May 18, 2013, 08:55:25 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Richard Lane

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 13
1
1D X Sample Images / Re: 1dx + 400mm 2.8 @Axalp Switzerland
« on: October 18, 2012, 02:03:24 PM »
Welcome!

Great set!!  I really enjoyed viewing them.  I especially love the action, composition, and surrounding landcsape.  The only thing that I would add to this, is to use a slower shutter-speed on the helicopters in order to achieve some prop blur.

Rich

2
I beleive they left off the 400mm f/2.8L IS becuse that lens could already focus on the 1DX with the 2X extender prior to the firmware update, because it's max. aperture is only f/5.6.   :)

Except...they do list 300/2.8L IS, 300/2.8L IS II, and 400/2.8L IS, as well as a whole bunch of other f/2.8 primes and zooms, all of which could AF at f/5.6 with cross-type points prior to the v1.1.1 firmware.  They also list a bunch of f/2.8 and f/4 lenses on the 1.4x list, and on that list, the 400/2.8L IS II is included.  They just don't list the 400/2.8L IS II on the 2x list.

I was merely reassuring the posters concerns regarding support for the 400mm f/2.8 plus 2X combination, whether or not it was on the list.

3
Good news. But, the Lens EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM isn't supported with EF 2x?

I'm missing the lens here: http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/standard_display/EOS1DX_firmware

JH


I beleive they left off the 400mm f/2.8L IS becuse that lens could already focus on the 1DX with the 2X extender prior to the firmware update, because it's max. aperture is only f/5.6.   :)

Rich

4
Lenses / Re: Golf Tournament
« on: October 14, 2012, 08:40:40 PM »
I don't shoot Golf myself (well, photograph Golf), but I had this page bookmarked from another thread.

I thought it may come in a handy one day, and hopefully today is that day.  8)

http://blog.photoshelter.com/2009/07/fore-how-to-photograph-golf-li/

5
Software & Accessories / Re: Hand Strap Question
« on: October 14, 2012, 04:46:12 PM »
I found several wrist straps that will likely work, like this one..........
http://www.upstrap-pro.com/product/SG-XX-LOOP.html

I like the one that you found better since it looks stronger than the compact ones that I found.
This one looks like it should do a pretty good job for you.

6
Software & Accessories / Re: Hand Strap Question
« on: October 14, 2012, 11:01:35 AM »
Not sure I understand the problem.


I think that the OP is referring to the idea that once his hand is placed through the hand strap, then he would have to take his hand out of the strap to change to portrait orientation and use the shutter button on the grip, as opposed to rotating his wrist while inserted in the hand strap.  So, it will be inconvenient to do this all day and he will also lose the safety factor of the hand strap when in portrait orientation/mode.

I could be wrong though!  ;)

A wrist strap with a long tether may work, if it is long enough to allow you to change your grip: These are for a compact camera, but I think it would hold the weight in the event of a drop, but please don't take my word for it. :)

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/616534-REG/Nikon_25770_AN_CP19_Strap.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/699435-REG/Pentax_39857_O_ST104_Carabiner_Strap.html

Do a search of wrist straps.  I also like the black rapid strap over my shoulder at events where people can bump into you, causing you to lose your grip.


7
Software & Accessories / Re: Arca-Swiss requires plate
« on: October 14, 2012, 09:55:53 AM »

Will fit right in to the Arca Z1 ball head's clamp (I think I want the Arca with the screw and not the lever, unless those with experience recommend otherwise?). 

So that advantage with the RRS plate is that it made to fit and will stay square on the body and will not twist like my annoying inexpensive manfrotto set up.  But that plate is next to useless for my 200/2, but I never put that lens on a tripod; it's a handheld lens only for me.

The Arca Swiss Head is considered one of the top ballheads, as is the RRS-55, and Markins Q-Ball M20 (many users and reviewers described the Markins as slightly smoother than the RRS-55, that's why I went that route). FWIW, the Arca Swiss is considered buttery smooth as well.  I bought the Markins without a clamp and then I purchased the RRS Quick release lever clamp (B2 LR II: 60mm LR clamp with dual mount) and attached it to the Markins head with the included screw. However, I don't think you can go wrong with any of the top 3 ballheads above.  Personally, I happen to like the lower center of gravity of the RRS-55 design, as compared to the Markins and Arca swiss.

