December 20, 2014, 09:06:03 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TexPhoto

Pages: 1 ... 41 42 [43] 44 45 ... 68
631
Technical Support / Re: Orange cone ruins photo
« on: April 30, 2012, 03:18:37 PM »
Sport field backgrounds can be terrible with distractions in the background.  Imagine if that was not a cone, but a giant Sony add with a soccer player and a soccer ball in the add.

632
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D III error 80 and failure to release shutter
« on: April 29, 2012, 07:15:54 PM »
I have not had the Error with since I formatted my Eye-Fi in my 5DIII.  I have shot maybe 300 photos since i did that.

633
Lenses / Re: Am I equipped to rip?
« on: April 29, 2012, 11:54:21 AM »
That is a great set.  This combo(Wide zoom, Long zoom, and fast 50) is often recommended by pros.  You can certainly add to it: fisheye, macro, super-tele, tilt-shift, but those can come later or not at all depending on your needs.

634
EOS Bodies / Re: 1Dx vs. 1D mk IV vs. 7d
« on: April 29, 2012, 01:40:29 AM »
I was really hoping the 1DX would lower the price of used Mark IVs to 3K or less, but without shipping, I think it's made things worse.

635
Lenses / Re: Going to Disneyland and San Diego and need lens help
« on: April 27, 2012, 12:38:57 AM »
I think you have the ideal lens in the 24-105, and I would not bring a 2nd lens for "vacation" photos. But i do like the 70-200 f4 IS, fantastic lens.  I do think you need a flash.

636
Maybe I'm a newb. How does this bracket help you take pictures?  It seems like a tripod head can hold the camera sideways just fine.

Most tripod heads do allow for a vertical position, but this usually moves the camera way off its position over the center of the tripod, and lowers it as much as 6 inches.  So the camera camera & tripod combination is no longer as stable as it could be, or as steady, or at the height of the photographer's eye.   And, composition can change substantially.  Swapping from horizontal to vertical with an L bracket avoids all that.  And of course the heavier & larger the camera/lens the more pronounced the effect. Add a vertical grip, and the problem grows.

Can you live without it?  Of course. 

637
Lenses / Re: Canon 1.4/24L or Carl Zeiss Distagon 1.4/35
« on: April 23, 2012, 02:27:45 PM »
If you search around time lapse forums you can find various ways to power your camera via 12V battery or A/C power.
http://forum.timescapes.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=6367

638
Lenses / Re: 400 DO f/4 vs 300 f/2.8is with x1.4 vs 400 f/2.8
« on: April 23, 2012, 10:36:54 AM »
Get a 1/4X extender no matter what.  I have a 400 2.8 and love having the 1.4X and 2.0X extenders when I need the extra reach.

639
Lenses / Re: 300/2.8 L (IS MK1) or 400/2.8 L (non-IS)
« on: April 23, 2012, 10:34:26 AM »
For my 400mm 2.8, I originally I used the hard case that it came in.  I want all the protection I can get.  Then I added an acrca-swiss plate and it would not fit.  Now I use a wheeled pelican case.  Also heavy but hey, it protects my investment, and I can sit stand on it.  My monopod is long enough that I can stand on the pelican, getting me over the heads of others.

I keep a small bike lock in the pelican so if I'm going to leave the empty case someplace while I move on the sidelines of a game, it's not going to walk away.

640
Canon EF Zoom Lenses / Re: Canon EF24-105mm f/4L IS USM
« on: April 22, 2012, 12:06:06 AM »

Untitled by TexPhoto, on Flickr


Untitled by TexPhoto, on Flickr


Untitled by TexPhoto, on Flickr


Untitled by TexPhoto, on Flickr

641
As mentioned.  Examples will give you a way better answer.  Post them to flikr or something.

I use a lens hood as much as I can.  The protection to the lens in a fall alone is worth it.   Buy a cheap ebay $5 replacement hood. 

Even if you use a UV filterer other, a hood can help.  he biggest problem with filters is they let light bounce around between the filter and lens, ussually from an out of camera light soucre.  Hoods often fix that.  And in a fall do you want your filter smashed, with broken glass pushed against you lens, or protected by a hood?

642
Lenses / Re: 300/2.8 L (IS MK1) or 400/2.8 L (non-IS)
« on: April 17, 2012, 10:56:43 AM »
Given the choice I'd say 300/2.8 L (IS MK1).  Even on a tripod, the IS can be very helpful. 

I own a 400 2.8 IS and love it, but it so big and heavy, the 300 2.8 IS is a great alternative. 

643
Lenses / Re: shooting into the sun...
« on: April 17, 2012, 10:44:58 AM »
I use welding glasses, and it''s never bothered my camera. Even shooting video.

Sun Country Flight SY789 by TexPhoto, on Flickr

644
400mm on a 1.6 crop camera is very long.  When I shoot football or soccer, it's too long, and I do much better with my 70-200 with no extenders. Of course that's from the sidelines.  A 70-200 2.8 will focus much faster and provide a crisp photo.  A cropped photo with proper focus will beat the pants off a blurry photo that is not cropped.

645
As soon as the forum dropped Karma, the downhill slide started.

More free advertising for Ken though.  :o

Pages: 1 ... 41 42 [43] 44 45 ... 68