May 22, 2013, 01:57:51 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - pdirestajr

Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 37
436
Software & Accessories / Re: Lightroom VS Photoshop
« on: April 27, 2012, 12:16:39 PM »
For me one of the biggest differences is the ability to do things in bulk.  I can have a whole set of photos that need some basic editing such as changing the color balance and bumping up the blacks.  I can do them all at once in LR.  There may be a way to do it in bulk in PS, but not that I've found (granted I'm a PS novice).    I also find the crop functionality of LR to be quicker and easier.  I own them both and do about 95-98% of my work in Lightroom.

Batch actions in PS would handle all of that quite nicely.

True, but you'd need several hundred batch actions to cover the possibilities that lightroom lets you do in seconds.  With lightroom, You just check those attributes you want copied, and select just the images you want them applied to.  You do not have to do a whole folder.  The flexability is what sets it apart.

You can do this with PS/ ACR too!
While in Bridge highlight one photo you have edited and press shortcut [option+command+C], then highlight any number of photos shot in the same lighting conditions and hit [option+command+V] and ALL of the settings will be applied to the photos. A dialogue box will even pop up with options to select which changes you want to apply.

Note: This is obviously only for ACR edits.

437
Lenses / Re: Why buy Canon when third party are this good?
« on: April 27, 2012, 11:28:52 AM »
1. I have a hard time spending over 1000.00 for a 3rd party lens.

2. At that price, I'm expecting to last a long time. How will this Tamron lens look and operate after 5+ years of use?

3. I know that Canon lenses hold their value really well. Who is going to pay you close to 1000 down the line for a used Tamron lens?

4. They are also reversed engineered, what if Canon makes a change in the future that affects how 3rd party lenses play with them?

438
What was the ISO, shutter speed & aperture of the OP's posted photo? To me, it just looks like a low light/ high ISO pic at a wide aperture... Where is the problem?

Add some sharpening in post. If it isn't sufficient, use a flash. There are limits.

I think it's crazy that people use these cameras to shoot in places that film could have never gone without flash, at crazy high ISO's, and expect low noise and super sharp photos!

439
With all respect, I don't think cameras or focusing systems, or even lenses make "soft" pictures- the photographer does. Every camera has limitations that need to be learned & mastered. It's just a tool at the end of the day.

440
This is a fun one not necessarily meant to show a great picture... Here are three pictures of the same statue (Rape of the Sabine Woman) in Florence, Italy that I took in three different years as I learned more about photography and upgraded equipment.

The first photo was taken in 2007 with a Panasonic DMC-FZ5 PnS.

The second photo was taken in 2009 with a Canon XTi and the kit lens.

The third photo was taken in 2010 with the Canon 5d mark ii and a 24-105L.

I plan on taking my 5d3 and a Zeiss lens next year!


Love this series! So great to see the shot taken over time. I had to dig up my photo of that statue too for this thread.

Taken with a Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T200:

rape of the sabine women by Philip DiResta, on Flickr

441
EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: 48fps - Too Fast?
« on: April 26, 2012, 01:28:31 PM »
Given how much everyone around here whinges and whines when the latest camera doesn't have 1080p60, I thought this was an interesting read:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-17836380
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/movies/2012/04/cinemacon-hobbit-frame-rate-depp-gatsby.html


People around here will "whine" about anything. If all cameras came with 1080p 60fps, they'd want 120fps or 4K video...

442
Canon General / Re: I've switched to the Dark Side (no, Literally).
« on: April 26, 2012, 01:22:22 PM »
Now, I understand that a lot of you here shoot digital. And that Film is basically dead. But, I was wondering if there was anyone out there who could suggest any good lenses for a film body. FD or FL. Also, I'd like to hear some suggestions on film. I've heard that the Kodak T-Max 400 (the one i've been using) is a really good film.


Check some of the flickr film groups, you'll quickly realize film is anything BUT dead. The group "I Shoot Film" has over 70,000 members and almost 2 MILLION photos!

Lots of great tutorials, links and people to learn from.

http://www.flickr.com/groups/ishootfilm/


443
Stunning work, folks. Please keep it coming :)



1000D + kit lens

Church light by Philip DiResta, on Flickr



This shot is blowing my mind. Was there much post processing work involved to make the beam of light stand out like that?