Another thing I like about RRS, is that you are not only buying a clamp or lens plate, but you are buying into a totally compatible system in which everything that they design works very well together. For me the ballhead was less important than the interaction between the camera/lens plate and clamp. I use all RRS camera L-brackets and lens plates and I have one wimberley plate which works perfectly with the RRS lever clamp on my ballhead and monopod head.

I prefer the QR lever clamp over the knob clamp.  The QR lever is either open or closed, and that is easily determined by just a quick glance at it. If you look at the knob clamp, you can't tell if it's loose or tight.  You have to actually check it with your hand.  So, there is a tendency to keep tightening it all day.  The other thing I like about the QR lever is that, it is not a knob, so it has a different feel to it. 

Many ballheads use knobs for tensioning the ballhead or for panning.  So, if you are looking through the VF and want to reach down and loosen the panning knob or adjust the ball head knob, then there is no way that you would accidentally loosen the QR lever, because they feel so different.  This is not the case if you have only knobs.

Sometimes I also like to rest my left hand around the top of the ballhead and the knob can get in the way.  I also have the QR lever on my RRS monopod head because I was afraid that all of the positioning, rotating and twisting about with the monopod, could accidentally loosen the clamping knob.

The other nice thing about the RRS QR lever if you should choose to ever get an RRS monopod head, is that for birds in flight, the RRS head uses a knob for tilting the head upwards, and that knob could also easily be mistaken and loosened for the lens plate clamp knob.  With the QR lever there is no chance of that happening.

One word of caution regarding the QR lever, is if you're carrying your tripod over your shoulder, is to make sure that the you don't accidentally catch the QR lever on a piece of clothing (that could actually open it) when you bring the tripod back down to ground level.  I have never done this, but I'm aware of it.  The QR lever actually has a tight fit against the clamp, so there's probably only a very slim chance of catching it.  Some QR levers like the Arca Swiss brand have a lock, which is a nice touch.

Rich

8
Lenses / Re: New 600mm f/4L IS Mk II - availability?
« on: October 12, 2012, 06:21:14 PM »
Gitzo had recently updated their 3 series line and now they appear to be updating the 5 series. 

It also looks like they've added a Series 4 Carbon to the systematic line.

The series 4 and series 5 carbons are toward the bottom of the page:

http://www.gitzo.us/photo-tripods-systematic?n=0&va=t

Competition is good!

9
Canon General / Re: Weathersealed Camera Gear used in wet conditions
« on: October 12, 2012, 04:40:59 PM »
Don't forget you also need a weather sealed lens to get full benefit of any weatherproofing.

The other thing you need to watch out for is if you'll be in an extremely dusty environment such as the desert. The dust can be very fine, and tends to get into everything no matter how sealed unless you provide additional protection.
Yes, good points!  I'll also add that some weather-sealed lenses need filters to complete the weather sealing.  Sand and dust are the worst!

I also like to protect from sea/salt spray if the ocean is rough.

Edited: I'll also add that I always make sure that I have the rain covers for my thinktank belt pouches (which are attached) and the rain covers for my camera bag/backpack to protect the rest of my equipment (don't ever take those out of your bag).

10
Canon General / Re: Weathersealed Camera Gear used in wet conditions
« on: October 12, 2012, 04:30:28 PM »
I protect my gear the same way that I would protect myself. 

So, if I'm running from the car to the store and I get a little wet, that's ok.  If I'm standing outside in the rain, I wear a rain jacket with a hood, and I'm supposedly waterproof.

I have no qualms about taking out my MKIV or 1DX in the rain or snow to take a few quick pictures.  However, if I'm going to be standing outside in the rain and shooting multiple pictures or I'm shooting an event, then I'll put my camera and lens in a rain cover.  I use the ThinkTank Rain Cover for events and I also carry an OPTECH Rainsleeve in each one of my camera bags and backpack for emergencies, you get two for $6.

11
Lenses / Re: New 600mm f/4L IS Mk II - availability?
« on: October 12, 2012, 04:07:14 PM »
Just a general follow up to the RRS series 3 vs Gitzo series 3 discussion.

