release the darn camera already !!
LOL, my money is allocated and ready sprout wings as soon as they do release it!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I'm not really sure it would actually matter. The 70-200 can resolve more detail than the 18-135 yes, but it's only a 2mp image anyway. As long as both lenses resolve more tha 2mp does it matter?
NR processing is performed in-camera on the data coming off the sensor, prior to the RAW image being written.
the 3x crop mode is decidedly soft compared to the standard video; it has less artifacts (no line-skipping-induced aliasing/moire), but if you see tests of 3x crop vs zooming with the lens, the 3x crop is comparatively soft:
that's because, even if it is 2.7x instead of 3x, as pgabor says, it's too much: you need at least a 2.5K bayer pattern to create a sharp 2K image
still, if you need it, it's really useful; but it has limitations
The focus shift is an annoyance. Raw performance doesn't matter if systematic errors spoil the game. That puts both the 50/1,2L and the Sigma 50/1,4 rather low on my list.
#1 is the 'body adjustment' and #2 is the 'lens adjustment', but your suggestion would require the ability to set the C.Fn to 1+2, and you can only make one selection.
I'm giving the PhaseONE Capture One Pro 6 product a whirl. Just bought a copy after seeing some very good reports on it, will post findings in a couple of weeks...