November 29, 2014, 03:02:52 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Krob78

Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 89
331
Reviews / Re: Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Review
« on: October 31, 2013, 12:05:46 PM »
The UMC appears to be the difference between the two.  Whatever they did worked.  The resolution is just stunning from this lens!
Dustin, your images are priceless as always!  You've just about sold me on this lens.  I'm not overly thrilled with my 17-40mmL like so many are, I miss my Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 with IS from my 7D days.  Had the Tokina 16-28mm but it is a beast and something was really wrong with my copy.  So now I'm without UWA, unless you consider the 17-40mm uwa, as most do, it's just not enough for me...

Is the 14mm Rok really the exact same lens as the Samyang and the others?  Is there any difference you know between any of them?  Looking forward to placing my order soon!  Thanks for the great review!  :D

First of all, thank you!  Secondly, to my knowledge the same optical lens is rebranded and sold under all of the various other brands.  Samyang is the most well known.  If you have a chance to choose the brand, I would go with either Samyang or Rokinon, simply because they are better known and the other brands thus appear more "cheap" and might diminish resale value (although this will probably be a lens you hang on to).

I just sold my 17-40L yesterday and have no regrets.
Thanks for your feedback!  I think I'll have no regrets letting go of my 17-40mmL either... though I use it mostly for Real Estate gigs...  I may go back to a Tokina 16-28 for that if the 14mm Roki is too wide for that type of usage... I wouldn't foresee issues taking the exterior photos but not sure about interior photos with the 14mm...

332
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D MK III Images
« on: October 31, 2013, 12:02:03 PM »
After taking another look at this image, I revisited my processing and decided to bring the exposure back up closer to where I started at out of camera.  Initially I didn't like all the green reflections on the water, it just seemed to busy as I remember, the wrong type of contrast for my likings...

lifting the exposure back up, I kind of like it better now.  Odd isn't it?  Why just a couple of weeks ago, I looked at the original image and thought, yuck, too much green... Now I look back and think, my, that's too dark, too black... I'm thinking this is a happy median.  Almost back to original exposure to bring out the vivid colors and textures but not quite so much that it spoils everything..

Perhaps I should revisit older images more often! lol! 

All the best!  :)

1/1000th
ISO 800
400mm
f/5.6

333
Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon EF 800mm f/5.6L IS USM
« on: October 31, 2013, 11:46:36 AM »
Wow!  Very capable lens when found resting in the hands or tripods of you capable photogs!!  Very nice work indeed throughout this particular forum!  Glad I found it, I'll be a frequent flyer here!  Thanks again for sharing everyone!  Oh and yes, AWESOME!!  ;D

334
Reviews / Re: Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Review
« on: October 31, 2013, 11:32:35 AM »
The UMC appears to be the difference between the two.  Whatever they did worked.  The resolution is just stunning from this lens!
Dustin, your images are priceless as always!  You've just about sold me on this lens.  I'm not overly thrilled with my 17-40mmL like so many are, I miss my Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 with IS from my 7D days.  Had the Tokina 16-28mm but it is a beast and something was really wrong with my copy.  So now I'm without UWA, unless you consider the 17-40mm uwa, as most do, it's just not enough for me...

Is the 14mm Rok really the exact same lens as the Samyang and the others?  Is there any difference you know between any of them?  Looking forward to placing my order soon!  Thanks for the great review!  :D

335
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Mark II Spec List Surfaces [CR1]
« on: October 31, 2013, 11:27:51 AM »
I am not about to say pixel size is the most important factor, however I would say it is far from a "mostly irrelevant factor."

Let us not take this out of the context in which it was said. We were talking about noise and the large pixel fallacy. I also said that smaller pixels collect more information, that there are tech related factors, etc.

Ok, fair enough.
Makes sense...

336
Software & Accessories / Re: DxO Optics Pro 9 released
« on: October 31, 2013, 11:26:32 AM »
I tested the new "PRIME" NR on a ISO 6400 image from my 5d2. I do not get anything that I cannot do with LR, for a few seconds. The trick in LR is to keep the chroma NR low, and apply tons of lumina NR. The overall look of the LR image - color, etc., is still better.
I tested the same image in both LR5 and Optics 9 Elite.  Side by side, I liked the Optics 9 slightly better, the transitioned image seemed just a bit smoother, butteryer... (have fun with that one all you lingual aficionados).  The LR5 image still looked a little on the posturized side, not quite has smooth, not quite satisfying for me... 

That being said, I think none of my critics, fans or clients would see any difference, somehow  they just don't notice the noise as much as I do... I'm not always pleased with the way my 5d3 handles noise, though I'm thrilled with the ISO levels that I can use and dare to go too. 

