September 20, 2014, 06:36:53 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - steliosk

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8
31
Lenses / Re: Lots of New Lenses Coming in 2014 [CR2]
« on: November 10, 2013, 06:05:29 PM »
some new 1.4 glass primes PLEASE
screw the IS :D

32
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Mark II Spec List Surfaces [CR1]
« on: October 27, 2013, 08:39:09 PM »
20MP or 24MP sensor with Dual Pixel CMOS AF
- borrowed from 70D

Auto-Focus system similar to the EOS 5D Mark III (61 points), possibly the same as 5D3
- borrowed from 5D3

Single card slot
- LOL

WiFi & GPS
- borrowed from 6D

Innovative video features
- probably filters and effects borrowed from 700D

Price around $2000
- at least

Very good ISO performance
- compared to 7D but same with 70D


typical canon
nothing new
they didn't either bother to put a dual slot in the camera.


hope to prove i'm wrong.. i'd be glad if i'm wrong.

33
Third Party Lenses (Sigma, Tamron, etc.) / Re: Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC
« on: September 29, 2013, 05:10:14 PM »
i do love mine
razor sharp at 2.8 but with heavy vignette
perfect sharp from edge to edge at f/11 and f/16. After that diffraction gets in the way :(

here are some shots taken from Greece

http://500px.com/photo/46185986
http://500px.com/photo/41061036
http://500px.com/photo/40862852

The only thing i hate with 14mm lenses are the filters :(

the 16-35L is more handy and all around lens. I'd love to have one. (however i use the similar 10-22 with my crop camera) however 14mm is WIDER than 16mm.. and yes those 2mm can make a difference (major reason why i chose 10-22 over the tokina 11-16 which is only 1mm shorter but thats another story.)

34
Lenses / Re: the future of 1.2 L lenses ?
« on: September 20, 2013, 06:38:54 AM »
The only reason to buy 1.2 glass is the DOF!

the f/1.2 world is way too different than the f/2.8...

many thanks for your answers!

35
Lenses / Re: the future of 1.2 L lenses ?
« on: September 17, 2013, 03:03:30 PM »
At f/1.2 focus accuracy is only going to be so accurate ...

That´s the main point. If you are looking to get the f1.2 lenses, you should have the best available AF, to cope with the very shallow DOF. And if you can´t afford the 1DX, then 5DIII is next in line.

that is why i chose 5D3 over the 6D. Plus the ergonomics. ok the 6D is probably a stop better at high ISO, but i really needed the dual card and the AF system of 5D. I've searched it a lot, even here in canonforum before i make a decision on which camera should i buy.

Anyway, i tried the 85 1.8 at 1.8 and it focus accurately. So i'm thinking the f/1.2 would make a perfect combo with the AF of 5D3.

and as much as i read there will be no successors to these lenses any time soon, so i'm going for it.

36
Lenses / the future of 1.2 L lenses ?
« on: September 17, 2013, 11:59:57 AM »
hi all

I've purchased 5D3 over the 6D, and the main reason was the accurate AF with fast lenses.

I've worked several crop bodies in the past but the FF world plus the accurate AF system delivers something way beyond and solves many many problems such as DOF and focus accuracy.

With that said, i've tested yesterday an EF 85mm f/1.8 at 1.8 on 5D3 and on some EOS Rebel bodies, where this lens failed focusing accurately on the rebels, but focused perfectly with 5D3.

However i'm building a new system and i want to add some lenses but i'm concerned about the age and the quality.
I'm talking about the 50L and the 85L where the price is way up in comparison to 50 1.4 and the 85 1.8 which can be focused VERY properly with 5D3, but however the 3D look of those L are unbeatable. I suppose that justify the cost.

Those L lenses are build somewhere in 2005-2006 i think, is there any word out there about replacements?
There are many complains about the 50L softness at 1.2 and the slow USM moter of 85L

Don't get me wrong, i know the idea of "if you need something now, get it now" but i'm not kinda in the rush.
I shoot weddings and this season is over for me so i was thinking about next year.

I just hate to make a move and buy one of them now and a new model like 50L II comes out soon and fixing the softness and stuff. That'll make me feel like an idiot.. who wouldn't?

thanks for your time.

38
Lenses / Re: Is the Canon 24-70 F4 worth the price?
« on: August 16, 2013, 08:34:13 AM »
- Is the Canon 24-70 F4 worth the price?

