August 20, 2014, 06:37:42 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Skulker

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 25
76
Lenses / Re: Stacked TCs - 1.4x III + 12mm Extension Tube + 2x III
« on: January 26, 2014, 05:39:52 PM »
here's one with a 12mm extension tube. I don't know if all lenses will do this. its a 300mm 2.8 with both converters.

on a light weight tripod, so it could have been better with better support.


77
Animal Kingdom / Re: MY dog
« on: January 22, 2014, 05:31:48 PM »
I've just joined the forum and have very much enjoyed seeing everyone's photos of their dogs.

This is Henry, my dog, an English Cocker Spaniel, with whom I am absolutely smitten!



You caught a great expression on his face.

And welcome to CR

78
Animal Kingdom / Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« on: January 22, 2014, 05:30:28 PM »
I find the barn owl one of the more enigmatic birds. I've never caught an image of one that dose them justice but I'm fairly please with this one.


Barn Owl - Devon by Tom W W, on Flickr

79
Animal Kingdom / Re: MY dog
« on: January 22, 2014, 03:48:25 PM »

Bugsy dragged us down to the beach the other day.


Bugsy on the Beach by Tom W W, on Flickr

80
Canon General / Re: Why Scott Kelby Switched to Canon
« on: January 21, 2014, 08:29:48 AM »
I´m the guy who swapped the gear with Scott Kelby  ;D
So you gave him a brand new camera in exchange for his old worn-out one  ;D

Its humour dude! get over it.  ;D

81
This is one example at 100%. The other problem pixels were red or blue.
Thanks for killing my first thread btw. This will be my last.
Cheers for all the genuine help ;)

That's a screen grab rather than a copy of the problem image. Somehow this seems strange. The OP sounds upset at several people being rather suspicious. Maybe he really is not getting peoples reasoning and so not understanding. It would have been good to see an image straight from a raw converter like LR or DPP.

82
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D MK III Images
« on: January 19, 2014, 06:02:49 PM »
I've always liked high contrast images, so was pleased to get these today.

Not the easyist light, but the 5D3 did well.

83
Landscape / Re: Post Your Best Landscapes
« on: January 19, 2014, 05:24:48 PM »
The dog dragged us to the beach today, Saunton Sands in Devon, UK if you're wondering.

The light was quite unusual.

84
Software & Accessories / Re: Need very large camera backpack
« on: January 15, 2014, 03:51:03 AM »
I use the low pro 600, you can certainly cram in a lot of kit.

but i have been told by a couple of seasoned travelers never to pack the camera attached to a long lens. To reduce the risk of damage to the mounts. You might like to consider this.

If you would like me to test the 200-400 in the case I can let you have my shipping address.  :)

85
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Just got 5D MK III. What do I check?
« on: January 13, 2014, 05:57:32 PM »
Hi everyone,

I just got a Canon 5D MK III in my hands. What should I check and look out for before the return period expires on me?

Thank you,
Eric

check you know how to use it, you know composition etc, then get out and enjoy. Don't bother looking for problems it'smuch more fun using them rather than looking to try and find a problem, you can catch trollitus infections.

86
Canon General / Re: What is the problem with Canon
« on: January 09, 2014, 04:28:10 PM »
all fine and well.
BUT ... a high-res, high DR, hi-ISO 1Ds III succesor is now overdue by more than a year.
1D X really is only the - very good! - successor to the 1D IV. 

Same situation as the overdue D4x for Nikon. But at least they got a D800E for hi-res, high DR.

Overdue in some peoples opinion, and I expect they want it for p&s money.  ::)

I took this shot today. It had far more resolution than I needed as I had to reduce the size considerably. And I'm happy with how it handled challenging lighting. And it was a grab shot in a hurry as I was limited by not wanting to fly into the flight path of a fast jet.

Some people make do with what they have and can still be creative.

87
Canon General / Re: What is the problem with Canon
« on: January 09, 2014, 03:54:03 PM »
I shoot with a 1Ds MkIII and basically love it but, it has horrible ISO performance and relatively low MP count as compared to Sony's chip in their, and Nikon's, cameras.  I continue to read that Canon has a comparable chip in testing as well as a crop chip, also in testing, that supposedly surpasses anything out there.
So, I ask you...what is the delay???       >:(

What did Sony have at the time of release for the 1ds3?

+1

Are we really comparing a camera from 2007 with cameras from 2012-2013?

and some of us are ignoring the blimming obvious 1Dx that many people manage to take some great pictures with.

88
Canon General / Re: Are Metal Mounts Better Than Plastic?
« on: January 04, 2014, 06:19:09 PM »

The fibers in carbon fiber components are usually from a cloth so alignment is easy.... It's sort of like with fiberglass.you could lay up fiberglass cloth in a mold or you could use  "chop glass", where short fibers were blown in place.... The chop layup is faster and cheaper, but the laid up cloth is both lighter and stronger.

BTW, we use carbon-fibre dishes in aircraft and on the satellites..... They are far better than metal dishes, particularly with thermal stability and weight.

You won't find may bits in a mass production lens made that way.


Edited to correct typo.

89
Canon General / Re: Are Metal Mounts Better Than Plastic?
« on: January 04, 2014, 06:09:50 PM »
I think that most people will mean the bayonets when they refer to "mounts". It may be that Roger knows better. Maybe people complain when the "mounts" break and from Rogers experience it's what he calls the mount that breaks rather than the bayonet.

On the subject of plastic mounts. Be they bayonets or what the bayonet mounts on. Many will be made of a filled  plastic. That filler may be glass, carbon, ceamic or inert filler as there are several options. It can be in the form of fibers, beads or powder as well as the obvious options of woven material that you probably wouldn't expect in a bayonet, but might well find in a mount as defined by Roger.

There are also several options for the matrix as well. Epoxy is not the most likely for this type of application.

The obvious problem with bayonet mounts for lenses is wear. As the lens is mounted and removed it may well be subject to abrasion. If it wears and the filler is exposed it can create a very abrasive paste or dust that may wear even more, and get in the camera. Thus causing even more wear.

Please don't think I don't like plastic, I'd quite happily buy a lens with "plastic" bayonets. But I wouldn't expect to see them on my 200-400 when I get it. (in my dreams)

90
Canon General / Re: Are Metal Mounts Better Than Plastic?
« on: January 04, 2014, 05:49:37 PM »
Look at the mount on the body, it's metal, but what is it attached to?

Umm, I think you have supplied your own awnser. The Body.  ;D

On my 1Dx that's made of magnesium BTW. But of course its weather sealed and Profesional quality.  ;D

I think your making a perfectly valid point, just couldn't resist the silly reply.

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 25