April 16, 2014, 04:08:35 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - kennephoto

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 18
1
Video & Movie / Re: Just WOW
« on: January 27, 2014, 10:49:27 PM »
That was a pretty sweet video! Thanks for sharing, might not have seen it otherwise.

2
Lighting / Re: 50$ monolights
« on: January 08, 2014, 10:51:58 PM »
It's a cheap mono light. You get what you pay for I guess.

3
I have a 1d mark iii and wondered too but im using SanDisk extreme 16gb 45mbs and 60mbs cf cards and ive used a microcenter 16 anf 32gb class 10 sdhc and they all worked fine. Ive also read that the sd slot was faster than the cf.

4
Lenses / Re: Found Canon 28-80mm f2.8 and Canon 80-200mm f2.8, thoughts?
« on: December 27, 2013, 01:08:54 PM »
Oh I must have missed the part where you are using it for video. I think you'd be surprised by thr lens if you haven't used it before. It does perform very well. Id use it again but I don't often do video so my 135mm is more useful to me. Its worth checking out in person for sure.

5
Lenses / Re: Found Canon 28-80mm f2.8 and Canon 80-200mm f2.8, thoughts?
« on: December 27, 2013, 09:55:42 AM »
Cool. I may get the 80-200mm only.... Anyone tryied that lens?

Thanks very much for the help

I owned the 80-200 2.8 for years and I really liked it mine was very sharp even at 2.8 and I loved the bokeh. Mine was a little out of alignment I think as it required some micro focus adjusting which resulted in some missed shots also do to the focus being slightly slower than some USM lenses im used to. Its a heavy lens and you have to flip the switch to use manual focus. I really liked it but I sold mine and got a used 135mm f2.0 and wouldn't go back.

6
EOS-M / Re: External Microphone for EOS M
« on: December 10, 2013, 12:20:48 AM »
Thanks for the reply I will try that one out!

7
Lenses / Re: What chopped off my (Bokeh) balls?
« on: December 09, 2013, 04:48:24 PM »
Isn't it just the armrest of the couch in from of the lights blocking that part of the light from hitting the lens? And the rest are just reflections in the elements of lens or maybe a filter on the front of your lens creating the bike ball cutoff reflection on the other side of the photo.

8
EOS-M / External Microphone for EOS M
« on: December 02, 2013, 01:09:37 AM »
Good evening I'm starting to do a little more video work with my EOS M and I like using it for video but I find its not getting the audio I want. I'm looking to buy my first external mic but don't know where to start. I want to do some simple instructional videos like how to style so I'm thinking something like a lapel mic or a shotgun if those will work too. Can anyone point me to some good brands or something you already use that would save me time and money testing. Thank you!

9
Lenses / Re: Canon 10-22 vs. Tokina 11-16
« on: November 27, 2013, 10:48:35 AM »
I've used the tokina 12-24 f4 lens and I loved that lens. Maybe it's not fast enough for photojournalism but it was very sharp in the center and the build was very strong. It seemed pretty wide to me on my 40d back in the day.

10
Lenses / Re: Tamron 24-70 f/2.8
« on: November 27, 2013, 01:16:33 AM »
I agree with logaandm and took the liberty of adjusting your image doing essentially what he said.  I also warmed the image up because to me it felt right for this picture.


This is meant to be constructive criticism. Please don't take offence. I wouldn't even take the time to comment if I didn't see some interesting ideas in the photograph.

First ask yourself why you took the picture - what attracted you to the scene. Then ask yourself if you managed to show in the photograph that feeling or concept. What were the key things in what you saw which attracted you - the grapes, the frost, the light the shadows?

1. The horizon isn't level
2. The horizon is in the middle of the photograph and that is a no-no
3. The main subject (the grapes?) should (probably) be done with rule-of-thirds - probably off to the left.
4. The framing of the grapes with the blurred background should have used either the washed-out sky OR the darker earth. You have framed the grapes with both.
5. Post processing probably should have emphasised the grapes with the light shining through them. Either do this by shooting them entirely against the sky or entirely against the darker earth.

Good photographs show some sort of contrast - light/dark  blue/red, happy/sad, rich/poor. The brain enjoys broken patterns. When taking the photograph you should "frame" the composition. Take photographs from different angles with different f-stops to explore subject isolation and the contrast with the background.

I think I see what you were trying to do and there is some things like cropping and tone control you can do in post. The horizon through the middle of the picture, however, probably can't be saved.


Nice edit! I really like it.

11
Lenses / Re: EF 24-70 f/2.8L IS Exists as a Working Prototype [CR2]
« on: November 27, 2013, 01:14:25 AM »
I am not ready to spend around $3K in a normal lens, and many people out there won't. Canon needs to update those lenses that do not render good IQ and sharpness, rather than focusing on improving 'excellent' lenses.

Well, remember that 24-70 is a bread and butter lens, one of the most important in Canon's lineup.  It is to their benefit to ensure they have the best version available out there IMO.  Tamron is getting a lot of business with a nice quality 24-70 f/2.8 IS lens for half the price due to Canon's unwillingness to release an IS version.

Also, Canon does not HAVE to increase the price, they could actually *drop* the price of the non-IS version to ~1699 which would put it in a lot more reasonable space than it is now.  Then put the IS version where the old version was, at 2299.

I hate when people make this much sense! Sarcasm of course, because I totally think what you're saying is what canon should do! I've used the 24-70 II and loved it and would buy it if it came down in price a bit more especially with the way you say they should do it!

12
EOS Bodies / Re: This is the Way a White Camera Should be Done
« on: November 26, 2013, 04:07:24 PM »
Now for my regular exercise ( swimming against the tide )  ::)

Perhaps it is because I only recently escaped, but "white" makes me think of straitjackets, institutional corridors, orderlies and plain as can be appliances.

Cutesy colors make me think of the previously mentioned "Hello Kitty"/"Gangnam Style" consumer level.

IMO, black, with crisply engraved contrasting lettering/scales/etc., says "serious instrument".

Not least of my objections is the glaring-object-in-your-face I posted about before.

Damn this mud, …can't move my feet!

(P.S. - I'm not fond of pink pistol grips, either,.. WTF, grumble, mumble, …fade out with shaking jowls and frown.)  :P

Interesting take on colors! When I think about what you wrote I find that to be true in many applications! Thanks for making me think a bit today!

13
Lenses / Re: Ken Rockwell reviews canon 50mm f/1.0
« on: November 22, 2013, 03:06:51 PM »
Quote
Jessica Claire has a blog post with some good photos made with this lens:http://www.jessicaclaire.net/index.cfm/postID/263/Wedding-with-DJ-Brittany-Rod
[/font]



What BEAST of a camera is she using to get a shutter time of 1/12000 s ?!





My canon 1D classic does this!

14
Portrait / Re: Becoming a wedding photographer.
« on: November 22, 2013, 02:54:48 PM »
My wedding experience is limited but my wedding clients seem too enjoy the candid photo more than the posed group shots that more or less document who was there. They seem to share and talk about the photos that convey emotion and document the ceremony. I'm basing this what I see on Facebook when they share them and I bet when they make a photo album to look back on they will enjoy the same candid romantic photos more than the group shots. To sum up whole wedding or nothing, there's no point in just doing part of the day.

15
Software & Accessories / Re: Canon Shutter Actuation App for Mac
« on: November 18, 2013, 01:02:41 AM »
Is my shuttercount.com as accurate as this app? Or does this app do more than my shuttercount.com?

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 18