August 20, 2014, 05:45:07 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dadgummit

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8
16
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS M Vanishes from Canon USA Web Site
« on: June 04, 2014, 11:26:41 AM »
I would never have purchased the M at it's real price, but I got a great deal on the set with the body, flash, and both US lenses.  I don't really understand the way people go on and on complaining about it - those complaints might have validity in terms of price, but since the firmware update, it's a solid little camera.  As I've said before, my favorite thing about the camera is that it's an EOS.  Other than 2 or 3 unique settings, you can pick the thing up and never read the manual.  I love that.  The other small cameras I have used have such crappy menus they made me want to throw them against the wall.  For example, if I want to set the M to a flash sync speed between 1/60s & 1/200s, I can.  It's just like every other EOS I've used.  The touchscreen is pretty cool, too.

Yes I love my little M.  I plan to convert it to infrared once I find out if canon is going to make an updated version or if they force me to go to Sony or Fuji for my mirrorless needs.


Absolutely agree, I really like my EOS-m, best compact ever as far as I am concerned, mainly because it is an exceptionally small travel backup when I already have the lenses. For me EOS system integration was the primary selling point, but I don't find the AF or anything else about it disheartening. I'll be very interested if they import the M3 and it can use the G1X MkII EVF.

17
To be truly class leading you need to be better than everything else out there.  When you look at how far behind canon is with DR and even noise to a lesser extent I would be satisfied with just catching the competition instead of leapfrogging it.

Hmmm  A Dual pixel 25-30mp sensor that has similar DR and Hi-ISO noise to Sony/Nikon, that would be awesome!

18
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS M Vanishes from Canon USA Web Site
« on: May 30, 2014, 11:41:25 AM »
Dual pixel AF system in the next EOS M = winning product.
My ha'penny worth.

I hope this comes true.  I love my little M, yesterday was my daughter's school play and when it came time to leave I chose the M with 18-55stm over the 5d3 and I am glad I did. 

I would pre-order the EOS M with dual pixel!  That way I can send my M out to be converted to infrared.

19
There is also the very strong likelihood it will get dual memory cards (I TRULY hope for dual CF/CFast2, but I suspect the 7D II will be gimped just like the 5D III with a CF and SD slot...in which case the feature is largely useless.)

Why is two different kinds of cards "useless"?  I'm not a pro, so maybe I'm missing something, but I kind of like the two different cards, shoot jpg to one and raw to the other.

It is only useless if the SD slot is not capable of actually using high speed cards.  Unfortunately the 5d3 cannot take advantage of good sd cards.

20
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 70d center focus point -bug- problem
« on: May 16, 2014, 11:18:08 AM »
I don't know if there is a bug or not but I just purchased a new 70D from B&H last week and the center focus point works perfectly with the 85mm f1.2 and other faster than f2.8 lenses.

Personally I am willing to bet that there are a few defective cameras out there with some kind of issue and when other people start pixel peeping their fast lenses at long distances the are surprized that the camera has issues getting a sharp f1.4 shot at 20 feet out.  So they think they have the issue too. 

Whenever I shoot a wedding with low light I have the cameras in High speed continuous all the time.  Out of 4 shots of the bride eating her cake maybe 2 are in perfect focus.  The ironic thing is that she will often choose one of the less perfect shiots for her 8x10 and guess what it, comes out great!  Pixel Peeping has made the lives of Canon's engineers in the af department very difficult. 

21
EF-S 10-18 f/4.5-5.6 IS STM   Meh.....

Less range, slower focus motor, IS where it is not needed, less light, it had better be $300 or less because it is only good for video.

22
Lenses / Re: Review: Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Lens
« on: April 28, 2014, 07:43:48 PM »
Out of focus looks pretty good, no onion either.  I like what I see.  I am really rooting for this one to be good.  I have lost the sigma lottery way too many times to preorder though. 

23
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: New Samyang Lenses Go On Sale Tomorrow
« on: April 28, 2014, 10:59:40 AM »
If it has auto exposure (auto aperture) it will have focus confirm as well.  Like a Zeiss lens I am assuming.

24
Lenses / Re: Review: Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Lens
« on: April 22, 2014, 10:53:36 AM »
"occasional AF inconsistency"

Noooooooooooooooooooooo!!  This is why I retuned all of the copies of their old 50mm...  Hopefully the Sigma dock can fix this.

Otherwise the review looks great.  My biggest concern with this lens was if it sacrificed a nice smooth OOF for sharpness.  The few "Bokeh" (I never know if I am using that word correctly) pictures I have seen look good though. 

25
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art Available for Preorder
« on: April 11, 2014, 10:46:25 AM »
Oh, man...  What to do, I told my-self if it came in at $899 I would pre-order.

26
Meh.....

Over $500 for a manual focus lens that is only 1/2 stop faster than a similar priced zoom that is already well regarded.  I expect to see the street price around $250-300 if they actually want to sell any.  Crop users are usually less likely to use primes so the price had better be attractive.

The 14mm UWA was great because it was wider than the canon zooms available.

27
If you want a lens that will last more than a year or so It looks like the new Sigma 50 will be our only option now that it is rumored that canon is unveiling another micro usm in their new yet-to-be-announced 50.

When did the 50mm go from being the standard to being the dumping ground for fragile or focus shifting lenses? My first slr was a 55mm and that was the only lens I had, I still have a fondness for that length but the only one I have in my kit is the Zeiss 50MP.

28
Lenses / Re: New EF-S 24mm & USM Motor Coming? [CR1]
« on: February 18, 2014, 11:25:01 AM »
We’re also told that a new USM motor will also be introduced some time this year, and it will be called “C-USM”, which stands for Compact Ultrasonic Motor. This technology is likely to first appear in a new 50mm lens.

No no no no no!!!  It is a compact USM motor that made the last 50mm f1.4 a piece of unreliable garbage.  Why would you do this again when you already have a reliable usm motor that is small enough to fit in the new 24, 28, 35 mm IS lenses?

29
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art: Next week at CP+?
« on: February 10, 2014, 01:27:36 PM »
Sigma has updated the lens page. Two interesting points:

According to Sigma, this is "the best 50mm in the history of photography".

The weight is a whopping 815g!

Well I guess the Zeiss Otus is a 55mm not 50mm.  The rest of the 50mm competition is not all that great so they may have a valid claim if the MTF charts are true.  Here is to hoping it comes in at a sub $900 street price.  if it does I will pre-order. 

30
PowerShot / Re: Updated PowerShot G1 X II Specs
« on: February 10, 2014, 11:29:15 AM »
I wonder if Canon thinks this is the American substitute for the EOS M?  It seems like they may classify the M system as Asia only.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8