Messages

31

Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L IS [CR1]

« on: October 30, 2012, 11:18:08 AM »

Come on guys, you're all avoiding the real issue here - CANON SHOULD BE PUTTING STABILIZERS BUILT INTO THEIR CAMERAS.

But then Canon should design bodies again.

32

Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L IS [CR1]

« on: October 29, 2012, 11:28:57 AM »

Between $2799 - $3299.

33

HDR - High Dynamic Range / Re: Post your HDR images:

« on: October 23, 2012, 11:11:20 AM »

Birgitta. Going to it's last sail before winter.


And again if link image is not showing up like for me, here's direct link to it:
http://flic.kr/p/dmVKYg

34

Lenses / Re: Lens suggestions for 3 weeks trip to Egypt and Jordan

« on: October 22, 2012, 11:08:56 AM »

I would personally take:
 -Wide angle (16-35L II or 17-40L)
 -Telezoom (70-200L II or 70-300L)
 -Walk-around (24-105L)

35

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Unreliable AF on 7D with FW 2.0.3?

« on: October 12, 2012, 08:14:31 AM »

Haven't noticed that problem
Worked like a charm with 1.2.5 - 2.0.0 and now with 2.0.3.

36

Canon General / Re: How do you sell your gear?

« on: October 11, 2012, 04:07:03 PM »

Would someone link CL to this? Would like to check it out.

37

EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: Settings for a movie

« on: October 11, 2012, 12:30:25 PM »

What else, Hmmm..

FPS and Shutter speed if you are going with 24FPS use 1/50th, 30FPS 1/60th etc. ISO between 100-800 ( With 5D3 you might go higher )

38

Abstract / Re: Abstract streetlight art

« on: October 10, 2012, 04:41:30 PM »

I would but have to wait another sunny day ... have rained now like 1½ week without stops.

39

Abstract / Re: Abstract streetlight art

« on: October 10, 2012, 01:48:32 PM »

Would love to go there!
But first I've need to finish my school

40

Canon General / Re: DxOMark vs. Reality

« on: October 09, 2012, 01:40:49 PM »

Regarding the glass, DxO is probably the only source that suggests 70-200 f/2.8 IS mkII is less sharp than mark I (suggesting mkII is better in the center but overall mkI is better, if my memory is not failing me). I do not think that affected the 70-200 f/2.8 mkII sales either, rather the effect was on the credibility of the DxO...

Cheers!

And I've always heard that MK2 is superb sharp even sharper than MK1.

41

Lenses / Re: 100mm f/2.8L IS vs 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II for Macro

« on: October 08, 2012, 09:44:13 AM »

Once you're talking about extension tubes so how much closer does 25mm extension take focusing?

42

Lenses / Re: Canon EF 14-24 f/2.8L [CR2]

« on: October 07, 2012, 01:30:39 PM »

Anything new about 14-24 F2.8L?

43

EOS Bodies / Re: Looks like the 6D may not be so bad after all

« on: October 07, 2012, 12:26:25 PM »

Kinda funny to test FF against APS-C body and older tech what 7D holds.

44

EOS Bodies / Re: Is Canon EOS-1S the Name? [CR1]

« on: October 06, 2012, 11:10:09 AM »

At least the name makes sense 1S, S=Studio but $9000 doesn't make sense in this one

45

Software & Accessories / Re: What are most people using for processing RAW

« on: October 04, 2012, 12:34:36 PM »

LR 4.1 and Photoshop CS6, but 70% off editing on LR 4.1 after that if it needs some photoshopping I export the image to Photoshop to add final touch.