24-105 + 100macro (L or not) + 70-200 IS (f2.8 II best or f4 excellent)
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
yes, for 40mm pancake
Have there been firmware updates for Canon lenses that are loaded through the camera?
SO, hey hey gearheads, I can't think of a better place to ask this question. As most of you know, I shoot mostly weddings and portraits. One of the little things I'd like to improve on are ring shots. It's not that I don't like the shots that I am getting, but, I'd love to get in a little closer and the only lens I have that allows for really close focusing is the 16-35, which while it can get close, even at 35mm it's not as tight and DOF with that is not to my liking. I enjoy using the 50, 85 and 70-200 for that, but with the minimum focusing distance it requires a big crop to get the desired shot.
SO that leads to options. And I am not sure which way to go, and given the very limited use I'm seeking to fill, not sure I want to spend a ton of $$$.
or, I could go with an extension tube ---what are your thoughts on extension tubes? They are a fairly cheap fix which would get me in a bit closer, and I'd be able to use those on all my longer lenses.
Another option is the http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/87494-REG/Canon_2822A001_58mm_500D_Close_up_Lens.html
That one in particular is would fit my 85 1.8 --- its the cheapest option by far, but, again I have to wonder if that's enough. Do I need the versatility of the extension tube? Or, should I bag all of those ideas and snag one of the above mentioned lenses (I see the 180 macro used all the time on B&H...and I have heard that the 100L is also good for portraits...but, with a 85 1.8 and the 70-200, would I really use a 100 macro for portraits?)
Again, it's not like I plan on diving into the insect world (yeah, of course once I can I probably will, but thats not the main idea here). Pretty much just wanting a way to get tighter shots of wedding rings, and looking to do so without spending an arm and a leg (I'd much rather snag a 135L than a macro lens..)
On the other end of things...I am considering a 2x teleconverter too. I have heard much more about those though...
I believe it's a nice lens as well, for the price, however, I think it's a bit lacking in contrast on my 5d m3.agreed, usually set contrast +1 or +2 and color sat +1 in DPP.
I think this is a good response to the mirrorless competition. It's not much bigger than the EOS-M and it retains full functionality of a Rebel including phase-detection AF. Stick a EF 40mm pancake, and you have a small walk-around or street camera or use it as a backup to a larger camera. It won't take up much space in the camera bag.I have the same opinion
I think this is true evolution of the Rebel line, not the T5i. It retains the physical controls that we are used to and are more efficient than menus. Canon is probably using this to gage how well the public will accept the smaller form factor for future Rebels. Now the Rebel is positioned better to compete with future micro 4/3rds systems. Why design another line of lenses (EF, EF-S, EF-M)? Play to Canon's strength: its breadth and depth of EF lenses.
It is interesting -- thanks for posting. Add an EVF and some dials to the EOS-M and the length and width are similar. The depth is bit larger to accomodate the mirror box, but then you also get a useable grip and phase detect AF. Definitely wouldn't mind having one as a backup camera -- wouldn't take up much space in the camera bag.
will hold value over time better than the old one...+1
You have warranty on it+1
My weakest area is right in the middle of the blue-green transition area, which I believe is common for men. My visual acuity isn't what it used to be (need reading glasses) but I'm happy with the results of this test.The same ...
It's a lightweight sharp lens that works.. If you're into street photography, it's a nice lens for it (full-frame: 40mm, crop sensor: 64mm).From usa.canon:
I did notice that my lens tends to forget to focus (when on AF), and the remedy is usually to remount it again; I think something is wrong with the connectors. I checked with another friend that has it, and he's encountering it too.. Anybody else experiencing that?
something not right about those 24-70 sample images. no way there is that much distortion. the images have been squashed or something surely?Look at jpg, it's all right. Thumbnails are wrong scaled.