July 30, 2014, 02:56:02 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dadgummit

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8
31
Lenses / Re: Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art Price leaked
« on: February 06, 2014, 10:37:26 PM »
$1300 for a 50mm f1.4?!?!?!?  Maybe if it had Canon AF but that is waaaay too steep considering you have to play the sigma lottery.  I was going to pre-order this lens if it was in the $800 range but for $1300 i'm out.....

32
Lenses / Re: Another Mention of a New Macro Lens in 2014 [CR1]
« on: February 05, 2014, 06:06:43 PM »
a say, 135 (150) - 200mm (or 180mm) macro with 1:1 at 200mm and IS does not sound implausible. zooming out while keeping the same distance would allow for easier framing, would allow better flexibility getting the shot.

I don't see a 150-200 range to be enough to make it worthwile to bother with the complication of a zoom lens over a prime. 

I was thinking a 100-200mm f3.5L IS USM with inner zooming (does not extend) that costs about $1500 street and 1800-2000 MSRP at launch.    1:2 at 100 zooming to 1:1 at 200.  I do like the idea of no focus breathing (hope I am using the term correctly)

Personally I would prefer a 50-150 f2.8 IS USM this would be a much more useful range for all of my Macro purposes.

33
Lenses / Re: Another Mention of a New Macro Lens in 2014 [CR1]
« on: February 05, 2014, 06:00:36 PM »
120mm TS-E macro  ;D

That would be a very cool lens that I could not afford.  It would probably cost $2500-3000. 

34
The Sony a7r seems like the Canon full frame mirrorless we have been waiting for.  In fact it is exactly the same as if Canon produced it:

If canon had a Mirrorless FF:
you would buy the new body
There would be a couple of special naitive lenses available that are not useful on any other camera
you would buy the adapter to use your Canon glass.

With Sony's Mirrorless FF:
you would buy the new body
There are a couple of special naitive lenses available that are not useful on any other camera
you would buy the adapter to use your Canon glass.
 
Exactly the same thing with one exception...  you would get better DR with the Sony sensor.

35
EOS Bodies / Re: Announcement Talk Begins
« on: January 03, 2014, 01:38:04 PM »
Not likely to happen at all but I would love a SL1 sized body with some 70D features like the dual pixel sensor, AFMA, etc.  Add an EOS-M style touch screen and we have my perfect camera.

36
EOS Bodies / Re: Announcement Talk Begins
« on: January 03, 2014, 11:11:30 AM »
Please Canon.  Just give us a good fast 50mm!!!! Not one with a plastic mount, not one with an unreliable micro usm focus motor and not one with focus shift!!

I grew up on 50mm and it is still my favorite walk around length. 
 
Oh, and please release it in N America...

37
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Grab a Pancake! $129 at B&H Photo
« on: December 19, 2013, 11:48:17 AM »
I really don't need one but for $129 free ship and no tax I just cannot resist!!  worst case I can just sell it after the BH sale for what I paid.

38
EOS Bodies / Re: A New EOS M with EVF Second Half of 2014?
« on: December 09, 2013, 11:09:15 AM »
Just give me the M or M2 with the 70D Sensor.  that is all I want, otnerwise the system is perfect. 

The EVF will just add bulk.  If I want a view finder I will use the 5d3 or the 7d,  It really is not that hard to frame a shot with the screen on the back.   The whole point of mirrorless is the small size .  I am glad Canon is at least getting that right if little else. 

39
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.3 VC on Thursday
« on: November 05, 2013, 09:17:14 PM »
Tamron's problem is that what made the 200-500 an option (cheap, light) might be lost with the addition of 50mm and VC. The 200-500 retailed at $1995 (though it obviously now sells for <$1000), and if this doesnt come in around that price point, what differentiates it from the various Sigma's, the 100-400L (and its possible update), etc?

I can get 150-500 and 120-400 for about $1000 from Sigma...I can get 50-500 for $1500. The Tamron is gonna have to be really sharp or really light

These are my thoughts exactly.  I am not at all interested unless it has good optics and is inexpensive.

40
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Off Brand: Nikon Announces the Df
« on: November 05, 2013, 11:07:14 AM »
I am sorry to say but I am a total sucker for retro.  I would buy this in a heartbeat if it were canon. 

Though I don't understand why they did not include video, wouldn't make much of a difference to me since I have used it exactly once on my 5d3 just to try it out. 

41
EOS Bodies / Re: An Announcement Coming in November? [CR1]
« on: October 31, 2013, 03:15:16 PM »
My hope is it's the EF 50mm f/XX IS USM.  :)

Cannot happen.  I thought there was a law out there somewhere that Canon was not allowed to have a fast 50mm with good build, good bokeh and reliable auto focusing.  There are options to pick one or two but not all 3. 

42
What makes you think there's not an upgrade path?   :o


I'd consider the 1Dx a downgrade from just about every camera Canon makes, primarily because the portrait grip isn't removable, and I don't need or want it.  It's why I've never seriously considered any 1-series camera, nor will I in the future until and unless they go back to the 1V-style removable grip.


Strange ... That has to be the first ever comment I've seen of someone complaining about the inbuilt grip on a 1 series body but I guess it is a personal preference.

BTW, both my 5D3 and the 6D are gripped. Never taken the grip off them


I am in the same boat.  I just don't want the huge camera body, too heavy and akward.  I feel the 5d3's battery lasts a long time and it really only takes like 5 seconds to change it when it gets low.  I would much rather have an extra battery in my pocket than a large hunk of magneseum hanging off the bottom of my camera just to double the battery capacity. 

43
Canon General / Re: Official: Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS
« on: October 14, 2013, 02:10:38 PM »
If this lens is awesome, I'll sell my EF 24-105 f4 to help pay for it.

However...in this range, I'm dying to see what the rumored Siggy 24-70 f2 will look like.  I'll probably hold off on anything until it's revealed (IF it's revealed).

If this lens has a 82mm filter size for an f4 lens I cannot wait to see what an f2 zoom would have....

44
Lenses / Re: A New 50 Coming Soon? [CR1]
« on: October 14, 2013, 10:59:54 AM »
If I get 10 years out of it, it'll cost me roughly £100 / year for reliable no worry usage. If I sell it for 80% of what I bought it for....then that's even better.

Same reason here for upgrading from the 100mm non-L macro to the L version ... and my primary concern with the new non-L IS lenses, it's seldom mentioned in tech geek threads. I don't buy red ring because it looks cool (actually I taped it), but because it's much more reliable, and even after less than 10years I'm pretty confident with my 100L/70-300L/17-40L.

I have had the 100mm Macro for about 6 years and it works as good as the day I first opened the box.  What reliability concerns do you have? I would think that since the L has IS, and IS is almost always the weak link in any lens' reliability I would assume the older lens would last longer than the L.

45
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« on: October 13, 2013, 11:36:17 AM »
Meh...  Bigger and heavier than an already existing canon L lens... With the recent sales this lens cannot be any less expensive than the canon.  So I guess the major draw is you get to play the Sigma lottery and have the fun of exchanging for one that does not have some strange focusing problem. 

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8