Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Many laptops do not have CD Rom drives, so this is a solution.
Buy a copy of CS6 and only pay for LR thru CC or if they continue to use retail copy's. you can convert your RAWs to DNGs later on to continue editing in CS6 for years.
That's my plan anyway.
I've seen that before...seems to me that a lever release clamp on a dangling strap would be the quickest transition from hip to pavement.
That's what I first thought when I saw it. A demonstration showed that you push a button on the lever to release it (much like a lock-back knife) and that bumping the lever in either direction will not release it.
Thanks - that makes a lot more sense!
And how much more are you willing to pay? And I'll be willing to bet they would need to do at least some revision of the optical formula since the tube would now be physically longer to accommodate the built-in TC. Or something. Anyway, personally I don't see why you would need to switch on the TC that quickly on your super-teles, but if you use them all the time maybe you have a use-case that would be useful to a large number of users.
Well, sure, you can stack TC's now, they just are different physical things. I imagine it'd be quite a bit more complicated to have one device that you introduce the different optics into position. More complicated mechanically, which introduces many more points of failure, and probably much more complicated optically unless it simply lifts one of the optics out of the way and puts another in it's place. Theoretically possible...but why? Just pull off the lens, and stack your TCs.
These big companies almost ask to be pirated.
What happened to the days where a craftsman made an excellent product and then sold said product for cash? Oh yeah, pirates. :|
So to stop pirates, (which this CC won't) they will rent you said tool and if you make thousands of files with that tool and don't pay, instantly those are thousands of useless files. I don't like that idea, I'd rather just buy the tool.
Am I strange?
1) EF 100-400/f4.0-5.6 IS
turning zoom, IQ and build quality as good as the 70-200 / 2.8 L IS II
price approx. USD 2,200 - including tripod ring!
2) EF-F 50-150/2.8 L IS
IQ and build-quality as good as the 70-200 2.8 L IS II but as compact, light and black as the Sigma 50-150 / 2.8
price? USD 1,300
3) EF 16-35 /2.8 L IS
optically as good as the 24-70 II
price USD 1,500
4) EF 20/4.0 pancake
as compact, cheap and good as the 40/2.8 pancake
priced at 250 USD
5) EF 24-105/4.0 L IS II
IQ and build quality like the 24-70 II
priced at USD 1,000
Here is an awesome comparison between these cameras:
Nikon D7100 vs Canon 7D - Fight! - Photography Feature Challenge - Best APS-C DSLR?
Looks like Canon is still a favorite for sports and wildlife in many ways though the Nikon does have some tempting features.
My AFMA test results differ between wide open and stopped down to the sharpest aperture, why?
Possibly focus shift (with some lenses, stopping down shifts the focal plane).
Seriously?? Never heard of that before. Will be interesting to see if I can spurious results when I test my lens.
The 50L is notorious for it, for example.
