very tempted to give it a try.  Also, the lack of moving parts would open the door to a higher frame rate. +++++++
It would be nice to be able to shoot video without holding the damn thing 2 feet out in front of you- especially with a "big white" attached.  Should be interesting.

exactly. I am looking forweard to SSCs .. solid stae cameras. 100% mechanics-free. Fully electronic, Global Shutter. No noise. No slapping. No flapping. No cocking. No springing. No vibration. YES!

Last element to get rid of will be mechanical apertures - replace with electro-translucent LCD or similar. Always perfectly circular at any f-stop. Smaller unit. And no miore mechanical focus gears and focus rings. Everything by wire. Makes .. smaller lenses. And better wheathersealed ones, too. Pancakes galore. Plus tiny f/4 zooms all the way to 135 mm. All of them dirt cheap like EF-M lenses. And optically more than "good enough". For me. And most enthusiasts. All the others may just go and buy Leica and Zeiss Otusses.   8)

And they all lived happily ever after, never worrying about shutter count/failure. Now if they could only make the lenses just as rugged...

14
EOS-M / Re: EOS M Accessory question
« on: September 30, 2014, 06:10:03 PM »

Is anyone aware of an L bracket that's size-appropriate for this little fellow? Henjar Photo sells an L bracket for the Fuji 690 that is a little large but would work, but it's $105 ;D
I picked up this universal L-Bracket and although it is Arca-Swiss compatible it does not work with my RRS quick release clamp. If you use a screw type Arca clamp then you should be fine. It will rotate on the camera body over time as it is not machined specifically for the M however it is less than $10.

I only use arca screw clamps just to avoid such incompatibility issues between plate manufacturers. I would also appreciate the link.

15
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 70-200 f2.8L IS II pricing and feedback
« on: September 29, 2014, 05:29:01 PM »
PS: I picked up a Canon refurbished for $1699.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 50