October 20, 2014, 10:56:50 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Etienne

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 44
316
EOS Bodies / Re: Crop sensors need cropped lenes
« on: August 10, 2013, 12:33:01 PM »
I have a Tokina 50-135 f/2.8 equiv to 80-112 mm.
It's a great lens. Much smaller than my 70-200L 2.8 IS II. BONUS: It is par-focal and that makes a big difference in video.
Pair that with a Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 and it is a great light-weight package for crop.
You could also add Sigma 30 1.4 and/or Canon 50 1.4.

317
Technical Support / Re: Canon 70-200 and 5DII sloppy fit
« on: August 09, 2013, 09:18:11 PM »
BTW ...  if the lens is otherwise a winner, then I'd keep it. You might exchange it and get one with optical problems and have to exchange again.  A little wiggle is normal. If in doubt, take it to a local camera shop and ask the techie there if it appears normal.

PS... I have the 70-200L 2.8 IS II and it wiggles a little on my 5DIII as well. IQ and performance is stellar!

318
Technical Support / Re: Canon 70-200 and 5DII sloppy fit
« on: August 09, 2013, 09:15:43 PM »
Each of my lenses fit a little different. Some have play some are really tight. And they aren't the same fit on different cameras either. One lens can be tight on the 5DIII, moderate on the 60D, and a little loose on the 5DII.
There's tolerances on both camera body and lens. Most of my lenses have a little wiggle; it is normal and will not affect image quality.

Of course it depends on how much wiggle. I had a 40D and lenses seemed a little loose. I had Canon look at it, and it was a bad lens mount on the camera body.

319
Lenses / Re: canon 50mm 1.4 vs 1.2
« on: August 09, 2013, 03:02:07 PM »
I own the 1.4 and have been coveting the 1.2 for a while. I've just seen a mint condition 1.2 second hand for a decent price.


I mainly shoot street and family photos. pretty much exclusively @ widest aperture so I would be buying the 1.2 to shoot @ 1.2


does anyone have an opinion on whether the 1.2 is worth it if I already have the 1.4?

Is there much real world difference between the two? (ignoring the obvious like build quality, size, weight and weather sealing)

I like my 50 1.4. It's light, unobtrusive, and versatile. It does a good enough job in the dark. pretty good at f/2, and biting sharp by 5.6

Your money is better spent on a different focal length for variety. Maybe 35 f/2 or 1.4, or my next lens: 24L f/1.4  :)

320
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: My Canon 5D III went down today :((
« on: August 09, 2013, 10:52:34 AM »
Try a different card

I'm shooting with 32GB Lexar Pro 1000x CF. I do have another card at home, I can give it a try at lunch today.

Do you think I have a bad Lexar CF???

It's not the camera.
I had a similar thing happen with that Lexar card and a bad CF card reader on my PC.
Use Sandisc recovery tool to get the images back, and then reformat the card in the camera.

321
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: My dead 5D Mark III Story
« on: August 09, 2013, 09:35:40 AM »
This is an odd story.
I've used my 5DIII in light rain, no problems so far.
In the past I've also used my 40D, 60D, 5DII and other cameras in enough drizzle that they are slightly wet when I came in, not to mention cold to warm transitions. I've just patted the water off and let them sit without  removing lenses or batteries until fully dry.
Haven't had a problem with any of these cameras.
I suspect that something was wrong with this camera since it was built.

322
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Mark II Information [CR2]
« on: August 07, 2013, 05:23:11 PM »
.
Nothing ignites passionate argument like Religion, Politics, and ... DOF on APS-C

Yep.  It's the inevitable death-spiral of a 7D rumor thread.

- A

+1

323
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 100-400 f/4-5.6L IS Update [CR2]
« on: August 07, 2013, 01:38:28 PM »
The photographer in me is hoping for a home run on this lens,
and the banker in me is already crying.