Originally RRS was going after the Gitzo 5 series market with the RRS series 3.  The Gitzo series 3 states that it's ideal for lenses up to 400mm.  The RRS series 3 states in their catalog that it's ideal for the 600mm lens.

Technically according to Gitzo, the Gitzo 5 series is for the 500mm, 600mm, and 800mm lenses.  Now, I would certainly agree that the Gitzo series 3 does work well at focal ranges from 500mm to 1000mm.  However, Gitzo doesn't promote it that way.  So when you compare the specs keep that in mind. 

You should really compare the RRS series 3 with the Gitzo series 5 and when you do that then you will see what an accomplishment the RRS series 3 is.  Series 3 of one company does not necessarily equate with series 3 of another company.

Also, weight capacity doesn't necessarily translate to stability at longer focal length's.  Stability should really be tested separately from weight capacity.

I should also mention that I own the Carbon Gitzo systematic series 3, the 4 leg standard version, which I love by the way.  When I bought my Gitzo tripod about 3 years ago, the RRS tripods were severely back ordered and I was hesitant to buy a tripod unseen and untested, so I went with the Gitzo gold standard and I don't have any regrets. 

However, if I were buying today I would probably choose the RRS series 3, because I have been so impressed with the quality products that RRS continues to churn out, as well as the interoperability that they offer amongst their own products.  Personally, I also find it nice dealing with a local USA company for the convenience if any problems should arise.

12
Lenses / Re: New 600mm f/4L IS Mk II - availability?
« on: October 12, 2012, 03:37:32 PM »
Rich, do you also have a ballhead that you use with that set of legs?  If so, you might look at the RRS leveling base w/ clamp.  The TH-DVTL40 plate is sized for the Wimberley II base.  The clamp not only makes switching from gimbal to ballhead easy, it also makes setup/breakdown faster.  Also, you can get away with no ballhead if bringing a standard lens along - the RRS side gimbal can mount an L-bracket to use a standard lens, but the full gimbal and Wimberley cannot.  But, the leveling base clamp is a standard AS clamp, so you can just clamp in a camera base plate or L-bracket - granted, you have limited position control - but it can save weight on a hike...
Yes, I have The Markins Q20 ballhead , however I don't often switch from ballhead to Wimberley.  But, I'm still very interested in the RRS leveling base w/clamp, and the RRS Dovetail would be a nice bonus purchase for some convenience. It would also be cool to be able to take a landscape shot using the L-bracket and leveling base in a pinch. Thanks!

13
Canon General / Re: Screen Protector 1D IV?
« on: October 12, 2012, 08:33:34 AM »
Definitely get the Giottos! 

It's made of Schott German Glass and its' very nice!  I use these on all of my cameras, as they come in different sizes.  The clarity is great and they don't bubble up.

The MKIV uses the 3 inch model below:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/483871-REG/Giottos_SP8300_SP8300_AEGIS_Professional_Glass.html

14
Technical Support / Re: LP-E4 for 1D IV or LP-E4N
« on: October 12, 2012, 08:18:04 AM »
I interchange the 2 batteries that you mentioned between the MKIV and the 1DX and I haven't had a problem. 

As Neuro has pointed out the LP-E4N will charge to about 90%.  The MKIV doesn't drain the batteries as quickly as the 1DX, so you should be just fine with the 90% charge and if you do eventually purchase a 1DX then the new LC-E4N charger will come with it.  $438 Euros is a lot of money for the charger, so if you need the 100% charge (depending on your needs), it's cheaper to exchange for the older LP-E4 battery and save some money instead of buying the new charger.

P.S. I have both chargers since they came with the cameras, so I'm always getting a 100% charge.

15
Lenses / Re: New 600mm f/4L IS Mk II - availability?
« on: October 12, 2012, 08:07:29 AM »
Vkiran,  Congrats on the new lens!

One more point to add about the center column is that it also adds some additional weight when hiking and it also doesn't fold down as short, unlesss you remove it, but then it also takes longer to setup, ok so that was two points. :)

I can also definitely confirm that a leveling base would be nice with the super-telephoto.  It's a PITA to adjust either one or two legs when on uneven ground (which is most of the time) with the heavy lens on the tripod, and even then (pun intended) it's still hard to get the tripod level.  I don't have one yet but I do plan on purchasing one from RRS.

Rich

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 13