May 20, 2013, 12:14:16 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dstppy

Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 39
526
PowerShot Cameras / Re: PowerShot Rumor: S95 Replacement [CR2]
« on: July 01, 2011, 11:51:51 AM »
Unless your view finder images through the lens, what's the benefit to be gained by squishing the camera up against your face?

Shade. 

Listen, unless you're using a XH G1S, I think you're still gonna get a sunburn regardless of your technique.

Yes. I know I'm going to hell for that.

527
PowerShot Cameras / Re: PowerShot Rumor: S95 Replacement [CR2]
« on: June 28, 2011, 04:06:43 PM »
I was about to buy an S95 as a pocket camera / back up to my SLR but looking back announcements for S90 & S95 have both been on 19th August in 2010 & 2011 repectively so I will hang fire to either get an S100(?) or cheaper S95 depending on what it delivers.  S100 sounds like evolutionary improvement on S95 which in turn was on S90 and is expected to be a 'better' camera following Canon's Kaizen strategy but I may not need it to turn out good pictures.

12mp would be nice but is not essential and wouldn't make me buy s100 over a cheap s95.
5x Zoom again good but better if wide angle goes out to 24mm (to 120) or even 27mm (to 135).   Wider + 5x zoom would make me get the s100.

Other items I would like:
Even better dynamic range / low light handling / even bigger sensor (as rumored for G13).  We can dream.
No change in max aperture unless it becomes f/1.8!
1080p would be interesting but is not essential.  Slomo/fastmo capabilities of Nikon P300 would also be nice.
No increase in size/weight unless building in improved grip.
Move from 460k to 920k screen to rival P300 would also help in-camera review.
Improved start up time.
Closer macro focus.

The S95 (or replacement) are technically P&S cameras and thus, the (in-stock) sweet spot tends to be between The first part of November and the middle of December for hot deals.  Got mine for $299 from Amazon around Thanksgiving. 

That said, clearance time is always awesome for those of us that are frugal as well, but you risk missing out.  Every month or so, I remind her that it's now selling for $400 . . .  ;D

528
EOS Bodies / Re: 1D MK IV now in Stock at Canon Refurb Store
« on: June 28, 2011, 04:00:52 PM »
Refurbished 1D MK IV just popped up today at the Canon refurb store,

New 1D MK IV's are hard to find.  Adorama wants $5500 for one.
$4k OOS . . . musta only had one for sale :o

529
Lenses / Re: Where to from here?
« on: June 28, 2011, 08:07:47 AM »
One thing you will need to quickly realize is that if you ever intend to switch to full frame you wont be able to use EF-S lenses.


Agreed, you need to be careful about which EF-S lens you choose; for the same reason, you need to understand that EF reviews can be from FF cameras . . . and an 85mm macro is not used in the same way on a crop that it is on a FF.

EF-S lenses also lose value pretty quickly.


Citation required. 

Any of the better EF-S are subject to the same ups/downs as good EF lenses.
http://www.canonpricewatch.com/product/00040/Canon-EF-S-17-55mm-f2.8-IS-USM-price.html
http://www.canonpricewatch.com/product/00029/Canon-EF-S-10-22mm-f3.5-4.5-USM-price.html
http://www.canonpricewatch.com/product/02852/Canon-EF-S-15-85mm-f3.5-5.6-IS-USM-price.html
http://www.canonpricewatch.com/product/00002/Canon-EF-S-60mm-f2.8-Macro-USM-price.html


530
Portrait / Re: Cinematic Street Photography0
« on: June 24, 2011, 03:38:07 PM »
I noticed you are using the 85mm, and that you are not that far away from the subject. I did try to take street photography with 70-200 + 1.4 TC so to have distance advantage, but in shorter distance, the white lens get noticed. I definitely need to learn from your work, and will check your flickr account frequently !

I'm considernig picking up the 200mm f/2.8L II USM for this type of thing.

You lose the ability to zoom, but you're not as exposed as it's a stealth L telephoto :)

531
Portrait / Re: Levitating self portrait?! :O
« on: June 24, 2011, 03:31:21 PM »
Take a look at her work, this is the link to her website. i thought it would be inspiring to share it with this community, she uses canon 5dm2 :)
very creative i think!


http://yowayowacamera.com/banana/


Yeah, easy for them . . . all Asian people can fly.  Just ask my wife  ;)

I'm guessing these are photochop?

532
PowerShot Cameras / Re: PowerShot Rumor: S95 Replacement [CR2]
« on: June 23, 2011, 03:19:22 PM »
Actually, come to think of it, the only thing the S95 is truly lacking is . . . a flash that isn't located where your finger intuitively holds the camera :D

533
PowerShot Cameras / Re: PowerShot Rumor: S95 Replacement [CR2]
« on: June 22, 2011, 10:08:07 PM »
Camera manufacturewrs have had a dismal record of product naming.  They obviously did not forsee the rapid development of digital cameras, and thought that like film cameras, they might pop out a new model every 10 years.

They really need to develop a better plan for naming models.

Well, they went from S80 to S90 to S95 . . . S100 is not inevitable . . .

