Show Posts

106

Lenses / Re: 135mm or 50mm...

« on: October 30, 2012, 09:44:48 AM »

I had the 50L and returned it. Hated the focus shift issue and really didn't like the focal length. I own the 135L and wouldn't trade it for anything. One of my best lenses. Also note the big difference in focal length between the 50 and the 135. Most people would not compare those two lenses as they produce very different results.

Some recent 135L info... http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=10410.msg188456#msg188456

107

Lenses / Re: Need comparisons between Canon 135L vs 100L

« on: October 30, 2012, 09:23:56 AM »

Quote from: killswitch on October 30, 2012, 02:17:52 AM

Quote from: Studio1930 on October 23, 2012, 02:07:26 PM
I don't have the 100L but I do have the 135L and it is a must have lens IMO. The 100L is a macro so I would not compare them I would just consider them for different purposes. I do have the 70-200 f/2.8 II and while it is an excellent work horse lens, it is not the same as the 135L. I use them for different purposes as well and I need them both. The 135L is very light and easy to use as a walk around lens.

135L examples with minimal editing...

Darn! I dunno what to say but these are some of the best photos I have seen in recent times. Did you get these colors and contrast right off the bat? Please say yes! =O

Yes, the 1DX and 135 f/2 combo does a great job. I spent about 45 seconds editing each of these. Love that lens.

108

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Semi-Erotic Photography: Questions...

« on: October 25, 2012, 03:43:19 PM »

You might want to Google 2257 compliance.

109

Canon General / Re: Noise Question

« on: October 25, 2012, 12:12:45 PM »

Yes, it does depend on the camera model for the in-between ISO noise issue. The 1DX does not appear to have this issue but the 5D3 does. For my 1DX, I have stopped worrying about in-between ISO settings but it appears you still need to remember them for the 5D3.

http://home.comcast.net/~NikonD70/Charts/RN_ADU.htm#EOS%201D%20X_14,EOS%205D%20Mark%20III_14

110

1D X Sample Images / Re: Any Thing shot with a 1Dx

« on: October 25, 2012, 01:40:57 AM »

I can finally shoot the 85L at f/1.2 with confidence thanks to the 1DX. Wonderful combination. It was too unpredictable with my 1DsM3.

111

Lenses / Re: Need comparisons between Canon 135L vs 100L

« on: October 23, 2012, 03:15:09 PM »

Quote from: cayenne on October 23, 2012, 02:19:20 PM

Beautiful pics....and always great to see a happy puppy!!

Can you go a bit more in depth to explain when you say "I do have the 70-200 f/2.8 II and while it is an excellent work horse lens, it is not the same as the 135L. I use them for different purposes as well and I need them both. " ?

What are the specific purposes you use the 135L for? What specific purposes do you use the 70-200 f/2.8 II for?

Again, thanks to you and to everyone for the replies....

cayenne

First off, I always use a prime over a zoom when I can. But if I need a zoom due to fast moving subjects (I can't run around and shoot a moving subject like a child or animal) or if I need excellent tracking then I would use the 70-200 over the 135L. I think the 70-200 also does a better job acquiring focus lock in low light than my 135L but I honestly don't even try to use the 135L in low light much at all. If I am unsure of what I'll run into situation wise then I would take the zoom.

Now if I know that I will control the shooting situation and the light is okay then I'll use the prime 135L. If I know that I need to carry the camera and lens around for many hours then I might also take the 135L since it is waaaay lighter. And if I want to get a semi-circular smear then I will use the 135L or the 85L wide open. The 70-200 wide open just can't produce that look.

Hope that helps.

112

Lenses / Re: Need comparisons between Canon 135L vs 100L

« on: October 23, 2012, 02:07:26 PM »

I don't have the 100L but I do have the 135L and it is a must have lens IMO. The 100L is a macro so I would not compare them I would just consider them for different purposes. I do have the 70-200 f/2.8 II and while it is an excellent work horse lens, it is not the same as the 135L. I use them for different purposes as well and I need them both. The 135L is very light and easy to use as a walk around lens.

135L examples with minimal editing...

113

Technical Support / Re: how she got this look/light to work above sync speed

« on: October 23, 2012, 11:49:10 AM »

Quote from: Plato the Wise on October 23, 2012, 11:33:48 AM

Use an ND filter or forget about the strobes and use a scrim and reflectors.

I presume the OP wants to use the strobes but you are correct that you can sometimes achieve a similar look with reflectors and an ND filter when light is available to reflect.

Sometimes you won't even need an ND if you shoot a fast shutter with a reflector.

114

Technical Support / Re: how she got this look/light to work above sync speed

« on: October 23, 2012, 11:06:32 AM »

Also note that you can cheat the shutter a bit. One of her shots was at 320/s and didn't appear to have much light from the flash and was mostly in the upper part of the image. Shooting manual with off camera strobe and shooting above the sync speed would work in this case (without the need for a high speed sync trigger/rec). I have cheated the shutter many times when the sun was providing most of the light. Some cameras just need to be turned upside down or vertical grip down depending on the way your shutter moves and where you need to cheat the light. Also, some 1 series Canon cameras can actually sync above their rated value without the shutter showing in the shot. Not sure about the 5DM3.

Edit: Also note that the 85L and a strong ND = not so fast focus. It will hunt more.

115

Technical Support / Re: how she got this look/light to work above sync speed

« on: October 23, 2012, 10:47:20 AM »

I use my 85L at around f/2 in bright sunlight with the use of an ND filter (not grads). A proper ND filter will not soften your image. This allows me to use big studio strobes (3200 ws) to overpower the sun but balance the ambient light and stay under 250/s. Also, radio poppers will allow high speed sync with some studio strobes like white lightnings/alien bees.

116

1D X Sample Images / Re: Any Thing shot with a 1Dx

« on: October 23, 2012, 09:40:55 AM »

Quote from: K-amps on October 22, 2012, 12:57:02 PM

While I lust for a super tele like Gary's .... the shots that I want to take are often what I see of the 200 F2.... such an amazing lens...

I agree K-amps. It is hard to believe how good the shots look nearly straight out of the camera like this from the 200 f/2 (and the 1DX)...

117

Reviews / Re: My Mini-Review of the 85mm 1.2L II.

« on: October 23, 2012, 09:28:53 AM »

I agree that the build quality is not all that great on the 85L. I own one and had to have it serviced twice. The front element is screwed in like a filter and is only held in place by a tab (or two) and some glue. If you get a filter stuck and try to unscrew it with force/strength then you can unscrew the front element. That is what happened to mine. Be careful with that lens but enjoy it.

118