October 24, 2014, 08:10:04 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - AJ

Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 28
301
Imagine the culprit walking past security.  "Excuse me sir, is that a 180/2.8 OS in your pocket or are you happy to ...


302
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 28 f/2.8 Disappears From Price List
« on: January 13, 2012, 11:13:02 AM »
Honestly, I see no reason to own this lens. I've used it and it's slow to focus, loud, only 2.8 and the IQ is just okay. There are so many zooms that overlap this, and unless there's a real, quantifiable reason to own a prime, you're wasting your money. Pretty much my rule of thumb is, if you're happy with 2.8, get a zoom, if you want to do better, get a high quality prime. This lens failed on both counts. This is the lens you buy because it's cheap, then it sits in the bottom of your camera bag for 5 years collecting dust.
Yup.  True for FF, especially true for crop.

303
EOS Bodies / Re: DSLRs are a dying breed, EVIL is the future!
« on: January 12, 2012, 01:24:42 PM »
Back in the film days there were many mirrorless cameras, ranging from cheap point-n-shoots to high-quality rangefinders to big SLRs like EOS 3.

Back then, the small cameras didn't kill the SLRs.  I don't see why mirrorless digital cameras will kill DSLRs in the future.

Weren't rangefinder camera manual focus only ?

Yes indeed that's true.  Thanks for pointing that out

304
EOS Bodies / Re: DSLRs are a dying breed, EVIL is the future!
« on: January 12, 2012, 11:23:16 AM »
Back in the film days there were many mirrorless cameras, ranging from cheap point-n-shoots to high-quality rangefinders to big SLRs like EOS 3.

Back then, the small cameras didn't kill the SLRs.  I don't see why mirrorless digital cameras will kill DSLRs in the future.

Mirrors work, and they're not that expensive to produce.  Why strip them away?

On another note.  Personally I'm lusting for an EF mount camera with a full-frame sensor in a Rebel-like body (plastic+pentamirror = lightweight).  If you want to shave off weight, why not get rid of the metal body and big lumpy prism.  But I'm not holding my breath...

305
Lenses / Re: I guess there won't be any new lenses at CES?
« on: January 10, 2012, 12:49:17 AM »
Thanks waving_odd!

306
Landscape / Re: Winter Milky Way Time Lapse - (Canon 5D MK II)
« on: January 09, 2012, 02:38:47 PM »
Nice!  How did you control motion?

307
Lenses / Re: I guess there won't be any new lenses at CES?
« on: January 09, 2012, 01:26:15 PM »
Rats.  I was hoping for some non-L lenses (e.g. 50/1.4 mk2).

Anything from Tamron and Sigma?

308
Maybe hang on to that 55-250 for a little while longer.  There may be times when you may not want to tote that BWHL around.

BWHL - big white heavy lens.

309
EOS Bodies / Re: 7D sensor poll
« on: January 02, 2012, 01:59:50 PM »
APS-C, because it'll accept EF-S lenses like 17-55/2.8

310
EOS Bodies / Re: How should I spend my money?
« on: December 29, 2011, 03:35:29 PM »
I meant Tokina 11-16/2.8.  Thanks

311
EOS Bodies / Re: How should I spend my money?
« on: December 29, 2011, 02:18:22 PM »
Tokina 11-17/2.8

312
Lenses / Re: A set of lenses for around the world travel.
« on: December 28, 2011, 11:27:50 AM »
1 lens solution.  Canon 15-85 IS bolted onto your 450D.  Simple, light, versatile, great image quality.

3 lens solution.  Your 450D, your Sigma 8-16, then add Tamron 17-50/2.8 (or Canon 17-55/2.8 IS which is heavier)  plus Canon 55-250 IS.

My travel setup is similar to the 3 lens option above.  I used it in SE Asia for 3 months this year, plus another 1 month in the U.S., plus another 1 month backpacking at home in Canada.  I've used a similar setup for a cumulative of at least 18 months on the road over the past 5 years.

Your 450D is a camera capable of great photos.  No need to upgrade to something heavier.

Enjoy your trip.

313
EOS Bodies / Re: New to Full Frame - some help with lens(es)?
« on: December 23, 2011, 01:27:35 PM »
If you like a wider angle, think about a 35 mm lens.  Consider 35/2, 35/1.4L, and Samyang 35/1.4 (manual focus).

314
EOS Bodies / Re: What if - interchengeable sensors
« on: December 21, 2011, 06:48:44 PM »
I want to be able to tilt my camera's sensor

315
Canon General / Re: An EF 70-200 f/4L IS II in Mid January? [CR1]
« on: December 11, 2011, 11:49:11 PM »
If you had carte blanche to upgrade this lens, what would you do? What specs would it have after your upgrades?

Paint it black

Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 28