Lovely shots, really liking 2nd and 3rd one!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Come on guys, you're all avoiding the real issue here - CANON SHOULD BE PUTTING STABILIZERS BUILT INTO THEIR CAMERAS.But then Canon should design bodies again.
Regarding the glass, DxO is probably the only source that suggests 70-200 f/2.8 IS mkII is less sharp than mark I (suggesting mkII is better in the center but overall mkI is better, if my memory is not failing me). I do not think that affected the 70-200 f/2.8 mkII sales either, rather the effect was on the credibility of the DxO...And I've always heard that MK2 is superb sharp even sharper than MK1.