April 16, 2014, 12:35:09 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - charlesa

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21
286
EOS Bodies - For Stills / 1DX silent mode?
« on: July 13, 2012, 03:14:36 PM »
Does the 1DX have a silent shutter shooting mode similar to that implemented on the 5D III? Well, not completely silent that is. Although if you want to use silent mode with a big spanking 1D body pointed at someone during street shooting, no amount of silent shooting will cover what you are doing pointing such a tank at someone IMHO!

287
2000 eur 2 years ago, and will never regret it. I still kept the 135 mm f/2 though. Bokeh, sharpness of both is outstanding.

288
Not really, no. They are called pro bodies for a reason, and Canon knows it.

289
Sports / Re: Waterpolo
« on: July 12, 2012, 10:56:55 AM »
Thanks for all the advice.

290
It's a brilliant lens but I am not sure landscape shots would be suitable for its niche market, after all the distortion is quite noticeable, even at 15 mm. A TS-E lens would probably be a better landscape lens, but manual focus only, more expensive and a has a steeper learning curve.

291
Sports / Re: Waterpolo
« on: July 11, 2012, 08:52:07 AM »
Outdoor, and I am allowed to move.

292
Sports / Waterpolo
« on: July 11, 2012, 06:10:16 AM »
Hi to all

Will start shooting swimming events, mainly trials and waterpolo, any tips on where best to stand pool side? Have 70-200 and 400 mm f/2.8, should cover the range required nicely.

293
I have a 1D X on preorder, need it mostly for sports and wildlife. Canon kindly provided me with a 5D Mark III till my 1DX preorder is fulfilled, after testing the 5DIII extensively, I can say I am impressed. Impressive ISO performance and IQ quality, 6 fps is enough for most types of photography and the body is well built. But for my needs, the 1DX is a better fit.

294
Lenses / Re: 400 mm f/2.8 L Mk I
« on: July 08, 2012, 02:45:35 PM »
Actually considering a Gitzo monopod with a RRS MH01 head, but as I asked, is it actually possible to put a Wimberley on a monopod?

295
Lenses / Re: 400 mm f/2.8 L Mk I
« on: July 07, 2012, 07:05:09 PM »
Would it be doable to actually put a Wimberley on a monopod? Sounds strange to me but the thought arose.

296
Lenses / Re: Filters for TS lenses
« on: July 06, 2012, 09:10:55 AM »
Thank you neuroanatomist for quick reply... any of those filters available for sale through some retailer in the EU? Oh... and leave the glia and the Purkinje in peace!  ;D

297
Lenses / Filters for TS lenses
« on: July 05, 2012, 03:53:41 PM »
Anyone have any idea if ND or full grad filters would fit on a TS-E 24 mm f/2.5 L II in view of the lens design? Hitech, Lee, Cokin, Singh Ray?

298
Lenses / Re: Which lenses to pick up next?
« on: July 05, 2012, 03:52:17 PM »
100 mm f/2.8 L IS. Simply a beauty of a lens, both for macro and as a portrait prime. Bokeh master me calls it!

299
Lenses / Re: Owning the Canon 200-400 f/4L Vs 400 f/2.8L II
« on: July 05, 2012, 03:50:14 PM »
Why not go for a 400 mm f/2.8 L IS prime? Their price should come down now that version II is out, and the 200-400 will cost way more, and can one really comment on its IQ and sharpness prior to anyone ever seen or tested on in the wild? If it has the image quality of the 70-200 mm f/2.8 II then it would be a stunner of a lens, but at what price?

I was recently stuck in the same conundrum, until I found a second hand 400 for sale, pristine condition, tried it on a 1D-X (including with a 2x TC III) and was blown away.

300
Start to ponder the D800, then I look at the 400 mm f/2.8 glass sitting on my desk and I smile and all black thoughts evaporate  ;D

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21