July 24, 2014, 07:27:07 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - JohanCruyff

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
1
EOS-M / Re: Ef-m 50-200 now in stock at amazon.de
« on: Today at 05:07:21 AM »
327 eur @ Amazon.it
 
291 @ Amazon.es  :o

2
You seems to have good lenses, so if you look at old film lenses should be something really unique.
I have Canon 40 2.8 pancake and even with adapter is small enough for M.
You can also wait for native 50mm lens for M.
Thank you.
 
It depends on what you mean by "worth it".  As you may have noticed, lots of vintage manual lenses are cheap, and lots of those can be very good to superb; it's an inexpensive way to play around with a variety of lenses.  Given the tiny size of the M you'll likely want small lenses.  If so, Pentax is perhaps the best place to start - a few weeks ago a bought a Pentax Super-Takumar 50mm 1.4 for c. $100 which makes excellent images, and an even smaller Pentax-M 50mm 1.7 for less than half that.  Check out the pentax forum for vast numbers of user reviews.  Your 100L is a marvelous lens, of course, but you might rather use something a lot smaller, such as the superb Nikon 55mm 2.8 macro (if you want to get close) or the Nikon E series 100mm 2.8, which looks tiny next to a 100L.  I recently bought both those lenses in excellent shape for c. $120 each (and could have paid less if I had tried harder).  With the right adapters, the range to choose from is vast.  (I use them on my Olympus M43 and Sony a7r & a6000, but I don't see why they wouldn't work at least as well on an EOS-M.)

Thanks for your suggestions. You're right, I would like to try a light/small lens on my M.
I also have to consider that a new 50mm Canon (F/1.8 IS?) could (will eventually) be delivered, so I'm not sure about having (in the future) two prime lenses with the same focal lenght.
Maybe something different (the 100mms you mentioned, or a good 35mm...).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
I recently installed Magic Lantern on my M and appreciated the improved ability of manual focussing, thanks to the focus peaking feature.
 

What is your impression on the Magic Lantern?? Did you see any  problem?? Which built day did you used? I am thinking about installing magic Lantern on my EOS-M. But I have also read that there are problems with the shutter release.  Thanks for the advice in advance.

No problems so far, but I just played with it two hours, so I'm not (yet) a reliable tester.

3
EOS-M / Adapters + legacy lenses on the EOS M: any advice?
« on: July 23, 2014, 08:47:26 AM »
I recently installed Magic Lantern on my M and appreciated the improved ability of manual focussing, thanks to the focus peaking feature.
 
At almost-macro distance, the 100mm IS Macro L plus focus peaking gave me better result than using autofocus, so now I'm more confident about manual focus and I wonder whether an investment in "old" lenses (plus adapter) is worth or not.
 
With regard to one popular FD lens, I think that it is not worth to spend some 50 €/$ for an old FD 50mm F/1.8, because I can buy a new EF 50mm F/1.8 (which I could borrow to my daughter's 1100D/T3 or to my own 5D) for 90/100 €/$... but I'm almost sure that there are ancient lenses with better value for money than the 50mm F/1.8, or with unique features.
 
 
I don't own any legacy gear, but please feel free to post in this thread not only suggestions on possible purchases you made, but also your esperiences with lenses that you already owned and that woke up due to the arrival of a mirrorless body.
 
 
Thank you in advance for your advice, fellow friends from Canonrumors Forum! :)

4
Abstract / Re: Beautiful bokeh! Let me see yours!
« on: July 15, 2014, 04:22:08 PM »
I remember the day I got my EOS M, my first (and only, so far) body with an APS-C sensor. [size=78%]I wondered if one could get a proper bokeh out of it, especially considering how short the 22mm was.[/size]


I tested it taking a self-portrait using a bike bell as a mirror.

5
Thank you.  :)
 
I would add
2. AF point selection: The touch screen does a better job than the dial on the 40D

Using x5 or x10 zoom mode helps to get a more accurate focus if you want a really-shallow-depth-of-field picture: sometimes it is a bit unpredictable what part of the subject the AF will lock.
 
My other body is a 5D classic, so I don't know if this "issue" is M specific or live-view generic.

6
Abstract / Re: Beautiful bokeh! Let me see yours!
« on: July 14, 2014, 08:15:44 AM »
Christmas in Paris (5d + 100mm F/2.8 IS L Macro)

7
Abstract / Re: Beautiful bokeh! Let me see yours!
« on: July 12, 2014, 03:45:44 PM »
5Dc & 70-200mm F/4 L IS

8
Abstract / Re: Beautiful bokeh! Let me see yours!
« on: July 12, 2014, 03:43:42 PM »

5Dc & 100mm F/2.8 Macro L IS

9
Reviews / Re: Is Canon 5d mk 1 still a good camera?
« on: July 09, 2014, 04:06:14 AM »
5Dc is a fine camera but I wouldn't upgrade unless you have your lenses lined up first. It's better money spent on glass first then when you have your lenses ready, the 6D/5D3 will be waiting.
...and if you wait until 2015, you could be possibly able choose to upgrade to a used 6D/5D3 or to a new 6D2/5D4...
 
That's what is happening to me: I can't convince myself that I need a new Full Frame body, so I'm keeping my 5Dc plus my EOS M when I need to shoot videos or to travel light.
 
 

10
Lenses / Re: What was your first L lens?
« on: June 05, 2014, 03:11:49 PM »
I would have though almost everybody would have the same answer as me: the 24-105mm L!


+1




11
Canon General / Let's confess our disgusting perversions
« on: May 06, 2014, 03:02:18 AM »
I'll start confessing mines.
 
In spite of the huge efforts made by the Research And Development Departments of most companies belonging to the Photographic Industry, aiming to offer us better products,
 
1) First of all, I don't dislike lens flare. I must be a true fetishist in this field, because I like the "flare effect" seen in digital cartoon movies (e.g. Pixar's "Up").
2) I don't dislike vignetting. I could be defined a moderate pervert with respect to vignetting, because I don't add it deliberately to pictures.
3) I don't dislike a reasonable amount of noise in pictures. Again, I don't add it where there's no OOC noise and I don't underexpose my pictures in order to get the maximum possible noise, so I guess my therapy shouldn't be so extreme.
 
And what about you, my fellow friends from CanonRumors? Are you shameless enough to confess that sometimes you like something that's not technically perfect?
 
 

12
I made a short test with my 70-200 F/4 IS L on my M, but the ergonomy was very poor and the autofocus slower than with EF-M lenses.
 
After reading positive reviews about the combo EOS M + Adapter + 55-250 IS STM, I ordered the new zoom lens: it's 6 centimeter shorter and weights much less.
 
I plan to take picture of relatively slow moving subjects this summer ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proboscis_monkey ), but I have a B-plan: if the autofocus and ergonomy are below my expectations, I will lend it to my daughters' 1100D / T3 Rebel.
 
 

13
EOS Bodies / Re: 1d IV vs. 7D II
« on: April 17, 2014, 06:12:35 AM »
Reading this thread, I can't understand why I never see "sticky" threads on this forum.
 
BTW, I'm sure there are been people who sometimes complain about their 1D IV, but nobody has ever complained about his/her 7DII, so we can induce that the latter is better from a KarlPopperian point of view.
 
 

14
It will be interesting to compare the first (aps-c 70D) and the second (ff C100) release of Dual Pixel AF, just to figure out how the future 5Div, 6Dii etc. will perform.

15
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: RAW or JPEG
« on: September 08, 2013, 04:36:31 PM »
There's a T-shirt in my wishlist: [size=78%]http://500px.com/photo/8193081[/size]

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6