Honestly, I don't see what's wrong with the MK version. Hell, Honda is so much better than GM just from sticking to a naming convention alone.  The current accord is informally the 8th generation . . . which is perfectly fine as insiders all know what it means, and you can quickly find out with a google search.


534
PowerShot Cameras / Re: PowerShot Rumor: S95 Replacement [CR2]
« on: June 22, 2011, 04:30:44 PM »
Canon has a PowerShot S100 long time ago, a 2MP camera using CF card, probably the first digital Elph, as far as i remember.  They should give the new camera a new name to avoid any confusion.

The new "S95" replacement should have specs similar to the Olympus XZ-1.
I'm thinking the same. Hell, S95 Mk II would be fine.

I just don't see that they'd call it S100 due to the old model.

535
Canon General / Re: Light Field Cameras/Sensors?
« on: June 22, 2011, 09:20:11 AM »
Okay, so, um . . . this seems fairly doable with existing hardware, only technically requiring firmware and/or PC link no?

As far as I could see you could do the easy ones by hand (stills):
Get a tripod, a fast lens with super fast focus motor . . . start with a reference shot with very high DOF.  Then, set your aperture where you want it, and take repeated shots either using different AF points, or even manually focus . . . merge.

Granted, the reality of this is a slippery slope with regard to hand holding, automation etc; you know, genuine usability.  Honestly, I think most of this could be 'faked' with a current Canon models, at least to the extent that you would ever need/want it for a real world situation.

On the other hand, instead of merging these and making them online, it'd make a nice sequential image in a frame :)

--EDIT--
I got to thinking about it even more and I think I get it, essentially they're talking about streaming sensor data 'realtime' (hah, no such thing, right?) and you can combine the fragments to 'fake' shutter speed, iso, no?

Another thought is if this is conceptually coming from a computer guy, I know where this is going . . . get as much data as possible and cherry pick the good ones . . . Maybe this is lobbying from the memory industry for bigger files :D

536
EOS Bodies / Re: 60D + EFS17-55 f/2.8 - £1000 at Tesco
« on: June 20, 2011, 11:01:56 AM »
yeah my order status is the same.

the only thing that worries me is:

"For delivery on Friday 31st December 9999 between 11:59pm - 11:59pm"

don't think I'll be home for that time XD

And besides, the 5D3 will probably have been announced by then....


Martin

Yes, but sadly, the EF 8-15mm f/4L Fisheye USM still probably won't be available for purchase yet.   ;D

537
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D mrk. II
« on: June 16, 2011, 09:20:11 AM »
Can anybody verifi this?

I can verify that Canon has never made a 'rule of thirds' focusing screen (they make grid screens, but the grids are more dense than that).  Live View WITH autofocus?  The current model does that.  Bogus.  But thanks for playing!

Right, and GPS? Heh.  Someone got bored just to yank our chains.  I wonder if people think by starting rumors that they'll actually get Canon to MAKE something that they WANT . . . sure hasn't helped with the 5dmk3 :D

538
United States / Re: where do you print?
« on: June 15, 2011, 08:39:12 AM »
Search here really frickin sucks -- I searched and almost decided to post, then browsed and found this topic  :o

This was exactly what I was looking for -- but I call into question "Target" and such -- I'd read that before, that people just get prints done at local places, so I recently had some father's day stuff done at CVS.  I couldn't BELIEVE how crappy it turned out.  The images were dark and unclear -- not blurry, but, sort of like they were printed in a color palette with a lot less colors, and down-sampled badly (is that even possible).

My family maligns me for my high standards in pretty much everything, but this time my mother could clearly see it and my wife (begrudgingly :D ) admitted that they didn't look exactly right.

So, I'm sending a rush job off to AdoramaPix, which would have been cheaper, had I not waited so long and just relied on CVS. 

From this, it's obvious that you can't just go ANYWHERE, so my question is:
Are particular stores are better because people are actually trained on the equipment/the printers are well maintained & calibrated -- OR -- are all of particular chain stores (e.g. Sams/Costco) better because they carry higher end equipment and yield nicer prints.

539
Lenses / Re: Canon Announces EF-S 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS II
« on: June 14, 2011, 10:27:40 AM »
I got through the first page of posts without seeing it wasn't USM -- at first I thought it was in the same line as the 15-85/60 type lenses (which are a total credit to the EF-S format), but it's another entry level; oh well.

Well, on the upside, at least canon is actually announcing some things -- which were bound to be announced before the 5Dmk3 . . . so it's not all doom-and-gloom :)

540
Canon General / Re: Canon Expands Production in Taiwan
« on: June 09, 2011, 03:43:52 PM »
"Did you hear the one about the S-Class owner that doesn't tell people constantly that he drives an S-Class? Me neither." :D

must be the same as with the guys who post all the camera gear they own in their signatures.  :P

 ??? Last I checked, my equip is the equivalent of a Honda Accord . . . don't get me wrong, I added a 1D badge to my 60D, took the  70-300mm and got some Testors Insignia Red to put around the rim and it shoots like one of those big-white lenses . . . no really!  I can post a write-up if ya want with the exact specs, easily shoots twice as many FPS now  ;D

Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 39