May 24, 2013, 04:50:39 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bvukich

Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 ... 40
526
Lenses / Re: Your lenses wishlist for 2011.
« on: February 06, 2011, 02:31:47 PM »
EF 50mm f/1.0L USM II

DO IT CANON!!
Worse image quality than the 50mm f/1.2 for a higher price... we've been there before...

Worse is very subjective.  If the soft, dreamy, look of the 50/1 is what you're looking for; then the 50/1.2 is the one that looks worse.

If you think you need the 50mm f/1L, chances are you're wrong, and would be better suited with the f/1.2.  If you know you need the 50/1L, there is no substitute.

527
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Mirrorless [CR1]
« on: February 04, 2011, 04:13:14 PM »
If Canon do produce a mirrorless camera, I wonder if it will take the existing EF lenses, that would make it attractive to exising users.

Native, it would be unlikely.  As it would result in a body that is easily twice as deep as it needs to be.

However an adapter, be it first party or third, would be logical.

528
Lenses / Re: Help with My Next Lens
« on: February 03, 2011, 08:59:38 PM »
Have you considered the EF-S 17-55/2.8 ?

529
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III & Other Random Stuff
« on: January 31, 2011, 11:43:01 AM »
Whatever Camera Canon release, it needs to be something that can compete with the Nikon D3s iso and autofocus ability, as Canon does not have a FF camera that offers what the D3s offers right now. :)

The D3s competitor is the 1D Mark IV.  Comparable high ISO, better auto focus, slightly faster, higher resolution, and significantly better video.


1D Mark IV isn't Full Frame the last time I checked, which for me is a total deal breaker.

Canon pro sports bodies are currently APS-H; if that's not what you are looking for, then you should probably buy a D3s.

530
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III & Other Random Stuff
« on: January 31, 2011, 08:42:32 AM »
Whatever Camera Canon release, it needs to be something that can compete with the Nikon D3s iso and autofocus ability, as Canon does not have a FF camera that offers what the D3s offers right now. :)

The D3s competitor is the 1D Mark IV.  Comparable high ISO, better auto focus, slightly faster, higher resolution, and significantly better video.

531
EOS Bodies / Re: “1Dsq” & 3D [CR1]
« on: January 29, 2011, 07:26:04 PM »
When will you guys get it? With the EF registry distance of 44mm you can't have a mirror that will give you a short side much over 24mm. It has nothing to do with lens baffles or image circles. It is impossible to make a reflex camera with a 44mm lens registry distance anything over a 26mm square, even a non moving pellicle mirror can't do it. The only way you can realise a longer short side, and see through the lens, is to read off the sensor.
From 24 X 36mm to 30X30mm, the "Shortside" onlyincreased by 6mm, ie. 3 mm on each end of the "short side". If you look inside the film slr or FF dslr. You can see that there are easily 3mm space between the edge of the view finder and the insde of the camera body. This space is "reserved for the morror movement. If we think outside of the box and put the mirror hinge at the bottom of the camera. It may be doable.

The mirror is on a 45 degree angle, so 6mm of sensor equates to 8.48mm of mirror ( 6*sqrt(2) ). There is only 44mm from the front face of the flange, to the film (sensor) plane.  Being able to flip up a 43.27mm mirror in that space will be tight, to say the least.  With careful body design, it may be possible.

To flip down, you would probably need even more room, because then you have to clear the shutter too.

532
EOS Bodies / Re: “1Dsq” & 3D [CR1]
« on: January 29, 2011, 04:24:00 AM »
When will you guys get it? With the EF registry distance of 44mm you can't have a mirror that will give you a short side much over 24mm. It has nothing to do with lens baffles or image circles. It is impossible to make a reflex camera with a 44mm lens registry distance anything over a 26mm square, even a non moving pellicle mirror can't do it. The only way you can realise a longer short side, and see through the lens, is to read off the sensor.

That part never even crossed my mind.

A mirror to cover a 30.6mm tall sensor would be an absolute minimum of 43.27mm tall.