NO


Get the 24-105
Cheaper, longer end, sharper after 50mm (and at 24mm f/5)

barrel distortion and vignetting is correctable in ACR/LR


Never understood why canon released the 24-70 f/4 IS

The IS should go to the 24-70 2.8 which is hell expensive, and also a second version of the beloved 24-105 would be a wise upgrade if existed.

39
Lenses / Re: Canon 40mm or High-End Compact?
« on: August 16, 2013, 08:16:00 AM »
I love mine

I was on the hunt for a great value for money 50mm lens but all those failed me.
The 50L is way too expensive and a bit outdated, plus its soft and focusing is a nightmare to get a nice shot at 1.2 or even 1.6!! so whats the point of using it? weather sealing? LOL
The 50 1.4 way too soft, works well after 2.8 so whats the point of using it?
The 50 1.8 same as 1.4
The Sigma is huge, frings all over, soft, didn't like it :(
The Zeiss 1.4 no AF :(

So whats left?

The 40 pancake is sharp all the way at 2.8, in FF and CROP bodies, with lovely bokeh and very reasonable price

also you get 35mm when you step back a little, and a 50mm when you step a bit forward :D

40
- swirl screen (its a low angle and a video tool gddamn it)

- higher dynamic range (thats critical)

- noiseless shadows when pushed up in post processing (way too critical, although ML does a GREAT job while canon genius firmware developers can't)

- faster AF in live view (its a shame for a $ 3000 equipment to have the same performance like 450D which was the first LV camera with AF (when shutter pressed) back in 2007)

- dual and FAST SD cards (get rid of this expensive stupid and outdated CF junk)

- wireless flash triggering would be nice (600D has one, and the pro series does not?)

41
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5d3 + flash 580 ex behavior
« on: June 20, 2013, 02:44:44 PM »
thanks Neuro,
the major problem is the iso lock to 400
i can't get rid of it in any mode either AV or M

and the worse thing, even when i don't use the flash in e-ttl

somehow the camera locks the iso 400 if a flash unit is connected over it.. doesn't matter the other settings..
if you want to take wide angle shots based in high iso the subject is lit in front from the flashgun and the background goes black with that stupid iso400.

A continuous led light insted of flash probably would save a lot of trouble but even then you'll have to play with the amount of light, (tune up for portraits and tele shooting, tune down when using wide angle)

pffff i got stressed :(

42
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5d3 + flash 580 ex behavior
« on: June 20, 2013, 02:24:09 PM »
the flash is 580 ex II if that helps

43
EOS Bodies - For Stills / 5d3 + flash 580 ex behavior
« on: June 20, 2013, 02:23:34 PM »
Hi all
 i just bought 5D mark 3, after playing with it a bit, i was satisfied enough BUT here is the snag i hit which is major.

Does anybody of you guys work with a speedlight flash? because the flash changes EVERYTHING.

lets be more specific.

AV program (without flash in the camera)
f/2.8
auto iso 100-25600
min shutter = 1/250

when i put the flash
everything is pretty much screwed!

iso locks to 400 for some reason
the shutter speed disobey the minimum shutter speed (although i can control it through flash control up to 1/60 or 1/200).

i want
auto iso 100-25600
min speed = 1/250
and flash to ttl in order to lit a bit my subjects in front..

any idaes? don't tell me i have to play manually, that scenario is out of the question.. I do weddings.. i can't play with settings during the cemerony, i need something more solid and automated.

44
i have the B+W 3.0 ND 110 Filter

magenta cast all over

it does a good job if you're playing b/w
but in colour you'll have to reduce the magenta tint in the white balance.. Still the colours would look like painting.
here are some pictures taken with the b+w 110

http://500px.com/photo/33999937
http://500px.com/photo/29847449
http://500px.com/photo/27206753
http://500px.com/photo/24398929
http://500px.com/photo/8230871
http://500px.com/photo/22969153
http://500px.com/photo/16990353

Haven't tested the mrc though.

45
EOS-M / Re: EF-M 11-22 / 4-5.6 IS STM - officially announced
« on: June 07, 2013, 07:02:10 AM »
its obvious canon doesn't want to hit the market of mirrorless making making a very late entry and making such toys.

Sony NEX 10-18 F4 225 gram
Canon 11-22mm F4-5.6 220 gram


alright the canon might be cheaper, but the sony is better and you pay what you get.!

Sony nex is the king of mirroless, PLUS sony nex can take EF lenses with a converter and support AF!!

So i wouldn't bother with any canon eos-m stuff.

The ef-m 22mm 2.0 is interesting though, i wish there would be an EF version as well! Pancakes are useful. Toys are not.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8