Thanks! I'm not religious, but being in Rome, in that church, with a Michelangelo statue of Christ behind me & that light coming through... was mind blowing to me too!

Not too much was done in post. I shot RAW, pushed the shadows to bring out more info in the church, applied some mid-tone contrast to bring out the texture, and added a bit of dodging & burning "to taste" (pushed beam a bit & reduced light hitting ceiling to bring attention down).

Here is the original:

santa maria sopra minerva by Philip DiResta, on Flickr

444
And something really cheap & old.
4 megapixel Powershot SD10!

Lex reading in Maui by Philip DiResta, on Flickr

445
1000D + EF-s 55-250IS

man by Philip DiResta, on Flickr

1000D + EF-s 55-250IS

green army man by Philip DiResta, on Flickr

1000D + kit lens

Church light by Philip DiResta, on Flickr

1000D + kit lens

Florence view by Philip DiResta, on Flickr

446
Instruction manual? If you don't have the camera yet, you can even read it first so when you get the camera you're ready to go!

447
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Puchasing 5D III off of Craiglist
« on: April 24, 2012, 02:37:32 PM »
He's probably selling kits as separate parts to make a few bucks.

But Why not just pay taxes & write the whole thing off? If you are a student, you can always file it as an expense.

448
EOS Bodies / Re: We need a "Canon Whiners" Section!
« on: April 24, 2012, 02:25:37 PM »
I am a happy Canon user.

I love my 7D- I know LOTS of people have issues with it's noise at super high ISOs while taking pictures of their cats in the dark, banding when they try to push their poorly exposed files 4 stops in post, or when they haven't learned the focusing system and blame said system...

And I couldn't be more excited to finally be adding a 5D mkII to my lineup for landscape, studio, macro, manual focus & video work... I'm sure I'll even figure out how to use it's AF system to capture the occasional impromptu portrait in focus.

And I won't be photographing brick walls, test charts or the the back of my lens cap- so I think I'll continue to be happy with the tools I have and grow as a photographer & artist.

Happy shooting all!

449
A few years ago, Apple used to make their own propriety CPUs for Macs. Does anyone remember that?  Then they had the "brilliant" idea: "why are we competing against Intel" in CPU technology?  That's a losing battle. So they dumped their own CPUs and started using the intel chip in Macs.

Canon is in a very similar situation right now. Nikon buys the best sensor from whereever they can find (Sony, Aptina, Renesas) and uses them in their own cameras, concentrating instead on the other aspects of a making a good camera (something that is Nikon's speciality).

Canon, on other hand, (just like Apple was against Intel), is stuck with "competing" in semiconductor technology against electronic companies like Sony (D800 sensor) Renesas (D3s sensor) and Aptina (Nikon 1 sensor).  Good luck with that.

This is 100% guranteed a losing battle.

Canon should seriopusly consider this: when upgrading 7D, put the best sensor in it, even if you have to buy it from a third party.

Or stay at the bottom of dxomark for the next several decades ... What's the probability Canon will start beating Sony (who makes 30 million sensors a month) in semiconductor technology?  Nill.  I actually predict the gap would get even bigger in future.

But wait. Aren't the 5D mkiii's OTHER FEATURES (besides the sensor) it's major advantage over the D800?
 
So if Nikon just "slapped a sensor" into their camera, what exactly were they doing the whole time? I don't think the the D800 is groundbreaking in any way besides the sensor. Based on the OP's theory, shouldn't they have had more time to perfect an ergonomically brilliant, award winning piece of design? That camera looks squished & melty and exploding with buttons, ports & dials to me.

Canon already had a pretty great sensor in the 5Dii, why is it so wrong that they chose to focus on ALL the other aspects of photography & not the "film". IF photographers can't make a decent exposure from that sensor, well, there are bigger problems.

450
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III in camera lens aberration correction
« on: April 23, 2012, 10:15:32 AM »
Does the the in-camera lens fix work with RAW files, or is it just processed jpegs?

Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 37