September 23, 2014, 02:28:06 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TexPhoto

Pages: 1 ... 40 41 [42] 43 44 ... 62
616
EOS Bodies / Re: 5DIII pre-order thread
« on: March 12, 2012, 01:12:11 PM »
5D II leaves today after an eBay sale.  :'(  Total cost for 3.3 years of ownership? $1321, or $1.14/day.  And that was for the kit and grip.  ;D

Hoping my 5D III ships soon after the March 22nd date...    Have a crop camera to tide me over.

617
Lenses / Re: New 70-200 f4L USM ???
« on: March 11, 2012, 08:38:10 PM »
It seems very unlikely they would replace this lens.  With the IS version already the better newer lens, and the 70-300 f5.6 IS intruding on the saw space, it's more likely they will discontinue it flat out.

From what I have heard, it is well worth the money, and you should buy without worry.

618
Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM
« on: March 11, 2012, 12:55:04 PM »

IMG_5738 by TexPhoto, on Flickr

619
You can't be overly sensitive about that stuff.  One person can smite you very 2 hours indefinitely on the same post.  So there is no winning.  And of course you can make 2+ accounts and applaud your self as well.

I'd love to see the ratio of smites to applause given by a person...

620
It would be far more interesting to see the applaud/smite ratio a person has given.

621
You can get smites for being a jerk, but also just for having a different opinion and polite about it.  It is the nature of the world.  The key is vengeance, I mean feeling good about yourself no matter what.

Love that one hitler sketch.  it's the first one of those I saw.

622
I'd recommend the Sigma 8-16 f/4.5-5.6 or Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8.  the Sigma because of the 8mm end.  You are buying an Ultra wide to shoot ultra wide.  8 MM is a whole lot wider than 10, or 11mm, and this lens gets good reviews. http://www.juzaphoto.com/article.php?l=en&article=31

The Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 would be my second choice for the build quality and f2.8.

623
Lighting / Re: 580 EX II problem retroreflective vest
« on: March 08, 2012, 09:36:30 AM »
In the above photo I'd have dialed in a +2 exposure compensation and reshot.  You can do the same thing shooting manual, but it will take longer.  For a "news" shot like this  I'd really ramp up the ISO, and try to capture as much ambient light as possible.  Shoot without the flash if you can, or as little as possible. 

Adding to the flash compensation is the wrong thing to do here.  The flash is causing the reflection.  If you could move the flash off camera a few feet, or bounce off something, that would have helped a great deal, but obviously is not ideal for quick shooting at an accident scene.

The camera is metering properly, but the retroreflective portions of the vests are much brighter  than the subjects making the camera.  The camera is averaging and overexposing the retro-r portions, underexposing everything else.

624
Canon EF Zoom Lenses / Re: Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM
« on: March 07, 2012, 09:40:42 PM »
Photos for an upcoming book on stray cats.


Untitled by TexPhoto, on Flickr


Untitled by TexPhoto, on Flickr

625
Canon General / Re: Canon coffee table...
« on: March 07, 2012, 07:15:46 PM »
Highest Megapixel coffee table ever!

626
Software & Accessories / Re: Before you upgrade to Lightroom 4...
« on: March 06, 2012, 03:05:03 PM »
At work, we upgraded to XP from Win 2K middle of last year.

At home, I use a Mac, and keep up with the adjustments.  When I bought CS5 they offered Lightroom for an extra $100.

627
Lenses / Re: Will these lenses be suitable for the new MkIII
« on: March 06, 2012, 12:04:47 PM »
Those 2 lenses are great, and may be all that you ever need.  I would add Sigma's 12-24mm II, and the 100mm Macro IS, to round out the kit. 

Maybe the 8-15mm fisheye instead of the Sigma if you are into fisheye.  Or, the 15mm fixed fisheye (Canon or Sigma) used.

628
EOS Bodies / Re: No f/8.0 autofocus with 5D Mark III
« on: March 05, 2012, 11:22:03 AM »
400 f2.8 IS + 2X on a 7D is great.  Gets you Waaaaay out there.


Untitled by TexPhoto, on Flickr


Did you know the vIII telles will not stack?  I have the 1.4X and 2X IIIs (replacing my vIIs), and I cannot stack them.  Not that I got good photos that way anyway. 

629
EOS Bodies / Re: I hope 5dx , 45 million pixels
« on: March 05, 2012, 08:27:38 AM »
When the D800 and 5DIII get into the hands of some real independent reviews, I think we will get the real picture.  Until then, I think we are stuck with maybe and promises.

It is interesting how people seemed really happy with the 18MP of the 1DX, but unhappy twits the 22MP of the 5DIII, Mostly because the Nikon competition is 16 and 36MP respectively.

630
While their might be diminishing returns in higher megapixels, i can't quite buy into lenses resolving a certain number of megapixels and no more.  As said above center and corner sharpness are 2 different things.  And, our current technology borrows from the neighboring pixels to obtain RGB for each pixel, when each is R, G, or B natively (all before the "RAW" image is recorded.)  And, from lens to image, there is an analog to digital conversion involving optical filters on the sensor, and proprietary algorithms in the computer.   I just don't see a lens being a single resolution.

In general however, obviously more and more mega pixels are going to need a better lens on a steadier platform to active the same per pixel sharpness.

Pages: 1 ... 40 41 [42] 43 44 ... 62