324
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Mark II Information [CR2]
« on: August 07, 2013, 01:33:21 PM »
.
Nothing ignites passionate argument like Religion, Politics, and ... DOF on APS-C

325
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Mark II Information [CR2]
« on: August 07, 2013, 01:24:39 PM »
To summarize:

Full-Frame is better at everything, Crop is cheaper.

While that is a fact, it does not summarize the original thread. In fact, it does not even relate to the original thread!
People (including some of CR's more illustrious contributors) keep posting in this thread how FF is better than Crop. We get it! Why whip this dead horse? If someone disagrees, be magnanimous and quietly laugh at their ignorance or denial.
This thread is about the "hopes and dreams" of people who cannot upgrade to FF or choose not to. Let's discuss this particular thread within that purview, yeah?

This thread was all over the map long before my comment, which was to poke fun at all of that stuff.
I am not anti-crop. Although I the 5DIII is my favorite, I have and use a 60D, and an EOS-M, and I am keenly interested in the upcoming 70D and possible EOS-M successor.

326
Not only is it arbitrary, but it also changes over time.  For example, when I was growing up, 28mm lenses were far more common than 24mm lenses.  But these days, I doubt many people are buying 28mm lenses - all the interest is in 24mm lenses or wider. 

The same could be said for 85mm.  While appreciating that many people buy 85mm lenses, I suspect that the "standard" longer prime would be in the 90-135mm range (especially when you consider all of the macro lenses in that range that are sold).

I agree with the 24mm vs 28
But 85mm is still by far the most popular short telephoto.
B&H has almost 1400 reviews of the 85 1.8, and only 90 reviews of the 100 f/2, even though these two lenses are about the same price, same size, and deliver the same IQ

327
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Mark II Information [CR2]
« on: August 06, 2013, 04:14:42 PM »
To summarize:

Full-Frame is better at everything, Crop is cheaper.

328
Software & Accessories / Re: Macro gear suggestions for 5DIII?
« on: August 05, 2013, 11:57:32 PM »
Thanks Neuro. Fascinating how much gear can be attached to a camera in a useful way

You should check out some of the cinema rigs.... like these  (there's actually a 5DII hiding in these rigs)

329
Software & Accessories / Re: Macro gear suggestions for 5DIII?
« on: August 05, 2013, 11:51:33 PM »
Is there an esoteric trick to insert an image in a CR comment?

I am not sure about any esoteric trick, but I have been following a simple system like others. Write (or start writing the comment) and then click on "Attachments and other option" below the message box where i am writing the comment and attach the small sized photograph/image from my computer.

LOL ... that's easy ... I was looking at all the buttons on the top of the comment box and couldn't find something that would work for a pic

330
EOS-M / Re: EOS M replaced my 5D kit
« on: August 05, 2013, 11:43:41 PM »
The IQ is good, for a compact camera, but not even close to my 5D3.

The IQ difference is much more noticeable to "downgrade."  Upgrading from Canon aps-c 18 mp sensor to 5D III gave me the sense of "pretty good" IQ upgrade.  But after getting used to 5D III RAW files for a long time, the same 18 mp sensor RAW files from EOS-M feels like a much bigger downgrade than initially thought, especially if one is shooting in low-light man-to-man ISO-wise. 

With EOS-M, one can still get great results by shooting in good light, or arrange to have more speedlites, strobes, reflectors, etc in low light IME, with a good noise reduction software like Noiseware becoming helpful to narrow the gap.

I am a fan of the 'M', but in no way could I see it replacing my 5DIII. I see the M as a camera on my belt when I might not otherwise have a camera. I am rarely happy with a phone camera shot, even for personal use, so the M is a big step up there.

I see a huge difference in IQ between the EOS M and the 5DIII. Mirrorless will probably replace DSLRs eventually, but I don't see that day on the horizon just yet. I think APS-C is best for mirrorless until all the tech is fully developed.

Once the AF, viewfinder, and ergonomics are mature, then a Full-frame mirrorless with mirrorless-optimized lenses will be the way to go. There's no point of a FF mirrorless on the end of today's 70-200 2.8, or larger lens. Or even the 16-35 2.8. All of that is still over the horizon.


Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 44