« on: August 16, 2012, 11:34:33 AM »
Very nice work! Thanks for sharing your setup info.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Some people tested the f2.8 @ 135mm being sharper or at least similar to the 135 @f2.8
135L hands down. It's has less distortion, more compression, is much cheaper, and is Uber Sharp.
The 85L is awesome too but it still may distort faces alittle more when getting too close on FF and the bokeh is more "creamy" on this lens.
I prefer more compression but Distortion can look good on certain subjects.
Yeah but he already has the 70-200 II, which honestly is just as sharp as the 135L.
Question for those suggesting the 135L - the OP has the 70-200/2.8L IS II...does that change your opinion? Just curious...Thanks Neuro. I have never shot anything below f2.8, so please elaborate on using the 3 stop ND, would I still over expose if I had the shutter at 1/8000th of a sec?
On bright days, 1/8000 s has sometimes been insufficient for me, even at ISO 50.
Thanks thats the exact response I was looking for.
|Small | Large|
I have it all insured with Farmers via Geico. About $1.6 per $100 insured. No deductible.