533
EOS Bodies / Re: “1Dsq” & 3D [CR1]
« on: January 28, 2011, 07:34:40 PM »
I guess, if you cant beat 'em, join 'em...

Small | Large

534
EOS Bodies / Re: “1Dsq” & 3D [CR1]
« on: January 27, 2011, 01:00:12 PM »
Not to mention I wouldn't want to see the corners on a 36mmx36mm sensor with the lens that don't have the baffle on the back of them.

The image circle for a an EF lens would make a 30.6mm square sensor.  Sensor size would be constrained by the hypotenuse (43.266mm), not the width of a 3:2 ratio frame.  For the record, a 36x24mm sensor is 864 mm2, a 30.6mm square sensor is 936 mm2.  That is an 8% increase of surface area.  That, coupled with the fact that a square sensor would have less sensor area outside of the 'sweet spot' of the lens would likely result in slightly sharper images.

OK... now take your 30.6mm square sensor and crop it to a normal AR and you only have 30.6x20.4 and only 624mm^2.  Significantly smaller than FF, and just a smidge over APS-H.

535
EOS Bodies / Re: \
« on: January 26, 2011, 04:09:24 PM »
What about the lenses that have rectangular reflection masks?

The 24-105/4L is the most obvious example I can think of, as it is masked after the back element and clearly visible.

536
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III / 6D from India
« on: January 25, 2011, 09:54:36 PM »
Quote
The last thing I need is a touch screen.

I won't entirely dismiss a touch screen, but I do wonder how that would work. As it is, every time I look through the viewfinder I end up with smudges on the screen. I wonder how they'd prevent me from changing settings with my nose.  :)

Keep in mind too, that with phone touch screens, you have to have special gloves for the winter. Never say never, but I just have a hard time getting my head around the idea that this would be a good thing.

The proximity sensor will probably disable the touchscreen when it is up to your face.  Much like phones do.  The screen already turns off when triggered by the proximity sensor.

That being said.  I want a touchscreen about as much as I want a swivel screen, which is not at all.

537
Software & Accessories / Re: Thoughts on 430EX
« on: January 25, 2011, 04:58:41 PM »
These are what I use:

http://www.batteriesplus.com/product_search/36025-PowerEx-Rechargeable-NiMH-Battery-AA-4--Pack-2700-mAh-DASH--DASH-PowerEx-MHRAA4.aspx

Disclaimer:  I work in the B+ corporate office.  My posts here do not represent them.  Etc, etc, so on and so forth.

538
Software & Accessories / Re: Thoughts on 430EX
« on: January 25, 2011, 04:47:11 PM »
Since you already have a 580, and the added bonus of the 7d being able to trigger, I would absolutely go with the 430 (or two).  With good batteries (I use Powerex, and love them), the 430EXII will cycle pretty fast.

A $ per Ws comparison greatly favors the 430, and gives you the flexibility of having more individual strobes (if that's a benefit to your lighting style).  Most of the feature advantages of the 580 are negated by the fact that A. you have one already, and B. you can master with the 7d.

539
EOS Bodies / Re: Expo readout 7D
« on: January 20, 2011, 02:57:46 PM »
Ok, you don't need to mess with UDEV.

What you are looking for is USB filters in virtualbox http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&q=usb+filter+virtualbox&btnG=Google+Search&aq=0&oq=usb+filter+virt


540
EOS Bodies / Re: Expo readout 7D
« on: January 20, 2011, 02:02:29 PM »
Thanks.

I use Fedora 11 in VirtualBox(Win-> Fedora11)
Do I need any driver update on the Fedora before I connect the 7D or simply connect it?

I'm also running Fedora (14).

That is worded ambiguously, so I will assume that Fedora is the host (on the bare metal), and Windows is the guest (the VM).

Between UDEV and VBox there is a way to make certain USB ids go straight into the VM as soon as they are connected.  There is a guy I work with that has to do it to get his iPhone to work (also Fedora>VBox>Win).  I don't know the exact details, but some Googling should get you there.  I'll also see if I can get some details from the guy I work with.

Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 ... 40