I just took some really severely noisy images last week and I'm looking forward to seeing if DxO can do anything more than LR can with them.  With LR, there are no keepers.  It'll be interesting.

One thing I'm interested in trying is to hit an image lightly with LR NR and then move it into Optics 9 to see if I can get a better finish on the NR in an image that way...

The only thing I don't like so far is that DxO automatically gives it's own interpretation of the newly uploaded image immediately.  I'd rather  it just accept the image the way I've already processed it and just let me work with NR only, not all the other options.  I'm sure it can be set up not to auto process the photos, I just haven't had a chance to dig further into it yet...

So far, I like it.  Not sure I like $199 worth...  :)

337
Animal Kingdom / Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« on: October 31, 2013, 11:14:38 AM »
some more experimentation with the 100-400 + 1.4x ... does reasonably OK, I think  8)
That's an interesting image with the broken glass!  Did you use any NR on this one Jr?  What were your settings?

338
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D MK III Images
« on: October 31, 2013, 11:10:47 AM »
DIF
1/1250th s
ISO 3200
f/5.6
360mm

Love this one.  Amazing that at 1/1250th the wings still blur, eh?  Thanks for posting the camera settings.  That makes it that much more interesting to us camera geeks!
Thanks Rusty, at 1/1600th it froze the wings in the previous image but I really wanted to try and convey the motion, just a little bit so I decided to start stopping down the shutter speed.  1st adjustment to 1/1250 did it!  I was hoping to see some motion but not lose to much detail... Thanks again!  :)

339
Landscape / Re: Beautiful sunsets
« on: October 31, 2013, 11:07:04 AM »
On a monster road trip this summer, we stopped by Yellowstone and experienced one of the most amazing sunsets I've ever seen:

Beautiful   ! But where's Yogi Bear ?
Must be something in the translation Sporgon, Yogi lives in Jellystone, not Yellowstone!  ;D

340
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D MK III Images
« on: October 30, 2013, 11:04:29 PM »
DIF
1/1250th s
ISO 3200
f/5.6
360mm
NR with new DxO's Optics Pro 9

341
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D MK III Images
« on: October 30, 2013, 11:02:10 PM »
Hi Richard, I mentioned previously having some DIF (Dragonfly in flight) images, here's one... I couldn't remember where I filed them!  I've recently moved and don't have my external drives set up yet, so some images I've put on my internal HD, totally forgotten! 

Anyway, I'll post others as I get a chance!

This is right after getting my 100-400mm back from Canon, very pleased with the results from Canon.  I had to set my MFA settings back to zero!  That was surprising...

anyway:
5D MkIII
EF 100-400mm
1/1600th s
ISO 800
f/5.6
Neat shot!
Thanks RPT, it was fun!

342
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D MK III Images
« on: October 30, 2013, 10:10:33 PM »
Hi Richard, I mentioned previously having some DIF (Dragonfly in flight) images, here's one... I couldn't remember where I filed them!  I've recently moved and don't have my external drives set up yet, so some images I've put on my internal HD, totally forgotten! 

Anyway, I'll post others as I get a chance!

This is right after getting my 100-400mm back from Canon, very pleased with the results from Canon.  I had to set my MFA settings back to zero!  That was surprising...

anyway:
5D MkIII
EF 100-400mm
1/1600th s
ISO 800
f/5.6

343
Canon can do a better job, the process of doing a cleaning cycle and long dark exposure will clean up minor issues.
Agreed, I'll throw a couple of lenses in the box for free clean & check and wait a few days to get them back... Kill two birds with one stone, so to speak...

Just don't tell anyone in the bird forum that I said that!  ;D

344
Landscape / Re: Post Your Best Landscapes
« on: October 30, 2013, 09:31:48 PM »
Just thought I'd post this for giggles!  ;D

I was trying to get a shot of the sign that says, "Do Not Cross This Line"  Rocks On Ledge Are Loose And Subject To Falling"  "Passing this Line Could Result in Serious Injury or Loss Of Life". 

Well, I realized they were so far beyond the sign, I couldn't get it anywhere near the frame...

Wind gusts that day from 40-55mph!  I particularly like the guy on his knees... wasn't sure if he was getting ready to jump or trying out a "Titanic" Bow Pose!  Anyway, it was kind of a fun photo! 

All the best! :)

345
Landscape / Re: Post Your Best Landscapes
« on: October 30, 2013, 09:23:56 PM »
Another image from the old 7D and the 18-135mm Kit lens!

Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 89